Law Trump wants to modify the 25th amendment, so that Harris can be impeached.

[Prefect]

And Mitch McConnell was calling for the Dems to use the judicial and jail him for what he did.

Both the McConnell and McCarthy condemned Trump, directly for Jan 5th.

The only reason the Republi'cans' did not take out Trump was because they could not imagine the Dem's and DoJ would be so incompetent and feckless in doing it.

The Republi'cans' were desperately hoping the DoJ would take him out for them, so they could condemn it all the way and hope to inherit the Trump magat base. They knew if they took Trump down themselves, they would lose his hard core base and win back the party but not be able to win elections.

If Trump is to win, i think Garland has to get the bulk of blame. He has been a disaster as AG. He should have appointed at least one if not 3 Special Counsels to investigate so many aspects of Trumps criminality, within a month of taking office. Instead he waited until Trump declared and it is only because Trump declared historically early, thinking it would protect him, did Garland finally do it. He had every reasons to do it, from month 1 saying 'investigating the former POTUS requires a arms length approach'.

no one thinks Trumps DoJ, lead by Bill Barr would have been so feckless if that was the situation Trump faced from Obama, trying to stay in for a 3rd term.

I always thought that the reason democrats didn't go hard at Trump is that it would create considerable unrest and that it would be better to do everything to undermine and prosecute him and have the nation watch him lose an actual election rather than a one part hunt on a former president. The democrats in my opinion were more interested in getting the information to the public and letting them make a choice rather than prosecuting him.

 

[ChosenOne]

I always thought that the reason democrats didn't go hard at Trump is that it would create considerable unrest and that it would be better to do everything to undermine and prosecute him and have the nation watch him lose an actual election rather than a one part hunt on a former president. The democrats in my opinion were more interested in getting the information to the public and letting them make a choice rather than prosecuting him.

Ya i don't think so. You saw enormous frustration in the House and Senate that Garland was not acting and sitting back and they initiated a campaign, including the Jan6th Committee to try and shame and embarrass him and force his hand to act by laying out the criminality in the most public way.

Not prosecuting Trump and taking him off the playing field, 2 years ago, when verdicts would have been coming in, with a Bill Barr as AG and Trump as POTUS, is what is causing all this unrest. I think most of the hard core Trumpers expected he would be prosecuted and lose immediately after the insurrection and they were writing him off and ready to move past him.

I am sure some of his hardest core magats would have seen their head explode, but most across the country would have 'shrugged' at him going to jail, in 2022, for what he did, had the investigations been started when they should have been. Trump's lie about 'political prosecutions' had not yet taken and most thought any prosecution coming would be 'just'.

 

[Goatenstein]

Trump is such a whiny ass bitch crybaby.

 

[Bob Gray]

Old people sundown. At Reagan's worse you saw stuff like this where his wife is just telling him what to say.

Dude, stop. I gave you a 12 minute speech and you give me a 15 second clip.

Take the L on this one. At no point did anyone have any issues with Reagan being a "drooling retard" when he was in office.

 

[Prefect]

Dude, stop. I gave you a 12 minute speech and you give me a 15 second clip.

Take the L on this one. At no point did anyone have any issues with Reagan being a "drooling retard" when he was in office.

Old people commonly sundown. Look it up dick tracy.

 

[Bob Gray]

Old people commonly sundown. Look it up dick tracy.

You're flailing now. Just stop. Your argument is "Reagan was a drooling retard". Now prove it. You have nothing and you know it. "Old people sundown" is not an argument for "This old guy is a retard".

Maybe you have a 20 second clip to post in response to a 20 minute farewell speech?

 

[LangfordBarrow]

Dude, stop. I gave you a 12 minute speech and you give me a 15 second clip.

Take the L on this one. At no point did anyone have any issues with Reagan being a "drooling retard" when he was in office.

How old are you? I was still underage at the time but I remember this being an issue towards the end of his second term.

 

[Bob Gray]

How old are you? I was still underage at the time but I remember this being an issue towards the end of his second term.

In my 40's.

They called him a "drooling retard" did they?

 

[LangfordBarrow]

In my 40's.

They called him a "drooling retard" did they?

No they called him "drippy dick"...

It was an issue that he had dementia or alzheimers. Are you a Biden fan? Have you posted here that he has dementia? It was worse with Reagan towards the end. Anyone older than I am please correct me if I'm wrong.

 

[LostMyBlackBelt]

Traitor Trump argued that the VP gets to certify the election winner. That is Harris! Trump is a fucking moron.

 

[Bob Gray]

No they called him "drippy dick"...

It was an issue that he had dementia or alzheimers. Are you a Biden fan? Have you posted here that he has dementia? It was worse with Reagan towards the end. Anyone older than I am please correct me if I'm wrong.

The Gipper and The Great Communicator were far more popular nicknames, I assure you.

No, I'm not a fan of Biden. I don't why that would matter.

I posted his 20 minute speech and I got a 15 second clip in response. If anyone wants to actually show anything tangible that Reagan was a "drooling retard" while in office, feel free. "I remember someone saying", or "it came out 10 years after he left office that..." or a 10 second clip of something isn't going to cut it.

Every president has critics and criticisms. Many of them valid. But Reagan was never at any point getting similar criticisms that Biden was getting.

You might argue that in an internet age that may have been a possibility. OK, maybe. But it wasn't. His mental competency was never in question during his presidency.