- Joined
- Sep 18, 2013
- Messages
- 58,705
- Reaction score
- 33,464
Says the guy who is arguing against people taking their posts seriously?
No, I made an obvious joke post, and then a more serious post several posts later, you weirdo.
Says the guy who is arguing against people taking their posts seriously?
Also its not a mistake, this is by design, these corrupt people will reap as much as they can and then bail out with their golden parachutes.
which is a call to unionization essentially.I'm not asking for democratic redistribution.
I'm asking the employers to start paying their employees a fair share in every industry.
How long do we have to look at record profits before you drones wake up and ask for your share?
which is a call to unionization essentially.
unionization has no leverage in a technological society due to the ability to outsource and or technologically innovate.
walmart workers have ZERO leverage to unionize.
the root problem of human obsolescence still exists.
i think unionization still has its place, if you can bargain you should. but as time goes on you wont be able to.
"Fair share" is a bargaining problem, the root problem isnt bargaining.
Where do they work outside of the us? in niche manufacuring im guessing (where outsourcing or automation is cost prohibitive)Yeah...unions tend to work everywhere else but the US.
"Right to work" laws have a good deal to do with that. We've cut the knees out from under unionization and are now blaming it on technology. What a world.
Yeah...unions tend to work everywhere else but the US.
This thread was created last Tuesday morning you numbskull.TS is a real fucking Nostradamus, posting this AFTER the worst two day point drop in years and years...
And we are entering an era when this economic system is going to produce FAR more losers than winners and the disparity between the two will grow. I think this is when we need to start asking some basic questions about the social contract and purpose of the economy.the root cause of economic problems isnt cost of living but lack of opportunity brought upon through technological innovation.
the more people are needed the easier it will be for them to live
the less people are needed the more they will pay for rent and food.
if you try to subsidize rent, food cost will increase
if you food stamp rent increases
if you do both debt increases ect.
This thread was created last Tuesday morning you numbskull.
And it was Taleb that's Nostradamus, I'm just smart enough to recognize genius.
You liberals are some jealous fuck boys.
I'm not a genius, just really fucking smart.
So just to get this straight: you were smart enough to recognize this "genius" but Dear Leader wasn't?
How can this be? Is Trump not quite the "stable genius" he claims to be, or are you a SUPER genius???
A "mistake" is when you make an error based on fallibility.I'm not a genius, just really fucking smart.
Trump made a mistake & Taleb pointed out.
Says the guy who is arguing against people taking their posts seriously?
And what do you do when the companies that you're looking to pay better outsource your shit or simply move operations to another country because they don't feel like sharing?I'm not asking for democratic redistribution.
I'm asking the employers to start paying their employees a fair share in every industry.
How long do we have to look at record profits before you drones wake up and ask for your share?
And what do you do when the companies that you're looking to pay better outsource your shit or simply move operations to another country because they don't feel like sharing?
You sound lazy.
I'm not asking for democratic redistribution.
I'm asking the employers to start paying their employees a fair share in every industry.
How long do we have to look at record profits before you drones wake up and ask for your share?
Reagan's economic advisor and H.W. Bush's treasury director: