Law Trump says the Epstein list is a conspiracy created by Obama and Clinton

Do you believe Trump is in the Epstein List?

  • Yes, absolutely.

    Votes: 259 57.8%
  • Yes, probably.

    Votes: 125 27.9%
  • No, he's not on the list.

    Votes: 28 6.3%
  • No, there is no list. So of course he's not on it.

    Votes: 18 4.0%
  • I'm on the fence.

    Votes: 18 4.0%

  • Total voters
    448
She has sons so it's quite possible she has y chromosomes in her body. It doesn't automatically make her a man.
Quoted for hilarity. According to LangfordBarrow: "She has sons so it's quite possible she has y chromosomes in her body. It doesn't automatically make her a man."
 
Almost anything is better than a felon, rapist corrupt POS we have now.

Do you agree this is the most corrupt administration in US history?
If I can agree that Trump is the most corrupt then I would have to agree that Biden would be better.

But maybe it's Woodrow Wilson who is the most corrupt for giving the Federal Reserve and the Income Tax.

My position is that it is better for Trump to fumble releasing the Epstein files than it is for Biden to continue covering them up with everyone pretending all is well.

My position is: Now that it is clear that there is a uniparty of Epstein's network that controls Trump and Biden (who are both committed to secrecy of Epstein's network), you won't solve anything by voting for Gavin Newsom (Kang) or JD Vance (Kodos).

So I propose a viral write-in campaign to defeat both the Dem and Repub candidates, and you can't propose a better solution; your solution is to vote for Biden and Newsom.
 
The non-released Epstein files of the future are the JFK files of today. The Anung Un Rama of the future will not care that there was no glasnost of the Epstein files, but if the Anung Un Rama of today were a bit more honest, he would admit that he doesn't care about the Epstein files now either, except to cast blame on partisan opponents for their nonrelease.


Democracy and voting are already a thing of the past if they were ever a thing in the first place. The test of the hypothesis of the uniparty is a viral write in campaign for the Nword Heil Hitler (or Boaty McBoatface or Hitler DId Nothing Wrong) candidate. What does it take for you to realize that you are ruled by a uniparty? Not the nonrelease of the Epstein files; you are ruled by the uniparty named in those files.
Well, you can get right back in your time machine and go fight the issue of the 1960s. Godspeed to ya.
Right now, however, we have a rapist in the WH actively protecting child rapists, (some convicted, others not, one probably himself) while simultaneously destroying America.
 
Well, you can get right back in your time machine and go fight the issue of the 1960s. Godspeed to ya.
Right now, however, we have a rapist in the WH actively protecting child rapists, (some convicted, others not, one probably himself) while simultaneously destroying America.
But the Dems have been bravely fighting against the child rapists? It's tiresome.
 
If I can agree that Trump is the most corrupt then I would have to agree that Biden would be better.

But maybe it's Woodrow Wilson who is the most corrupt for giving the Federal Reserve and the Income Tax.

My position is that it is better for Trump to fumble releasing the Epstein files than it is for Biden to continue covering them up with everyone pretending all is well.

My position is: Now that it is clear that there is a uniparty of Epstein's network that controls Trump and Biden (who are both committed to secrecy of Epstein's network), you won't solve anything by voting for Gavin Newsom (Kang) or JD Vance (Kodos).

So I propose a viral write-in campaign to defeat both the Dem and Repub candidates, and you can't propose a better solution; your solution is to vote for Biden and Newsom.
So you are a one issue voter, Epstein transparency?

I worry more about children and the poor. I'm not saying I'm right but the rich will always be getting away with shit and the poor will always be getting the shaft. I'm more worried about the little guy.
 
So you are a one issue voter, Epstein transparency?

I worry more about children and the poor. I'm not saying I'm right but the rich will always be getting away with shit and the poor will always be getting the shaft. I'm more worried about the little guy.
There it is: Secrecy of Epstein's network is only important insofar as it can be blamed on one side (Kang) to flip supporters to the other side (Kodos).

You are ruled by Epstein's network. It is a uniparty of Kang and Kodos. Is this okay with you?
 
There it is: Secrecy of Epstein's network is only important insofar as it can be blamed on one side (Kang) to flip supporters to the other side (Kodos).

