- Joined
- Aug 18, 2009
- Messages
- 48,248
- Reaction score
- 23,312
I can agree with this.
I believe I started drifting away from what was being brought up in the op into other things.
Trump did not have the right to encourage his people to attack people for just interfering with his speach if that is what he was implying.
Agreed. I think they're raising other, better, arguments that are more legally sound, the trespass argument for example. But that other argument, that doesn't fly.