Social Trump says he "can't work with democrats"

...so now i'm supposed to prove a negative? umm... learn logic, please.



really? does mueller know about this? maybe you should tell him, since you know more about his own investigation...

It's in his report dummy. Volume 1. Read it.


ahh, yes. the "hacks."

1. this ain't collusion.
2. the main leak was local/internal
3. the only "hack" there was podesta's personal email account (which wasn't even really a hack and just a basic phishing)



says the one who cited 0 collusion.

You're too dumb, I'm wasting my time.
 
...so now i'm supposed to prove a negative? umm... learn logic, please.



really? does mueller know about this? maybe you should tell him, since you know more about his own investigation...




ahh, yes. the "hacks."

1. this ain't collusion.
2. the main leak was local/internal
3. the only "hack" there was podesta's personal email account (which wasn't even really a hack and just a basic phishing)



says the one who cited 0 collusion.

Have you read any of the report? I seriously have doubts if you're going to say Podesta's email was the only hacking going on.

What, in your view, is what happened in our election from the Russians?
 
It's in his report dummy. Volume 1. Read it.




You're too dumb, I'm wasting my time.


so you can't back up your own claim that you insist upon (despite being the literal opposite of what mueller said) and cite jack and shit to support your claim... yet you expect me to prove a negative (no collusion)?

A+ LOGIC
 
Have you read any of the report? I seriously have doubts if you're going to say Podesta's email was the only hacking going on.

What, in your view, is what happened in our election from the Russians?

the main wikileaks "hack" didn't appear to be a hack at all and appeared to be a leak.

as for "russians," it seemed to be mostly cambridge analytical/facebook selling people's data and just a lot of dumb social media bullshit. and it had nothing to do with collusion - it's not like any of that happened by request of trump.
 
as for "russians," it seemed to be mostly cambridge analytical/facebook selling people's data and just a lot of dumb social media bullshit. and it had nothing to do with collusion - it's not like any of that happened by request of trump.



And the (Russian) hacking started immediately after.
 
the main wikileaks "hack" didn't appear to be a hack at all and appeared to be a leak.

as for "russians," it seemed to be mostly cambridge analytical/facebook selling people's data and just a lot of dumb social media bullshit. and it had nothing to do with collusion - it's not like any of that happened by request of trump.

So, no, you haven't read anything in the report detailing Russia's systematic attack on the US election.
 


And the (Russian) hacking started immediately after.


finding missing emails from hillary's email server circa year(s) prior =/= hacking podesta

So, no, you haven't read anything in the report detailing Russia's systematic attack on the US election.

i literally just referenced that. or do you believe the "systematic attack" was something much more grander than social media garbage/phishing podesta? if so, enlighten. hint: you won't. because that's all it was.
 
Looks like the lil orange snowflake isn't a dealmaker after all. Fail!
 
finding missing emails from hillary's email server circa year(s) prior =/= hacking podesta



i literally just referenced that. or do you believe the "systematic attack" was something much more grander than social media garbage/phishing podesta? if so, enlighten. hint: you won't. because that's all it was.

Here is the report. I won't read for you, but it's searchable, and exceedingly easy to read the table of contents and go forth from there.
https://www.cnn.com/2019/04/18/politics/full-mueller-report-pdf/index.html
 
https://www.justice.gov/storage/report.pdf

Second, while the investigation identified numerous links between individuals with ties to the Russian government and individuals associated with the Trump Campaign, the evidence was not sufficient to support criminal charges. Among other things, the evidence was not sufficient to charge any Campaign official as an unregistered agent of the Russian government or other Russian principal. And our evidence about the June 9, 2016 meeting and WikiLeaks' s releases of hacked materials was not sufficient to charge a criminal campaign-finance violation. Further, the evidence was not sufficient to charge that any member of the Trump Campaign conspired with representatives of the Russian government to interfere in the 2016 election.

oops, no collusion.

as for 'mah russian interference!'

