Law Trump wants to modify the 25th amendment, so that Harris can be impeached.

[Madmick]

Most of the examples were journalists though and I did acknowledge Pelosi.

Yes indeed and what were the circumstances around that? Oh yeah, Trump tried to prevent the peaceful transfer of power.

Still trying to snark from the floor. Amazing.

Don't ask stupid rhetorical questions.

 

[Islam Imamate]

Still trying to snark from the floor. Amazing.

Don't ask stupid rhetorical questions.

Yeah let's just completely ignore why the 25th might've been invoked in the wake of Jan 6th, perfectly reasonable.

 

[Madmick]

People on the left wouldn't really have any legs to stand on and complain about this, if true. They were throwing around invoking the 25th amendment before Trump was even sworn in.

Who is "they" here? Any specifics?

...

Yeah let's just completely ignore why the 25th might've been invoked in the wake of Jan 6th, perfectly reasonable.

Concession accepted.

Don't ask dumb rhetorical questions.

 

[Deleted member 267581]

If you don't want the back of the hand just take the L and skedaddle after the sting from the front.

Instead, you tried firing a cheapshot from your back at @Confucamus while also downplaying the brunt of the facts I presented to you as "just journos" instead of just accepting that Schumer and Pelosi were the freaking leaders of the Democratic party at the time.


*Edit* Oh, and spare us all the faux 'aw shucks' innocent routine about it not being a rhetorical question. Or is your memory really this poor? Because you yourself mentioned the 25th just a little over a month ago, and in the blurb at the top of the article you linked Pelosi's name is mentioned as the one who was threatening it:

To be fair, most the shit you posted was journalists. Didn’t house republicans also vote to impeach Biden?


Not to mention Jan 6th is unprecedented time lol.

 

[Islam Imamate]

...

Concession accepted.

Don't ask dumb rhetorical questions.

One of the examples involves threatening the 25th after Trump tried to prevent the peaceful transfer of power and still wouldn't concede the election, if that's not the time to threaten the 25th then I don't know when you ever would. Bringing it up when Trump got COVID was one thing but after Jan 6th it was absolutely called for.

 

[Deleted member 267581]

...

Concession accepted.

Don't ask dumb rhetorical questions.

Most of the shit you pulled was journalists

One of the examples involves threatening the 25th after Trump tried to prevent the peaceful transfer of power and still wouldn't concede the election, if that's not the time to threaten the 25th then I don't know when you ever would. Bringing it up when Trump got COVID was one thing but after Jan 6th it was absolutely called for.

White washing Jan 6th as if that were a joke is laughable. The fake elector scheme that Trump and his loyalists tried to pull off should never be forgotten.

If Obama did that republicans wouldn’t have stopped until he was hung from a tree

 

[Bob Gray]

Reagan was drooling retarded while he was in office as opposed to Trump just being a retard who shits his pants.

WTF are you talking about?


This was his final speech as president. You can look up basically ANY time Reagan had a microphone and he would absolutely destroy the slobs running in 2024. Or practically any year.

 

[Islam Imamate]

White washing Jan 6th as if that were a joke is laughable. The fake elector scheme that Trump and his loyalists tried to pull off should never be forgotten.

If Obama did that republicans wouldn’t have stopped until he was hung from a tree

Pelosi musing about the 25th when Trump got COVID is inappropriate that I can admit but acting like it was uncalled for after Jan 6th doesn't make sense to me in the slightest.

 

[Madmick]

Most of the shit you pulled was journalists

White washing Jan 6th as if that were a joke is laughable. The fake elector scheme that Trump and his loyalists tried to pull off should never be forgotten.

If Obama did that republicans wouldn’t have stopped until he was hung from a tree

The leaders of the Democratic party are not journalists. Other congressionally elected representatives are not mere journalists. Law professors are also not journalists by trade, but I'm not surprised you guys would ignorantly designate those from other primary professions who pen Op-Eds as "journalists". On top of it all, nowhere did @Confucamus state that he was only referring to elected representatives when he mentioned "Democrats". So this was a goalpost you guys invented from the beginning.

Kind of unbelievable that you guys don't have the sense to just take the L, lick your wounds, and limp away without anyone noticing how far down your own throats you stuck your feet. Ironically, I came in here to roll my eyes at Trump. It's such a silly, futile braindropping he floated like he always does.

But it isn't an irrelevant reminder to mention that this tango has been a two-sided dance. Democrats have also made a mockery of political procedure over the past eight years. They forever cheapened impeachment. Rather than rising above what Republicans did with Garland, they got just as dirty, and excessively politicized SCOTUS approval with their disgraceful character assassination campaigns against Kavanaugh and Coney Barrett. Prominent Democratic intellectuals have proposed dissolving how the Supreme Court works altogether, because they cannot tolerate enduring a generation of conservative judicial majority, and spoiler alert, if Harris wins, we'll be revisiting those ideas. Democrats will find a way to pack the court if they believe they have the votes in the necessary places to do it. In the meantime, they threw a tantrum attempting to introduce the "No Kings Act" to upend Presidential immunity because they refuse to accept the authority of that court. And they routinely assail the 2nd Amendment.

The Democrats have not treated the Constitution or other longstanding cows as sacred. Trump's idea is stupid. That's enough. Pretending he's the only one who tries to inappropriately bend our political institutions to his partisan will is untenable.