You are ruled by Epstein's network. It is a uniparty of Kang and Kodos. Is this okay with you?
Yes our system suck, is perhaps broken beyond repair at this point. It's money that controls the process, not the jews IMHO.
 
Quoted for hilarity. According to LangfordBarrow: "She has sons so it's quite possible she has y chromosomes in her body. It doesn't automatically make her a man."
Have you ever been interested in science? Do you have any idea what microchimerism is? "A man is a man and a woman is a woman." Amirite?
 
There it is: Secrecy of Epstein's network is only important insofar as it can be blamed on one side (Kang) to flip supporters to the other side (Kodos).

You are ruled by Epstein's network. It is a uniparty of Kang and Kodos. Is this okay with you?
You seen to be ruled by diarrhea of the mouth.
 
Yes our system suck, is perhaps broken beyond repair at this point. It's money that controls the process, not the jews IMHO.
Do you remember how Mr Pink knew that Mr Blonde was not the mole because Mr Blonde shot up the bank. This is how you will know that the viral candidate is not uniparty. Can you describe anything more uniparty than Epstein and Netanyahu right now? It is time to test the uniparty system by committing to no Kang, no Kudos. Can you think of a better solution for all disappointed Republicans to write in Nick Fuentes and all disappointed Democrats to write in Whitney Webb? It doesn't have to be those two, but it needs to be a Boaty McBoatface choice that is legally qualified to be president.
 
Last edited:
Have you ever been interested in science? Do you have any idea what microchimerism is? "A man is a man and a woman is a woman." Amirite?
Where does the Y chromosome in the son come from, the mother or the father?
 
That makes no sense. What happens if it’s not “found” by a “loyalist”? And a loyalist to who? Teams of federal and state investigators.
Well you know people regularly to review of all classification of filles right, there are regulations and laws for that. Security officers/ managers, original delegation authority, data miners, inspectors, derivative classification officers and a lot more people who have the clearance and the need to know. Maybe not even a loyalist but could be anyone who wants a guaranteed job for life would destroy it right away, or anyone powerful enough who knows they are guilty would pull strings and intervene. No way there would be some files with names of powerful people waiting to be exposed, this is why Pam looks incompetent. If people actually think about the situation kind of like JFK files, they think they will keep on record "CIA killed JFK" evidence and I'm not claiming that is what happened.

You voted for Trump do you think he engaged in human traffieting sexual acts on Epstein's island ? I don't I also don't really think Bill Clinton did either, these guys are alpha rich types that could pull women, now your bill gate and steven hawkings are suspect. But if real evidence shows Trump did, he should rot in jail until he dies and anyone involved in the cover ups. This CT is a pseudo–Occam’s Razor to people and their own egos,(most emotionally satisfying).
 
Never forget Trump fired Maureen Comey, who helped put Maxwell away.
I can't imagine why Pam fired James Comey's daughter..


who failed to get any clients of Maxwell

failed with P diddy..

could of ran interference behalf of her dad and his powerful friends ..

 
for everyone except the retarded this is a both sides issue, how can you say your side doesn't have blood on its hands when it could have released the files at any time
It’s not that “our side” is innocent. The difference is that when you guys say “but Bill” we say “yeah if there’s evidence then take him down.” Meanwhile, you MAGA diehards are defending and denying the truth about the King of kid diddlers.

Like at this point it’s super obvious he was a platinum member of the Epstein party club and you want to pretend it’s all smoke and mirrors by the evil dems. Yeah it’s all the dems doing. Just keep ignoring all the contradictory statements Trump has given. That’s all the Dems doing too right?
 
Last edited:
Just look it up. It's called microchimerism.
Is something you came up with yourself, or has one of Brigitte's lawyers actually suggested that her XX vs XY sexual genotype is unknowable because of microchimerism (For those of you who don't want to look it up: These would be cells with Y-chromosomes from her son that she got contaminated with when she purportedly carried him as a fetus, not her own cells she was born with)?

How about we just swab her mouth and look for Barr bodies (Some of us literally did this in high school)? Could microchimerism replace Brigitte's entire oral mucosa?
 
Last edited:
Back
Top