U.S. Department of Justice Atterrte~· Werk Predttet // May Cetttairt Material Preteetee Urteer Fee. R. Crim. P. 6(e) EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TO VOLUME I RUSSIAN SOCIAL MEDIA CAMPAIGN The Internet Research Agency (IRA) carried out the earliest Russian interference operations identified by the investigation-a social media campaign designed to provoke and amplify political and social discord in the United States

In March 2016, the GRU began hacking the email accounts of Clinton Campaign volunteers and employees, including campaign chairman John Podesta. In April 2016, the GRU hacked into the computer networks of the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee (DCCC) and the Democratic National Committee (DNC). The GRU stole hundreds of thousands of documents from the compromised email accounts and networks. Around the time that the DNC announced in mid-June 2016 the Russian government's role in hacking its network, the GRU began disseminating stolen materials through the fictitious online personas " DCLeaks" and "Guccifer 2.0." The GRU later released additional materials through the organization WikiLeaks.

social media campaign
podesta phished
dnc leak (report calls it hack, but forensics generally disagree)

wow, it's like i just said all this, or something.

oh, right. i did!

i literally just referenced that. or do you believe the "systematic attack" was something much more grander than social media garbage/phishing podesta? if so, enlighten. hint: you won't. because that's all it was.


edit: since this was (predictably) evaded, @hillelslovak87 @kpt018
 
Last edited:
The presidents meeting with Pelosi and Schumer this morning lasted five minutes before Donny had a meltdown and left to whine to the press. He went full defensive mode and said "he can't work with democrats" because of "phony investigations".

Crazy, our president literally refusing to work with lawmakers from the other side. Literally one of his main responsibilities. There's no way we can get anything done when the president refuses to try.

All this because he is being so defensive and butt hurt about legitimate investigations into his organization. Certainly makes him seem very guilty. If he was innocent why would he care?

Also why does he see it as so strange that he's being investigated. Multiple ex members of his inner circle literally testified under oath that the President is committing a miriad off financial crimes. Of course that warrants an investigation.

We've officially entered the twilight zone. To think America voted for this guy.


https://www-m.cnn.com/2019/05/22/politics/donald-trump-democrats-mueller-russia-feud/index.html
How do you work with people afflicted by TDS?
 
a lot of people got arrested, so are those arrests phony as well?

basically. ffs, roger stone was SWAT'd and arrested because he knew that wikileaks had the dnc files. which... everyone else on the internet also knew.

manafort and gates were arrested for shit that was prior to this, so...

0 arrests for collusion.
 
The presidents meeting with Pelosi and Schumer this morning lasted five minutes before Donny had a meltdown and left to whine to the press. He went full defensive mode and said "he can't work with democrats" because of "phony investigations".

Crazy, our president literally refusing to work with lawmakers from the other side. Literally one of his main responsibilities. There's no way we can get anything done when the president refuses to try.

All this because he is being so defensive and butt hurt about legitimate investigations into his organization. Certainly makes him seem very guilty. If he was innocent why would he care?

Also why does he see it as so strange that he's being investigated. Multiple ex members of his inner circle literally testified under oath that the President is committing a miriad off financial crimes. Of course that warrants an investigation.

We've officially entered the twilight zone. To think America voted for this guy.


https://www-m.cnn.com/2019/05/22/politics/donald-trump-democrats-mueller-russia-feud/index.html
Work with people that are accusing you of criminal activity? Where is the evidence to even talk this way? Also, where the fuck is Pelosi, Shumar, K. Harris, Waters Tax returns for the last 10 years?
 
Work with people that are accusing you of criminal activity? Where is the evidence to even talk this way? Also, where the fuck is Pelosi, Shumar, K. Harris, Waters Tax returns for the last 10 years?
Kamala Harris released hers, as have all of the leading democratic front runners for president. Pelosi isn't running for president. Id think it's quite obvious why he is being investigated? Multiple members of his circle have alleged crimes... I haven't heard that against these other politicians
 
He's obviously panicking as the courts slap him around. I just hope that I'm wrong about what he's capable of.
 
Back
Top