• Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version.

Trump: Other nations extort drug-makers

Neph

Brown Belt
@Brown
Joined
Aug 10, 2006
Messages
3,621
Reaction score
2,515
Trump: Other nations extort drug-makers

_101304150_gettyimages-957425146.jpg

Donald Trump says he wants to eliminate the "middlemen" in America's pharmaceutical pricing system

US President Donald Trump has accused foreign governments of extorting "unreasonably low prices" from pharmaceutical firms.

Speaking in Washington on Friday, he said he had directed his top trade negotiator to make the issue a priority in trade talks.

"It is time to end the global freeloading once and for all," he said.

The president is under pressure to deliver on campaign promises to reduce the high costs of prescription drugs.

In his speech, the president pinned the problem in part on price controls in other countries that he said "extort unreasonably low prices" from drug-makers, forcing Americans to pay more to "subsidise the enormous costs of research and development".

"That is unacceptable," he said.

However, experts say foreign pricing is not a major influence on US costs and changing it will not help Americans.

Paul Ginsburg, a professor of health policy at USC and the director of the USC-Brookings Schaeffer Initiative for Health Policy, said firms set prices to maximise profits and already have ample incentives to innovate.

"The notion that if other countries pay more for drugs that US consumers will pay less, that's just not true," said

"If they are able to get other countries to pay more, I don't believe it will have any effect on prices in the United States," he added. "It will only raise drug company profits."

Shares of health care companies jumped after the president's speech.


Higher costs

Polls repeatedly find that reducing the high cost of prescription drugs is a priority for American voters.

The US spent $1,443 per capita on pharmaceutical costs in 2016, compared to a range of $466 to $939 in 10 other high income countries, including the UK, Australia, Canada and Japan, according to a study in the Journal of the American Medical Association.

The report said those costs were one of the primary drivers of overall US health spending, which was nearly twice as high as in the other countries.

President Donald Trump seized on the issue during his 2016 election campaign.

At the time, he said the government should negotiate drug prices for government health programmes, such as Medicare. He also voiced support for allowing people to buy medicines from countries where they cost less, such as Canada.

Neither of those proposals was mentioned in Friday's speech.

Senator Chuck Schumer, Democrat from New York, said the president's blueprint offered "little more than window dressing".

"The idea that asking Germany to charge their citizens more for drugs will help Americans is a cop-out and the height of absurdity that nobody believes," he said.


Details of the plan
US drug prices are set by companies and subsequently renegotiated with insurers, suppliers and hospitals through rebates, discounts and other measures.

President Trump said he wants to eliminate "the middlemen" in that system.

The White House blueprint calls for requiring disclosure of out-of-pocket costs and for ending rules that limit what pharmacists can share about costs, among other measures.

President Trump also said he is considering requiring firms to identify drug costs in advertisements.

The plans also emphasises increasing competition among drug manufacturers, by speeding up approvals for generic drugs and cracking down on the "gaming" of intellectual property patents.

Some of those measures are already under way. US Health and Human Services Secretary Alex Azar on Friday warned "it will take time" for the system to change.

Gerard Anderson, a professor of health policy at Johns Hopkins University, said he is sceptical the proposals will reduce health care costs overall and it is too early to gauge the political effect.

"I don't know how the American public is going to respond," Mr Anderson said. "It clearly does not meet what President Trump said he was going to do when he was elected."

He also said it is unlikely that countries will be cowed by administration demands about pharmaceuticals.

"I don't expect that any country is going to say, 'Oh, we're going to increase our prices because President Trump wants it'," he said.

 
Nice deflection Teflon Don, the Art of the Deal isn't working so you lash out. Maybe if the health care industry wasn't beholden to (or directly in bed with) the pharmaceutical industry it would be a different story.

In the meanwhile the message I'll send from at least one of the countries you are speaking to:

Nahhhh fuck off.
 
Yes, I am sure that if the greedy pharma companies got more money from foreign nations, they wouldn't have even higher profits, they would give it back to Americans.

Here is your sign Trump.
 
So his idea of a solution to pharmaceuticals in this country is to:

1. Raise foreign prices
2. Magically result in lower US prices
3. Ignore the epidemic of over-prescribing
4. ??????
5. Profit



We're in good hands folks. And by we I mean shareholders and other rich sacks of shit. The commoners can go fuck off and die- but not before they each spend tens of thousands in legal drugs giving themselves infinitely more problems than they started with and potentially becoming deadly addicted to opioids.
 
Last edited:
Another campaign promise broken, wonder how much money got from the drug companies?
 
c5e.jpg


This is quickly becoming a Modern Conservatives meme
 
Incoherent rambling.
Incoherent rambling
Who? Not our president...

Look, having nuclear—my uncle was a great professor and scientist and engineer, Dr. John Trump at MIT; good genes, very good genes, OK, very smart, the Wharton School of Finance, very good, very smart—you know, if you’re a conservative Republican, if I were a liberal, if, like, OK, if I ran as a liberal Democrat, they would say I'm one of the smartest people anywhere in the world—it’s true!—but when you're a conservative Republican they try—oh, do they do a number—that’s why I always start off: Went to Wharton, was a good student, went there, went there, did this, built a fortune—you know I have to give my like credentials all the time, because we’re a little disadvantaged—but you look at the nuclear deal, the thing that really bothers me—it would have been so easy, and it’s not as important as these lives are (nuclear is powerful; my uncle explained that to me many, many years ago, the power and that was 35 years ago; he would explain the power of what's going to happen and he was right—who would have thought?), but when you look at what's going on with the four prisoners—now it used to be three, now it’s four—but when it was three and even now, I would have said it's all in the messenger; fellas, and it is fellas because, you know, they don't, they haven’t figured that the women are smarter right now than the men, so, you know, it’s gonna take them about another 150 years—but the Persians are great negotiators, the Iranians are great negotiators, so, and they, they just killed, they just killed us.

