Social Tucker Carlson Starstruck By Historian Who Calls Churchill, Not Hitler, the ‘Chief Villain’ of WW2 and Casts Holocaust as Accident

[OneOfOne]

Because that wasn't part of the treaty man


Anglo-Polish Military Alliance
In response to Nazi Germany’s occupation of Czechoslovakia, Britain and France pledged their support to Poland guaranteeing its independence in the face of Nazi aggression.

The United Kingdom, sensing a trend of German expansionism, sought to discourage German aggression by this show of solidarity. In a secret protocol of the pact, the United Kingdom offered assistance in the case of an attack on Poland specifically by Germany,[3] but in the case of attack by other countries, the parties were required only to "consult together on measures to be taken in common".[13]

Exactly. This further goes to show that Britain and France picked a fight with Germany. Germany and Poland were having a dispute and Britain decided to get involved as means to confront Germany. They didn't form their alliance until after Germany and Poland were already in dispute. They did this to provide a pathway for war.

They weren't concerned about Polands safety or autonomy, they didn't have any moral concerns, and they weren't being threatened by Germany. If they were concerned about these things then they would have confronted Communist expansion into Poland as well. And this all goes to show that Churchill and Co were to blame for starting the war. Germany made many appeals for peace and were rejected every single time.

 

[Anewt]

Exactly. This further goes to show that Britain and France picked a fight with Germany. Germany and Poland were having a dispute and Britain decided to get involved as means to confront Germany. They didn't form their alliance until after Germany and Poland were already in dispute. They did this to provide a pathway for war.

They weren't concerned about Polands safety or autonomy, they didn't have any moral concerns, and they weren't being threatened by Germany. If they were concerned about these things then they would have confronted Communist expansion into Poland as well. And this all goes to show that Churchill and Co were to blame for starting the war. Germany made many appeals for peace and were rejected every single time.

It is absolutely incredible you blame Britain and France for Germany invading........

I'm out

Stop watching nazi propaganda

 

[OneOfOne]

It is absolutely incredible you blame Britain and France for Germany invading........

I'm out

Stop watching nazi propaganda

I know it's nuts. The country declaring war and refusing countless peace proposals are the ones to blame for the war. Crazy

 

[Anewt]

I know it's nuts. The country declaring war and refusing countless peace proposals are the ones to blame for the war. Crazy

Somehow a official declaration of war means more to you than actually physically invading another country .

You're correct. You are crazy

 

[OneOfOne]

Somehow a official declaration of war means more to you than actually physically invading another country .

You're correct. You are crazy

You are conflating invading Poland with invading Britain. Germany didn't invade Britain yet Britain declared war on them. And it wasnt just a declaration of war but but actual attacks on Germany. But Germany is to blame. Ok.

I would say you're crazy but we all know you're just being dishonest.

 

[Mack Yancy]

In regards to WW2 it certainly appears that he bent over backwards to avoid conflict with everyone but the Communists.

Then why the fuck did he invade Poland?

 

[Mack Yancy]

It is absolutely incredible you blame Britain and France for Germany invading........

I'm out

Stop watching nazi propaganda

What you need to remember about @OneOfOne is that he doesn't actually have any firm beliefs, he's sort of a contrarian, but on top of that he's completely hypnotized by faux intellectualism.

The sad thing is that others like @PhitePhan and @GearSolidMetal ALSO think he's intelligent, which makes them take the shite he says at face value.

I know exactly where he gets all of his WW2 'knowledge' from, it's that godforsaken nazi apologist youtube channel 'Zoomer Historian', which I think @Sinister is aware of being brought up here before.



Now never mind that this is just some kid running defence for the nazis by quoting and stretching David Irving's claims, he sounds refined and informed, and that's what OneofOne desperately wants to be. He wants to be that calm, rational intellectual who effortlessly dispels his opponents with eloquent candour and considered rhetoric.

