Crime Tulsi starts the intelligence community cleanup, fires over 100 participants in "horrific" lgbtq NSA chat

Do you agree with the cleaning up of the intelligence community from individuals such as these?


  • Total voters
    60
I'm not buying those are real messages.

1. How the hell did this Christopher Rufo guy get access to the contents of a private NSA messaging app?

2. The people are talking like high schoolers with spelling errors everywhere. One person spelled "aesthetics" as "asthetic." Sounds like a retard. Wouldn't you need at least a college degree to get a job in intelligence?

3. If these are real, these people should be fired just for having such bad grammar and being stupid enough to talk about shit like this on official government software.



Although I do not believe these messages are real, the first amendment just means they can't be criminally prosecuted. Firing someone for speech they don't like on their government platform has nothing to do with free speech and they're completely free to do that.
Would tulsi come on TV saying over 100 people were fired for it if it wasn't true?
 
@Fanu can name 20 countries he would rather live in while simultaneously admitting that currently highly educated people want to work/live in US.

<JagsKiddingMe>
People want to live and work in the US because we're a stable country with rule of law and and openness to integrating foreigners but Trump is against basically all of that.
 
The longer you live, the more you realize that people in any position, in any field, are mostly retarded.
In most industries everything is run according to guidelines and most people aren’t smart enough to know when not to follow algorithms.
 
Would tulsi come on TV saying over 100 people were fired for it if it wasn't true?

Tulsi said 100 people got fired. She didn't say anything about these particular messages posted by this Christopher Rufo. At the moment, it's just a string of messages on a Twitter thread.

The messages sound like a bunch of retards in the Reddit transgender sub. Not professionals working in intelligence agencies.

But then again, there was a 5'4" fattie women working as a Secret Service agent, so maybe I'm wrong. I'll reserve judgment until we find out how true this is. Sounds like BS.
 
Tulsi said 100 people got fired. She didn't say anything about these particular messages posted by this Christopher Rufo. At the moment, it's just a string of messages on a Twitter thread.

The messages sound like a bunch of retards in the Reddit transgender sub. Not professionals working in intelligence agencies.

But then again, there was a 5'4" fattie women working as a Secret Service agent, so maybe I'm wrong. I'll reserve judgment until we find out how true this is. Sounds like BS.
She literally quoted rufo in her Twitter post. Look in the op, it's there.
 
This feels like pearl clutching to me. It's trans people talking about trans issues in a group chat. So long as they're also hitting their performance targets who gives a fuck?
 
She literally quoted rufo in her Twitter post. Look in the op, it's there.

I did hear her reference his name, but she didn't quote him or any of these particular messages.

I'm going to reserve judgment until we know more. Just sounds like BS because of how ridiculous the talk is and how uneducated they sound.
 
I did hear her reference his name, but she didn't quote him or any of these particular messages.

I'm going to reserve judgment until we know more. Just sounds like BS because of how ridiculous the talk is and how uneducated they sound.
What do you mean she didn't quote him? It's literally the first tweet in the first post of this thread.
 
What do you mean she didn't quote him? It's literally the first tweet in the first post of this thread.

I'm talking about her spoken interview on Fox News.

The quote tweet that she did referencing Christopher Rufo was only a few hours after his initial tweet. So no way for her to confirm all those messages were real.
 
Last edited:
I'm talking about her spoken interview on Fox News.

The quote tweet that she did referencing Christopher Rufo was only a few hours after his initial tweet. So no way for her to confirm all those messages were real.
How long do you think it takes to print out some logs? You can find out in a matter of minutes if you ask the it guys. This is the opposite of difficult.
 
How long do you think it takes to print out some logs? You can find out in a matter of minutes if you ask the it guys. This is the opposite of difficult.

But she didn't actually react to his post with the specific tweets. You're just assuming she printed out logs or whatever.

As I said, I'm reserving judgment until we see more. 🤷‍♀️
 
Last edited:
So the same people that said having racist group chats is normal is all of a sudden taking aim at group chats about things they don’t like?

Wow I’m shocked that conservatives have double standards

Who woulda thought ey..

Snowden said some guys at NSA were sharing stolen nudes and videos of famous and non famous women picked up by NSA mass surveillance.


Is Tulsi firing the horny degenerate heterosexual agents too or just the horny degenerate trans ones?
 
This feels like pearl clutching to me. It's trans people talking about trans issues in a group chat. So long as they're also hitting their performance targets who gives a fuck?
Same take.

If the issue is they're frittering away tons of government time on the taxpayer dollar, fine, but if that was the case, then wouldn't they be talking about these employees squandering x number of hours in these chatrooms while on the clock, or something like that? Why would I care what the character of the chats were unless it was compromising secure data? I wouldn't care if it was heterosexual chatter I was into; if they're wasting too much time not working, that's the issue. The content of the chats doesn't concern me unless it's suggesting something traitorous or negligent.

I don't care for this. It sounds like they're targeting these people based on their identities and sexuality rather than their work efficiency.
 
it seems pretty clear to me that using intelink for non-intelligence purposes was not allowed and those doing so should be punished. i feel it is fair to question the judgement of those guilty of donig so.

worthy of being fired? im not sure. but in the backdrop of many adequate gov employees with meaningful jobs and no violations being fired, i cant really be bothered to care much about those who have committed violations.
 
You don’t see us “Ever fully recovering from what’s being done?” <lol><lol><lol>

Don’t worry brother- I’m sure another Democrat will eventually get in power to re-hire all the DEI imbeciles and circus sideshow freaks, while blowing countless billions on overseas slush funds wars, and “foreign aid packages”.

If we don't nip this in the bud and make serious changes to our political system, I don't see ever fully recovering from what's being done. At least not anytime soon.
 
Listen , people are aloud to have these type of chats so long as it doesn't harm anybody, or organize violence towards anybody. That's free speech absolute. People are aloud to be sick fucking weirdos withing what's legal and what's not.

With that said, if this is on government time that's fireable. Heck if it's off the clock but through government channels that's still fireable . You don't get a pass because you think your a protected group. How did these people ever pass background checks or physch evaluations is beyond me.
 
You don’t see us “Ever fully recovering from what’s being done?” <lol><lol><lol>

Don’t worry brother- I’m sure another Democrat will eventually get in power to re-hire all the DEI imbeciles and circus sideshow freaks, while blowing countless billions on overseas slush funds wars, and “foreign aid packages”.
That's nice, I'm talking about Elon breaking laws with his little boy harem, fucking with the treasury and not even remotely trying to hide it, among many other things. Trump is also threatening war with Panama and Greenland and talking about putting troops on the ground in Gaza so your wars point isn't tracking
 
This feels like pearl clutching to me. It's trans people talking about trans issues in a group chat. So long as they're also hitting their performance targets who gives a fuck?
Issue is that it was a work group chat which is not allowed, especially when working in intel. The content of the chat is mostly irrelevant. But thats not what people care about. Trans bad as usual
 
Last edited:
Hearing these guys whine about national security is just the ripest sort of buffoonery and double standard. We literally gave barely pubescent Elon Musk tech bros access to the Treasury payment system.
True. And that’s bullshit as well.
 
Back
Top