• Xenforo is upgrading us to version 2.3.7 on Tuesday Aug 19, 2025 at 01:00 AM BST (date has been pushed). This upgrade includes several security fixes among other improvements. Expect a temporary downtime during this process. More info here

Social Trump's Approval Rating Plummets

I'm praying to god you'll go away? Thats one the cringiest things I've read in a while.


Well, here you go dumbass - https://www.vox.com/23036340/biden-american-rescue-plan-inflation


Many economists warned of overheating the economy and considering we were already started to recover, the ARP did just that.



And before you start beating your strawmen again, I never said Biden was the only factor. Only a hack like you would argue he had no role.



Its hilarious how you moved the goal post and expect my to defend something I never said. What did I say? I said Biden was pushing for it. You asked for a source and after I pulled it up you said you weren't going to read it. You did that because you're a clown.


And what happened to comment on illegal immigration? Don't think I didn't notice you won't go near that one.
Everybody knows Biden’s term was a disaster. You’re either arguing with a gaslighter or a complete retard.

That admin didn’t win a single swing state for reelection and the old man so far gone he couldn’t even run.

I mean in just 4 years the national consensus changed from “anyone but Trump” to “at least Trump wasn’t as bad as Biden”
 
Everybody knows Biden’s term was a disaster. You’re either arguing with a gaslighter or a complete retard.

That admin didn’t win a single swing state for reelection and the old man so far gone he couldn’t even run.

I mean in just 4 years the national consensus changed from “anyone but Trump” to “at least Trump wasn’t as bad as Biden”
LMAO @ national consensus. 32% of the American voting-age population voted for him, and 31% for Harris. More people didn't vote at all than voted for either of them. I'd wager things would have turned out differently if the electoral college were eliminated.

"State winner-take-all laws encourage candidates to focus disproportionately on a limited set of swing states, as small changes in the popular vote in those states produce large changes in the electoral college vote.

For example, in the 2016 election, a shift of 2,736 votes (or less than 0.4% of all votes cast) toward Donald Trump in New Hampshire would have produced a four electoral vote gain for his campaign. A similar shift in any other state would have produced no change in the electoral vote, thus encouraging the campaign to focus on New Hampshire above other states. A study by FairVote reported that the 2004 candidates devoted three-quarters of their peak season campaign resources to just five states, while the other 45 states received very little attention. The report also stated that 18 states received no candidate visits and no TV advertising.[8] This means that swing state issues receive more attention, while issues important to other states are largely ignored.[9][10][11]

State winner-take-all laws tend to decrease voter turnout in states without close races. Voters living outside the swing states have a greater certainty of which candidate is likely to win their state. This knowledge of the probable outcome decreases their incentive to vote.[9][11] A report by The Center for Information and Research on Civic Learning and Engagement (CIRCLE) found that turnout among eligible voters under age 30 was 64.4% in the ten closest battleground states and only 47.6% in the rest of the country – a 17% gap.[12]

The current Electoral College system allows a candidate to win the Presidency while losing the popular vote, an outcome seen as counter to the one person, one vote principle of democracy.[13]"
 
LMAO @ national consensus. 32% of the American voting-age population voted for him, and 31% for Harris. More people didn't vote at all than voted for either of them. I'd wager things would have turned out differently if the electoral college were eliminated.

"State winner-take-all laws encourage candidates to focus disproportionately on a limited set of swing states, as small changes in the popular vote in those states produce large changes in the electoral college vote.

For example, in the 2016 election, a shift of 2,736 votes (or less than 0.4% of all votes cast) toward Donald Trump in New Hampshire would have produced a four electoral vote gain for his campaign. A similar shift in any other state would have produced no change in the electoral vote, thus encouraging the campaign to focus on New Hampshire above other states. A study by FairVote reported that the 2004 candidates devoted three-quarters of their peak season campaign resources to just five states, while the other 45 states received very little attention. The report also stated that 18 states received no candidate visits and no TV advertising.[8] This means that swing state issues receive more attention, while issues important to other states are largely ignored.[9][10][11]

State winner-take-all laws tend to decrease voter turnout in states without close races. Voters living outside the swing states have a greater certainty of which candidate is likely to win their state. This knowledge of the probable outcome decreases their incentive to vote.[9][11] A report by The Center for Information and Research on Civic Learning and Engagement (CIRCLE) found that turnout among eligible voters under age 30 was 64.4% in the ten closest battleground states and only 47.6% in the rest of the country – a 17% gap.[12]

The current Electoral College system allows a candidate to win the Presidency while losing the popular vote, an outcome seen as counter to the one person, one vote principle of democracy.[13]"
Didn’t read.

I only care about outcomes. Kamala, and by extension Biden got bitch slapped in that election. Not even a single swing state. Sad.
 
Last edited:
I'm sure Trump is super worked about about this poll. After all, without good polling, he won't be willing or able to do anything for the next 3 and a half years...

Leftist trash will be able to stop Trump in his tracks as long as they can keep pushing out bad polls.
 
His approval is not very important anymore. Why would he care if he’s popular?
 
He's an economic terrorist, His tariff's are going to hurt more people then it helps including his own people. I think he enjoys trying to bully and blackmail companies into moving their production to the states even though it really wont work.
 
He's an economic terrorist, His tariff's are going to hurt more people then it helps including his own people. I think he enjoys trying to bully and blackmail companies into moving their production to the states even though it really wont work.
If big as an example car companies move literally all their production here from the drawing boards to actual manufacturing off the production lines to people driving them off the forecourt he'll be long dead and buried. That's a good 8-10 year timeline. We are NEVER with tech going to have a 100% made in this country TV, phone, car, computer. It would cost us a flippin fortune.

And these fucking tariffs, his lemmings STILL believe this moron saying the countries are picking up the tab for it. WE are paying for it.
 
If big as an example car companies move literally all their production here from the drawing boards to actual manufacturing off the production lines to people driving them off the forecourt he'll be long dead and buried. That's a good 8-10 year timeline. We are NEVER with tech going to have a 100% made in this country TV, phone, car, computer. It would cost us a flippin fortune.

And these fucking tariffs, his lemmings STILL believe this moron saying the countries are picking up the tab for it. WE are paying for it.
Yep, tariffs are no different then a tax, the government gets the money and the people pay for it. He makes it sound like the other countries are the ones paying for it but it's simply a lie. His clapping seals are the only ones who think its a good idea, I'm not sure any economic experts thinks this is a good idea.
 
Yep, tariffs are no different then a tax, the government gets the money and the people pay for it. He makes it sound like the other countries are the ones paying for it but it's simply a lie. His clapping seals are the only ones who think its a good idea, I'm not sure any economic experts thinks this is a good idea.
A lot of his MAGA adorers are in impoverished areas who don't have two pennies to rub together so bugger knows where they're getting their news from. I saw a Walmart comparison the other day of how much prices had gone up. And Mango Molester was saying they should swallow it.
 
Good post, but it only tells part of the phenomena.

Clever people have not been fooled, but they put themselves in a position where they have to say they believe Trump because of their blind hate of democrats. Others go along with the plan because they don't want to ruin their career.

Look at Gabbard. She's very clever, but embraced her role to divert attention on the Epstein files. It's easy to sow doubts in a base that believes many CTs.
There are those who back trump even they know what he his only because it gives them power and or money

It's them we should loath not the dumb people believing his lies .... Well loath more at least
 
Back
Top