Okay...maybe our president
 
Surprised he did not go to his old stand bys and blame Muslims, Mexicans or Hillary for our high drug costs.
His speech was a hodge podge of bullshit.
 
So other countries are better at negotiating reasonable prices from those scumbags in the pharmaceutical industry than America? I thought Trump liked to style himself as the greatest negotiator in the world. Negotiate a better deal for Americans you tool.
 
if drug companies could not make a profit in other countries they would not sell in those nations so I don't buy this
 
Trump: Other nations extort drug-makers

_101304150_gettyimages-957425146.jpg

Donald Trump says he wants to eliminate the "middlemen" in America's pharmaceutical pricing system

US President Donald Trump has accused foreign governments of extorting "unreasonably low prices" from pharmaceutical firms.

Speaking in Washington on Friday, he said he had directed his top trade negotiator to make the issue a priority in trade talks.

"It is time to end the global freeloading once and for all," he said.

The president is under pressure to deliver on campaign promises to reduce the high costs of prescription drugs.

In his speech, the president pinned the problem in part on price controls in other countries that he said "extort unreasonably low prices" from drug-makers, forcing Americans to pay more to "subsidise the enormous costs of research and development".

"That is unacceptable," he said.

However, experts say foreign pricing is not a major influence on US costs and changing it will not help Americans.

Paul Ginsburg, a professor of health policy at USC and the director of the USC-Brookings Schaeffer Initiative for Health Policy, said firms set prices to maximise profits and already have ample incentives to innovate.

"The notion that if other countries pay more for drugs that US consumers will pay less, that's just not true," said

"If they are able to get other countries to pay more, I don't believe it will have any effect on prices in the United States," he added. "It will only raise drug company profits."

Shares of health care companies jumped after the president's speech.


Higher costs

Polls repeatedly find that reducing the high cost of prescription drugs is a priority for American voters.

The US spent $1,443 per capita on pharmaceutical costs in 2016, compared to a range of $466 to $939 in 10 other high income countries, including the UK, Australia, Canada and Japan, according to a study in the Journal of the American Medical Association.

The report said those costs were one of the primary drivers of overall US health spending, which was nearly twice as high as in the other countries.

President Donald Trump seized on the issue during his 2016 election campaign.

At the time, he said the government should negotiate drug prices for government health programmes, such as Medicare. He also voiced support for allowing people to buy medicines from countries where they cost less, such as Canada.

Neither of those proposals was mentioned in Friday's speech.

Senator Chuck Schumer, Democrat from New York, said the president's blueprint offered "little more than window dressing".

"The idea that asking Germany to charge their citizens more for drugs will help Americans is a cop-out and the height of absurdity that nobody believes," he said.


Details of the plan
US drug prices are set by companies and subsequently renegotiated with insurers, suppliers and hospitals through rebates, discounts and other measures.

President Trump said he wants to eliminate "the middlemen" in that system.

The White House blueprint calls for requiring disclosure of out-of-pocket costs and for ending rules that limit what pharmacists can share about costs, among other measures.

President Trump also said he is considering requiring firms to identify drug costs in advertisements.

The plans also emphasises increasing competition among drug manufacturers, by speeding up approvals for generic drugs and cracking down on the "gaming" of intellectual property patents.

Some of those measures are already under way. US Health and Human Services Secretary Alex Azar on Friday warned "it will take time" for the system to change.

Gerard Anderson, a professor of health policy at Johns Hopkins University, said he is sceptical the proposals will reduce health care costs overall and it is too early to gauge the political effect.

"I don't know how the American public is going to respond," Mr Anderson said. "It clearly does not meet what President Trump said he was going to do when he was elected."

He also said it is unlikely that countries will be cowed by administration demands about pharmaceuticals.

"I don't expect that any country is going to say, 'Oh, we're going to increase our prices because President Trump wants it'," he said.
Jesus fucking tap dancing Christ with this guy.
 
If Trump tried to post that speech on the sherdog he'd be sent to The Dump!
 
Who? Not our president...



Okay...maybe our president
We came in with the Internet. We came up with the Internet. And I think Secretary Clinton and myself would agree very much, when you look at what ISIS is doing with the Internet, they’re beating us at our own game. ISIS.

So we had to get very, very tough on cyber and cyber warfare. It is a huge problem. I have a son—he’s 10 years old. He has computers. He is so good with these computers. It’s unbelievable. The security aspect of cyber is very, very tough. And maybe, it's hardly doable. But I will say, we are not doing the job we should be doing. But that’s true throughout our whole governmental society. We have so many things that we have to do better, Lester. And certainly cyber is one of them.
 
Lol promised to lower unreasonably-inflated drug prices in America, now trying to unreasonably inflate drug prices everywhere.

Bought and paid for.
 
Jesus fucking tap dancing Christ with this guy.
All of the Jesus verbs, just all of them, just fucking all of them.

He's going to lower drug prices by raising drug prices. It's so crazy it just might derp.
 
Back
Top