But it's all turd polishing, he's a stubborn dumbfuck who doesn't know his ass from his elbow. He refuses to do any of the intellectual legwork to become the paragon of facts he so desperately wants to be, so he just borrows and adopts where he can.

 

[GearSolidMetal]

The sad thing is that others like @PhitePhan and @GearSolidMetal ALSO think he's intelligent, which makes them take the shite he says at face value.

Wow... you must be really losing in this discussion to tag me in it saying 'You're not intelligent just like GearSolidMetal!'

Trust me, if you're that desperate, just take the L, just like @Kovalev's "Man Bag" is so desperate to argue that Abe Lincoln was gay that he took a quote of Lincoln's stepmother saying he 'wasn't fold of girls' during his teenage years to insinuate he was gay.

@Mack Yancy, just take the L in this discussion. Everyone will respect you more, bro.

 

[Mack Yancy]

Wow... you must be really losing in this discussion to tag me in it saying 'You're not intelligent just like GearSolidMetal!'

The funny thing is that OneOfOne isn't even debating me, he has me on ignore after I called him out for being a hypocrite.

You know when people complain about 'race baiting'? Well he's one of them. He got very upset when I pulled him up all of his 'Well as a black man..." posts and then he just kind of gave up and blocked.

But go ahead, tell me where he's right, and I'm wrong about Hitler in a debate we aren't even having. I'm sure you won't pivot away.

 

[Kovalev's "Man Bag"]

Wow... you must be really losing in this discussion to tag me in it saying 'You're not intelligent just like GearSolidMetal!'

Trust me, if you're that desperate, just take the L, just like @Kovalev's "Man Bag" is so desperate to argue that Abe Lincoln was gay that he took a quote of Lincoln's stepmother saying he 'wasn't fold of girls' during his teenage years to insinuate he was gay.

@Mack Yancy, just take the L in this discussion. Everyone will respect you more, bro.

There is no secondary interpretation. His stepmother admitted that he wasn't into girls much after he was gone. That's her reflecting on his personal life. Normal during grieving. Remember? Plus, you're the dip that has pretended that movie trailers need context. LOL. How ridiculous.

 

[GearSolidMetal]

There is no secondary interpretation. His stepmother admitted that he wasn't into girls much after he was gone. That's her reflecting on his personal life.

Wow... say you really don't know how to take an L without saying you really don't know how to take an L.

Do yourself a favor and go read the entire quote outloud to yourself, not that one sentence the entire letter.m, and realize what a complete fool you're being.

 

[Kovalev's "Man Bag"]

Wow... say you really don't know how to take an L without saying you really don't know how to take an L.

Do yourself a favor and go read the entire quote outloud to yourself, not that one sentence the entire letter.m, and realize what a complete fool you're being.

Do yourself a favor and stop making yourself look like a jackass. There's only one interpretation and it's the one that should be obvious to anyone (who doesn't have an agenda).

 

[OneOfOne]

Then why the fuck did he invade Poland?

Three reasons:

1. Polish were discriminatimg against and openly attacking Germans
2. They need direct access to East Germany
3. They were hoping to create a buffer against Communism to the east

Even then the Germans tried to resolve the issue diplomatically but as usual were rebuffed.

 

[OneOfOne]

What you need to remember about @OneOfOne is that he doesn't actually have any firm beliefs, he's sort of a contrarian, but on top of that he's completely hypnotized by faux intellectualism.

The sad thing is that others like @PhitePhan and @GearSolidMetal ALSO think he's intelligent, which makes them take the shite he says at face value.

I know exactly where he gets all of his WW2 'knowledge' from, it's that godforsaken nazi apologist youtube channel 'Zoomer Historian', which I think @Sinister is aware of being brought up here before.



Now never mind that this is just some kid running defence for the nazis by quoting and stretching David Irving's claims, he sounds refined and informed, and that's what OneofOne desperately wants to be. He wants to be that calm, rational intellectual who effortlessly dispels his opponents with eloquent candour and considered rhetoric.

