Social Trump's Approval Rating Plummets

Who is crying? You?

Anyone upset that Harris was selected based on some criteria other than being the most qualified candidate but not equally upset about every other VP pick in history that also was not selected because they were the most qualified.

I think that could be pretty obvious
 
Anyone upset that Harris was selected based on some criteria other than being the most qualified candidate but not equally upset about every other VP pick in history that also was not selected because they were the most qualified.

I think that could be pretty obvious
You brought this up as DEI. I defined DEI and you ran away.
 
And you're ignoring the fact that the VP has never, in the history of America, been selected based on who was the MOST qualified. Do you think Dan Quayle was the most qualified? Sarah Palin? Vance?

But you only cry about it when it's Harris.
And you're defending discrimination by pointing out there were bad picks in the past. Vance's skin color wasn't a prerequisite for him to get the spot.
 
And you're defending discrimination by pointing out there were bad picks in the past. Vance's skin color wasn't a prerequisite for him to get the spot.

Just being connected to a wealthy billionaire donor.

What I'm pointing out is that the VP selection is inherently political. A person might be picked because they are popular in a battleground state. They might be picked to satisfy a subgroup of the party (like Lyndon Johnson with southern Democrats or Pence with evangelical Christians). They might be picked because they ran a successful primary campaign and securing the support of their voters is politically necessary to unify the party. Or someone might just straight up buy the VP like Vance. Biden saying he was going to select a black woman as VP is not inherently worse than any of these reasons for selecting a VP (actually, its quite a bit better than just flat out selling it like Trump did). What matters is that the person is qualified. Harris was qualified.
 
Last edited:
Was the pool of candidates limited based on immutable characteristics? No.
So when Trump said he was putting a woman on the Supreme Court , nominated Amy Comey Barrett that was not a DEI hire or it’s OK if President Cankles does the DEI hiring? That is why MAGA can’t be taken seriously, they only hate things if someone else does it, but if Trump does it, they ignore it or pretend it never happened, like the Epstein Files.
 
By definition she was a DEI pick. Are you denying that?

If you're using it in a disparaging way to imply that she was unqualified then yes. If you're not using it in a disparaging way and only as an acknowledgment that race and gender was a part of the criteria used in her selection then no. Race and gender played a role in the selection of Tim Kaine and Tim Walz too. Gender played a role in the selection of Sarah Palin and Geraldine Ferraro. Trump considered Tim Scott and Kristi Noem for the VP and race/gender was definitely a factor (unfortunately for them, money was a bigger factor)

Most MAGA use it in a disparaging way.
 
So when Trump said he was putting a woman on the Supreme Court , nominated Amy Comey Barrett that was not a DEI hire or it’s OK if President Cankles does the DEI hiring? That is why MAGA can’t be taken seriously, they only hate things if someone else does it, but if Trump does it, they ignore it or pretend it never happened, like the Epstein Files.

He also followed the unwritten rule of replacing a minority justice with someone in the same group when he nominated her to replace Ruth Bader Ginsburg (a precedent that was started by George Bush Sr when he nominated Clarence Thomas to replace Thurgood Marshall). Barrett's seat is literally a DEI seat by their own definition.
 
Biden's competent people lead us to record inflation, the worst border crisis in the history of the country, and pushed for sex operations for children. They didn't have a leg to stand on at election time and let a fat orange imbecile beat them.

Sure sure.
You've got some sources on your obvious bullshit hysterics?

Give me the stats for sex change operations on children between 2016 and 2020.

Please explain which of Biden's policies caused "record inflation" and how.

Biden brought us the Chips Act, Inflationary Reduction Act which pulled us out of COVID, and invested in infrastructure like repairing roads, building highways, etc. I can happily provide sources if you want.

Hell, I'll allow you to show me where ANY republican within the last 50 years has introduced a policy initiative that improved the lives of regular Americans over time. Give me just one and show me how this actually was in the best interest of people like you, because I can show you a number of things Democrats introduced that improved people's lives.

You morons bitch about Democrats increasing your taxes, but you are too stupid to understand that your taxes are high because every time the Republicans take office they give tax breaks to the rich, which shifts the burden to the middle class. Newsflash: when one of two paying groups pays less, the other group is forced to pick up the slack - it doesn't matter if we are talking about a bill for a meal, the rent, or taxes. Your taxes continually get higher for one primary reason. Because the people who command most of the wealth in this country are continually paying less. Thanks to Republicans and morons like you who buy in to their 24/7 propaganda network which dominates the media sphere.

Either provide some substance, or go back to getting that dopamine hit from the 144 character no-thought-required kiddie pool of outrage porn that you apparently wade in daily.

Biden at least tried to do some things for ordinary people. Trump is actively making things worse for everyday people. As has every republican and their singular policy of trickle down over the last 50 years. They only get away with it because they convince a bunch of low iq white dudes that brown people (or Muslims, or gays, or communists, or trannies) are ruining their lives. Your post above perfectly demonstrates this in real-time - you have a bunch of vague grievances that are made of nothing more than hot air - because that's what your X feed told you.
 
So when Trump said he was putting a woman on the Supreme Court , nominated Amy Comey Barrett that was not a DEI hire or it’s OK if President Cankles does the DEI hiring? That is why MAGA can’t be taken seriously, they only hate things if someone else does it, but if Trump does it, they ignore it or pretend it never happened, like the Epstein Files.
That was a DEI hire if he said it was going to be a woman.
 
He also followed the unwritten rule of replacing a minority justice with someone in the same group when he nominated her to replace Ruth Bader Ginsburg (a precedent that was started by George Bush Sr when he nominated Clarence Thomas to replace Thurgood Marshall). Barrett's seat is literally a DEI seat by their own definition.
Yes. It is.
 
You've got some sources on your obvious bullshit hysterics?
Sure.




Inb4 you say its (D)ifferent and explain why its not the democrats fault and rant about Trump like you just did.
 
If exaggeration had a name.

Sure you still believe that "don't say gay " was in that bill years ago to this date
Yeah, you got nothing, not an original thought in that thick skull of yours.

Nope, I thought that “don’t say gay” stuff was really stupid. Big swing and a miss.
 
She wasn’t up ? Again I’m not sure you understand how polls work , someone can be up and still lose the presidency are you aware this happens and has happened in the past ? We are also not talking who’s up,or down this poll is solely on Trump himself,really this shouldn’t be that difficult .
I'm not sure you understand what I post
 
Not sure he left in 2020 , I guess we will wait and see . The dems shouldn’t even get a candidate for 2028 until Trump leaves office in these conditional crisis times
He left in 2020 claiming he was robbed and a mob (amoing others )tried to keep him in , have you forgotten that ?

Please clarify what you mean by "The dems shouldn’t even get a candidate for 2028 until Trump leaves office in these conditional crisis times" because that's sounding alot like Germany in 33 to me .
 
I am still amazed people White Knight a dude with cankles.
What kind of low T man are you constantly defending a dude with cankles? I guess I grew up differently, we made fun of people with cankles, hoping that motivated their fat asses to lose some damn weight. America is a reflection of their leader and has become soft just like Trump’s ankles.

Now we know why Trump is always doing pressers sitting down a lot lately. Those cankles can’t support his weight for more than getting out of a golf cart to hit a ball and then get back in too sit down.

Cankles and wears makeup.
Dude is turning into Mimi for the Drew Carey show.
 
Well Mike Johnson seems to be slowly moving away from Trump. Tom Masse and Nancy Mace are not backing down. There are others but democrat voters thanking Masse.
 
well this thread has certainly gone off the rails.
 
Back
Top