• Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version.

Social Tucker Carlson Starstruck By Historian Who Calls Churchill, Not Hitler, the ‘Chief Villain’ of WW2 and Casts Holocaust as Accident

Mack Yancy

Brown Belt
@Brown
Joined
Nov 28, 2022
Messages
3,877
Reaction score
4,116
Tucker:
Darryl Cooper may be the best and most honest popular historian in the United States.
His latest project is the most forbidden of all: trying to understand World War Two.

Tucker:
“You know, Churchill’s the good guy, Neville Chamberlain’s the bad guy. You know it’s just, it’s too pat, it’s too, obviously, quite banal. But it also has justified, like, the killing of millions of people since the end of the Second World War. And so I do think it’s fair to ask like ‘What really was going on?’ So for example, I’m American, I’m not English so I don’t have any weird motive in asking this but how would you assess Winston Churchill?”

Of Churchill, Cooper told Calson, “Now, he didn’t kill the most people, he didn’t commit the most atrocities, but I believe... that when you get into it and tell the story right and don’t leave anything out, you see that he was primarily responsible for that war becoming what it did,” Cooper told Carlson.




Check the timestamps for the WW2 discussion.


Also Elon Musk said that the interview was interesting and worth a watch, but has since deleted that.
 
Tucker:
Darryl Cooper may be the best and most honest popular historian in the United States.
His latest project is the most forbidden of all: trying to understand World War Two.

Tucker:
“You know, Churchill’s the good guy, Neville Chamberlain’s the bad guy. You know it’s just, it’s too pat, it’s too, obviously, quite banal. But it also has justified, like, the killing of millions of people since the end of the Second World War. And so I do think it’s fair to ask like ‘What really was going on?’ So for example, I’m American, I’m not English so I don’t have any weird motive in asking this but how would you assess Winston Churchill?”

Of Churchill, Cooper told Calson, “Now, he didn’t kill the most people, he didn’t commit the most atrocities, but I believe... that when you get into it and tell the story right and don’t leave anything out, you see that he was primarily responsible for that war becoming what it did,” Cooper told Carlson.




Check the timestamps for the WW2 discussion.


Also Elon Musk said that the interview was interesting and worth a watch, but has since deleted that.

Not surprised that they would spread this BS given the people involved. Elon being a D-Bag and a white supremacist is par for the course. X/Twitter is a cesspool now.
 
Tucker “doesn’t” believe in evolution but you have to know that he’s grifting to the dumbest echelon of society aka MAGA simps. So this flamboyant take is not really that surprising from him.
 
Churchills got a better case to be considered a villian of WW1 given the Anglo-German naval scare and Gallipoli.

In WW2 Churchills more a fraud as a hero than a "villian". He was right to hate Hitler hes just not really responsible for the Allies winning WW2 and would have had to give up the fight(I don't mean surrender, I mean make peace) eventually if Hitler didn't declare war on the US.
 
Churchill was definitely the lesser of the 3 evils, but between those 3 I would put Hitler is second place behind Stalin.

Stalin was about as evil as you can get. Yes Hitler was a monster and killed a lot of people, but Stalin killed HIS OWN people.

Throughout history there have been monsters like Hitler... Genghis Khan, Alexander, Julius Caesar... all these dudes are kinda romanticized today, but they were pretty much just like Hitler, killed a lot of people in the name of expanding their own empires and elevating their own people.

Stalin on the other hand killed millions of his own people in the name of a bullshit ideology, next level monster.
 
Churchill was a villain in the scheme of things but when it comes to WW2? Not on the level of others at all

Is this guy actually considered a “respected historian” in the states or is he a David Iriving type character?
He doesn't even have a wikipedia page that I can see. And if this is him:


It looks like essentially nobody has ever read anything he's published.

It shouldn't be surprising Tucker is interviewing cans like this. Last I saw of him he was in flip flops interviewing some guy named Cat Turd who posts on Twitter. Hard times since he got cucked by Rupert Murdoch!

Also loved that fantastic piece of journalism where he went to Russia and was fascinated that they have bread in their supermarkets. Wonders of civilization we Americans can only dream of.
 
Last edited:
Churchill was definitely the lesser of the 3 evils, but between those 3 I would put Hitler is second place behind Stalin.

Stalin was about as evil as you can get. Yes Hitler was a monster and killed a lot of people, but Stalin killed HIS OWN people.

Throughout history there have been monsters like Hitler... Genghis Khan, Alexander, Julius Caesar... all these dudes are kinda romanticized today, but they were pretty much just like Hitler, killed a lot of people in the name of expanding their own empires and elevating their own people.

Stalin on the other hand killed millions of his own people in the name of a bullshit ideology, next level monster.
Hitler killed his own people too lol.
 
I like Daryl Coopers podcast. I dont have the knowledge to even begin to vet if his claims are true, false, or somewhere in between, but he doesnt seem like someone who isnt well researched.

Its clear to see today how opposing narratives emerge and how they can be distorted even by good faith interpretations so its not insane to think historical cases are just as susceptible, maybe even more so.
 
Hitler killed his own people too lol.
I'm sure every leader did it to some degree, but none of them can hold a candle to Stalin... except that other commie shitbag Mao.
 
I like Daryl Coopers podcast. I dont have the knowledge to even begin to vet if his claims are true, false, or somewhere in between, but he doesnt seem like someone who isnt well researched.

Its clear to see today how opposing narratives emerge and how they can be distorted even by good faith interpretations so its not insane to think historical cases are just as susceptible, maybe even more so.
But i mean... the timelines don't match up too well here, do they?

The rise of fascism in Spain with the Spanish civil war, Japan invading China, Germany invading Poland, The Soviet Union invading Finland - all invents integral the outbreak of the chaos that happened, happened before Churchill was in charge.

Chamberlain is seen in a negative light because he tried to appease Hitler and Hitler just moonwalked into a new territory in response. Austria, Sudetenland, Poland, Norway, etc.
 
I see a good amount of that sentiment pointed at Winston Churchill. Piers Morgan has debated people several times on whether Churchill should be considered a War Criminal or not. I'm no WW2 historian by any means, but I don't think we can look at Churchill through today's lens. They want to look at the bombing of Dresden as the best example and on paper it certainly is. Human beings are brutal creatures and sometimes it takes a monster to defeat a monster. When the entire world is at stake in a situation like WW2, you're going to see the parties fighting turn to any means to avoid annihilation. Look at the atomic bombs. Imagine that dropping those bombs on Japan wound up being the "less people will die" scenario the U.S. went with. War is hell.
 
But i mean... the timelines don't match up too well here, do they?

The rise of fascism in Spain with the Spanish civil war, Japan invading China, Germany invading Poland, The Soviet Union invading Finland - all invents integral the outbreak of the chaos that happened, happened before Churchill was in charge.

Chamberlain is seen in a negative light because he tried to appease Hitler and Hitler just moonwalked into a new territory in response. Austria, Sudetenland, Poland, Norway, etc.
I have no clue, sorry.
 
He doesn't even have a wikipedia page that I can see. And if this is him:


It looks like essentially nobody has ever read anything he's published.

It shouldn't be surprising Tucker is interviewing cans like this. Last I saw of him he was in flip flops interviewing some guy named Cat Turd who posts on Twitter. Hard times see he got cucked by Rupert Murdoch!

Also loved that fantastic piece of journalism where he went to Russia and was fascinated that they have bread in their supermarkets. Wonders of civilization we Americans can only dream of.
Yeah but he got 478 billion views that is a completely real and not made up number.
 
Back
Top