But it's all turd polishing, he's a stubborn dumbfuck who doesn't know his ass from his elbow. He refuses to do any of the intellectual legwork to become the paragon of facts he so desperately wants to be, so he just borrows and adopts where he can.

In reality I've never heard of this YouTube channel. But maybe I should check it out. The fact you think this information is only available through an obscure YouTube channel is genuinely funny.

And if I had to venture to guess neither one of those posters agree with me on this let alone take what I'm saying at face value. And that's perfectly fine. I've never been afraid to stand out on a limb by myself.

This alternative view of WW2, like so many other things, will slowly become more acceptable and validated as time goes on. People will become less and less afraid of being called a Nazi, anti-Semetic, or whatever. The same world order running the show in the 30s is the same one running things today. We've seen the way this world order tells the world lies in order to demonize people and justify war. We've seen this world order make up stories about WMDs and babies in incubators to justify the invasion of Iraq. We've seen them fake events like the Gulf of Tonkin(led by Jim Morrison's father of all people) to justify the Vietnam War. We've witnessed the denomization of the Palestinians to justify the attacks on Gaza. We've seen the way they've turned the Jan 6th skirmish into an "insurrection" and "attack on democracy" in the minds of the population. Just to name a few. There's no reason to think they didn't use these same tactics in the 1930s. Especially when you begin to dig into the facts and details of the time.

 

[Mack Yancy]

Three reasons:

1. Polish were discriminatimg against and openly attacking Germans

This is nazi propaganda, the poles were discriminating against everyone non polish, including lithuanins and jews, this wasn't as targeted as you or the nazis were making it seem.

Also the Nazis greatly exaggerated the atrocities to include mass slaughter and the streets running red with blood of germans. They knew this was a lie at the time and we know it was a lie now.

But this is all kind of pointless. Just like with your claiming that FBI informants are the same as employed agents, you're just going to pivot and deflect. Also, this is ANOTHER of my threads your posting in after saying you were avoiding mine altogether.

 

[Romulas]

And the extermination camps?

I was considering them the same as concentration camps. They talk a lot about Dachau and how terrible it was.

 

[avenue94]

I was considering them the same as concentration camps. They talk a lot about Dachau and how terrible it was.

Concentration camps and extermination camps were very different. You aren't equipped to make claims about Nazi Germany or the USSR and their treatment of civilians if you don't understand the difference between those camps.

 

[Romulas]

Concentration camps and extermination camps were very different. You aren't equipped to make claims about Nazi Germany or the USSR and their treatment of civilians if you don't understand the difference between those camps.

The Russian communists utilizing left over Nazi built concentration or extermination camps didn't utilize them in the same way the Germans did so it doesn't matter which was which in their prior uses, does it?

I'm also not making claims. I'm reiterating what was said on the podcast/creator we're discussing.

Go argue with the people you disagree with...

 

[avenue94]

The Russian communists utilizing left over Nazi built concentration or extermination camps didn't utilize them in the same way the Germans did so it doesn't matter which was which in their prior uses, does it?

I'm also not making claims. I'm reiterating what was said on the podcast/creator we're discussing.

Go argue with the people you disagree with...

Did they reuse the extermination camps? And again you seen very unaware of how concentration camps differed from extermination camps.

Also, good to see yet another coward Nazi apologist. You post neo nazi filth and then when challenged on it you run away and claim you are just parroting someone else's talking points. In other words you're not only morally sleezy but too scared to own it.

 

[OneOfOne]

Did they reuse the extermination camps? And again you seen very unaware of how concentration camps differed from extermination camps.

Also, good to see yet another coward Nazi apologist. You post neo nazi filth and then when challenged on it you run away and claim you are just parroting someone else's talking points. In other words you're not only morally sleezy but too scared to own it.

Communist sympathizers shouldn't throw stones