International Trump is Truly a Putin Cuck - Russia and Trump Says Ukraine Must Elect a New President as Part of a Peace Deal

[brothir]

It doesn't matter that Russia's actions makes them want to join NATO; it's still a concern for Russia.

Which means nothing, because Putin still doesn't have a right to conquer whatever he wants. And now that more countries have joined NATO, his ability to do so has been diminished anyway. He's shot himself in the foot, so him bleeding is definitely a concern. It's just that it's no one's fault but his own. Accountability, right?

 

[The XL]

So?

Our politicians represent our modern constituency, not our past constituency or Ukraine.

 

[aitkenmike]

Cry more, loser.

You are trying to claim the UK is not a democracy. That is as moronic as the dumbasses that say US isn't a democracy, it's a republic.

 

[The XL]

If you look at agreements like that, and then down the line want to negotiate a deal with e.g. Iran, how do you think taking the position that your word is meaningless helps your negotiating position?

Making excessively long agreements is anti-democratic. The people have a right to go in a different direction if they so choose. Our politicians are supposed to represent the will of the people.

 

[Rational Poster]

Making excessively long agreements is anti-democratic. The people have a right to go in a different direction if they so choose. Our politicians are supposed to represent the will of the people.

This is what your brain leaking out of your skull looks like.

 

[nostradumbass]

You are trying to claim the UK is not a democracy. That is as moronic as the dumbasses that say US isn't a democracy, it's a republic.

It isn't, and the UK is even less of one than that. Oh please tell me you're from the UK and thought even the people in your elected positions give a flying fuck what you think. Just pathetic.

 

[aitkenmike]

They did have an election during WW2, and it wasn't to replace the king.

If you are talking about 1945 (5 years after the election was actually due) what was the risk of polling places where people gather being bombed at that point of the war? How many enemy troops were occupying areas of the UK?

 

[Crazy Source]

Our politicians represent our modern constituency, not our past constituency or Ukraine.

Nobody is still around from when the Constitution was signed. Shall we scrap that as well? It's a retarded argument, bud.

 

[sickc0d3r]

Our politicians represent our modern constituency, not our past constituency or Ukraine.

So, just to hone in on the central theme here… you’re saying nothing we’ve decided in the past matters unless the “modern constituency” agrees with it?

 

[The XL]

This is what your brain leaking out of your skull looks like.

That's what it would look like to a buffoon like you.

 

[The XL]

So, just to hone in on the central theme here… you’re saying nothing we’ve decided in the past matters unless the “modern constituency” agrees with it?

Absolutely. Why should the people be dragged into an affair they want no part of, by people they didn't vote for?

 

[aitkenmike]

Making excessively long agreements is anti-democratic. The people have a right to go in a different direction if they so choose. Our politicians are supposed to represent the will of the people.

Cool. Hope the previous owner of your house comes back and takes your home because they feel like they want to go in a different direction now.

 

[The XL]

Nobody was around when the Constitution was signed. Shall we scrap that as well? It's a retarded argument, bud.

The Constitution was signed for the benefit of the people of the United States. This agreement was signed for the benefit of Ukraine.

 

[aitkenmike]

It isn't, and the UK is even less of one than that. Oh please tell me you're from the UK and thought even the people in your elected positions give a flying fuck what you think. Just pathetic.

Nope, not from the UK, just not a moron (most of the time).

 

[ChosenOne]

Um, because Britain wasn't a democracy in the first place. They had a goddamn king ffs and have one right now. How many votes did King Charles get and who did he run against?

This is very hard to say and even more so to believe but this post is breathtakingly stupid even for you.

 

[brothir]

So, just to hone in on the central theme here… you’re saying nothing we’ve decided in the past matters unless the “modern constituency” agrees with it?

The US donating old materiel to help a nation not be genocided is apparently cause for remaking any aspect of democratic structure. OK.

 

[kflo]

They did have an election during WW2, and it wasn't to replace the king.

they were no longer being bombed. their people were safe. you're just trying to save face on an anonymous message board.

and keep pretending GB was a dictatorship...........because they had a "king". you're aware they have a PM, right?

 

[brothir]

This is very hard to say and even more so to believe but this post is breathtakingly stupid even for you.

Are we approaching the beginning of stupidity, or the end? Is it a circle? How exciting.

 

[brothir]

they were no longer being bombed. their people were safe. you're just trying to save face on an anonymous message board.

and keep pretending GB was a dictatorship...........because they had a "king". you're aware they have a PM, right?

Britain is not a republic, but is a democracy of the kind of (parliamentary) constitutional monarchy. Apparently this is hard to fathom for some.

 

[The XL]

Cool. Hope the previous owner of your house comes back and takes your home because they feel like they want to go in a different direction now.

That line of logic doesn't make sense. They signed up for that when they sold their house.