 

[cincymma79]

This is it. People seem to forget we're voting not only for the leader but the people who support them day to day. I can't get behind Gaetz, Marjorie Trailerpark Greene, Lauren Blowtart. I don't really want those 3 leading our government.

if I ever see anyone from that anybody from that Cabinet in a restaurant, in a department store, at a gasoline station, I’ll get out and I’ll create a crowd. I’ll push back on them. And you tell them they're not welcome anymore, anywhere

 

[jefferz]

...

Concession accepted.

Don't ask dumb rhetorical questions.

Holy shit.
Talk about the pot calling the kettle black.

 

[Deleted member 267581]

The leaders of the Democratic party are not journalists. Other congressionally elected representatives are not mere journalists. Law professors are also not journalists by trade, but I'm not surprised you guys would ignorantly designate those from other primary professions who pen Op-Eds as "journalists". On top of it all, nowhere did @Confucamus state that he was only referring to elected representatives when he mentioned "Democrats". So this was a goalpost you guys invented from the beginning.

Again when you refer to the other side as them you need to be specific on who you’re talking about

Kind of unbelievable that you guys don't have the sense to just take the L, lick your wounds, and limp away without anyone noticing how far down your own throats you stuck your feet. Ironically, I came in here to roll my eyes at Trump. It's such a silly, futile braindropping he floated like he always does.

But it isn't an irrelevant reminder to mention that this tango has been a two-sided dance. Democrats have also made a mockery of political procedure over the past eight years. They forever cheapened impeachment.

Oh right, Benghazi Benghazi Benghazi did we forget ?

Rather than rising above what Republicans did with Garland, they got just as dirty, and excessively politicized SCOTUS approval with their disgraceful character assassination campaigns against Kavanaugh and Coney Barrett.

Ah yes, conservatives pack the court and then you want democrats to rise above it all.

Prominent Democratic intellectuals have proposed dissolving how the Supreme Court works altogether, because they cannot tolerate enduring a generation of conservative judicial majority, and spoiler alert, if Harris wins, we'll be revisiting those ideas. Democrats will find a way to pack the court if they believe they have the votes in the necessary places to do it. In the meantime, they threw a tantrum attempting to introduce the "No Kings Act" to upend Presidential immunity because they refuse to accept the authority of that court. And they routinely assail the 2nd Amendment.

The Democrats have not treated the Constitution or other longstanding cows as sacred. Trump's idea is stupid. That's enough. Pretending he's the only one who tries to inappropriately bend our political institutions to his partisan will is untenable.

What Trump did has no precedent. Stop pretending like democrats were doing something similar.

 

[LangfordBarrow]

Yeah let's just completely ignore why the 25th might've been invoked in the wake of Jan 6th, perfectly reasonable.

If not for partisan allies in the Sentate he would have been impeached for 1/6. It speaks volumes that so many cabinet members rebuked him and Republican Senators voted to impeach him.

 

[djacobox372]

The stupid crap the right comes up with.

Why would the next in line for the presidency be against impeaching a president?

 

[Prefect]

WTF are you talking about?


This was his final speech as president. You can look up basically ANY time Reagan had a microphone and he would absolutely destroy the slobs running in 2024. Or practically any year.

Old people sundown. At Reagan's worse you saw stuff like this where his wife is just telling him what to say.

 

[Prefect]

Do you think Biden is less fit than Trump to hold office?

Trump is a malignant cancer. Biden would have been alright president from the point of view that he wouldn't do a bunch of grifty shit and mostly be carried by his administration. Harris is it now though. Her and Walz are infinitely more competent than Trump and Vance.

 

[Source]

So the idea of invoking the 25th to remove Trump which was originally floated by the AG of the US who was appointed by Trump is now somehow the brainchild of the democrats.

 

[PEB]

 

[BreatheSherBro]

If lying ever became a broadly inpeachable offense, then no one elected in this day and age would be able to complete a term.

 

[ChosenOne]

If not for partisan allies in the Sentate he would have been impeached for 1/6. It speaks volumes that so many cabinet members rebuked him and Republican Senators voted to impeach him.

And Mitch McConnell was calling for the Dems to use the judiciary and jail him for what he did.

Both McConnell and McCarthy condemned Trump, directly for Jan 5th.

The only reason the Republi'cans' did not take out Trump was because they could not imagine the Dem's and DoJ would be so incompetent and feckless in doing it.

The Republi'cans' were desperately hoping the DoJ would take him out for them, so they could condemn it all the way and hope to inherit the Trump magat base. They knew if they took Trump down themselves, they would lose his hard core base and win back the party but not be able to win elections.

If Trump is to win, i think Garland has to get the bulk of blame. He has been a disaster as AG. He should have appointed at least one if not 3 Special Counsels to investigate so many aspects of Trumps criminality, within a month of taking office. Instead he waited until Trump declared and it is only because Trump declared historically early, thinking it would protect him, did Garland finally do it. He had every reasons to do it, from month 1 saying 'investigating the former POTUS requires a arms length approach'.

no one thinks Trumps DoJ, lead by Bill Barr would have been so feckless if that was the situation Trump faced from Obama, trying to stay in for a 3rd term.