Crime Tulsi starts the intelligence community cleanup, fires over 100 participants in "horrific" lgbtq NSA chat

Do you agree with the cleaning up of the intelligence community from individuals such as these?


  • Total voters
    60
I don't think we're going to agree on this one dude. For me I would judge them on their abilities as an intelligence officer and the work they're putting on my desk.

If I'm running a company and a member of the sales team is making me millions they can talk about buttholes in private messages all they want as long as they're not sending the messages to anyone who'd find them offensive. Maybe you'd fire them in that scenario. That doesn't make sense to me, because I don't think it's what would be best for the company.
You can't judge somebody on their abilities to be an intelligence operative when said person isn't even able to abide by the rules he signed on to. That's the opposite of competence for that world. Firing was excellent.
 
You can't judge somebody on their abilities to be an intelligence operative when said person isn't even able to abide by the rules he signed on to. That's the opposite of competence for that world. Firing was excellent.

Alright dude, agree to disagree.
 
Very thought police of you.
Thought police don't have documentation that would make it to discovery should they have been able to charge anyone with a crime. (Albeit not very likely)
A simple conflict of interest exists with sexual proclivities involving an intelligence community asset or agent being a means to compromise that person. It is one of the oldest tools of espionage.


*tell me you have a kink chat at work without telling me you have a kink chat at work.
<6>
 
You can't judge somebody on their abilities to be an intelligence operative when said person isn't even able to abide by the rules he signed on to. That's the opposite of competence for that world. Firing was excellent.
Yeah, the ability for someone to be blackmailed in some type of honeypot operation is enough imho to merit termination given these are valuable security assets of the country. As well as high value targets of foreign governments.
 
If doesn't really justify firing these people if there was anyway. If anything if it was really encouraged to talk about it in the office then sacking them for talking about something they were being encouraged to talk about it's even worse.
have you ever been employed? People get fired for way less for saying inappropriate shit in their emails and messengers. Anything sexual is pretty much a guaranteed firing.
 
Your workplace encourages you to talk about something, you talk about said thing, your workplace sacks you for talking about it.

The only logic I can see for that being cool is just that you don't like trannies.
Ah ok.. you’re retarded
 
have you ever been employed? People get fired for way less for saying inappropriate shit in their emails and messengers. Anything sexual is pretty much a guaranteed firing.

Yeah, I'm at work right now. If one person said it why get rid of everyone in the chat?
 
Yes she did. You don't know how Twitter threads work? She reacted to his opening post, which continued with the rest that contained screenshots from the chats.



The primary reason I don't believe it (yet) is because of how ridiculous it all sounds. That there's a trans "cult" inside the NSA getting people in trouble for "deadnaming."

If it does happen to be true, fire all of them retards.

I'm just taking it with a grain of salt for now. This City-Journal is also rated as pretty far right on MediaFactCheck Bias BTW. I take anything labeled "far" anything with a grain of salt.
 
The primary reason I don't believe it (yet) is because of how ridiculous it all sounds. That there's a trans "cult" inside the NSA getting people in trouble for "deadnaming."

If it does happen to be true, fire all of them retards.

I'm just taking it with a grain of salt for now. This City-Journal is also rated as pretty far right on MediaFactCheck Bias BTW. I take anything labeled "far" anything with a grain of salt.
Fair enough.
 
While I don't have an issue with the firing seperate from anything else, the outrage behind this is completely based on the average person's inability or refusal to read. What was being said was nothing depraved. Y'all read the click bait and stopped. It's sad that this deep into a thread Y'allstill choose to be illiterate. They should get fired because they violated company policy. That is the only issue.

And also, y'all are some hypocrites and snowflakes when it comes to trans people. If I sent every marine who talked about inappropriate shit during work hours on government assets to NJP, we'd be at 1/10th the man power. Nobody on here would give a fuck if it were a group chat of people cracking racist jokes about coworkers or dudes making dick jokes or talking about girls that fucked.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top