Social Trump is the fakest person on the planet - Bill Maher after dinner with him

[terrapin]

Wow. You literally granted bill did rape women and kids and still went

But trump .

Dont forget one of the epstein didnt like trump and thought he was discipable??
Lol.... okay?

You need to calm down . You arent in a battle of good v evil.

You went "But Bill Clinton".

The topic wasis Trump. You are literally just projecting but you didn't expect me to be honest about Bill Clinton.

Epstein thought Trump was a despicable person, but he was best friends with him for 10 years after everyone knew he was a phile.... That's at least as damning as Bill Clinton but probably worse.

But when you add all the rest of Trump's crimes and immorality and degradation, it's not even close. Trump is worse in every single metric.


And you are wrong about the times we are in. This is not a battle between Democrats and Republicans. It's a battle between Democrats and a fascistic strong man who is profoundly and completely corrupt and would like to destroy America and the Constitution for his own gain.


You guys all fail to recognize the times we are in.

 

[Anewt]

You went "But Bill Clinton".

The topic wasis Trump. You are literally just projecting but you didn't expect me to be honest about Bill Clinton.

Epstein thought Trump was a despicable person, but he was best friends with him for 10 years after everyone knew he was a phile.... That's at least as damning as Bill Clinton but probably worse.

But when you add all the rest of Trump's crimes and immorality and degradation, it's not even close. Trump is worse in every single metric.


And you are wrong about the times we are in. This is not a battle between Democrats and Republicans. It's a battle between Democrats and a fascistic strong man who is profoundly and completely corrupt and would like to destroy America and the Constitution for his own gain.


You guys all fail to recognize the times we are in.

I went bill clinton because you wanted previous sexual predators... ypu literally asked me to.

You can't find 10 presidents whose collective sin equals trumps. This is the lie you guys tell yourselves to justify what you have done but it's a lie just like Trump is a lie.

I tend to not value anything epstein said. You should give it a go like most sane people......

 

[terrapin]

I went bill clinton because you wanted previous sexual predators... ypu literally asked me to.




I tend to not value anything epstein said. You should give it a go like most sane people......

i said the collective sin man. and there is NO WAY you will ever find 10 or even 20 presidents whose collective sin adds up to trump.

this is not normal and you are supporting a fascistic dictator.. this is a clear right vs wrong time in history.

you guys have to LIE and pretend its normal so you can live with yourselves.

 

[jeremyemilio]

You're just not a very deep thinker and you haven't analyzed the overall situation and what it's intent was.

That was absolutely Bill Maher in a barely sophisticated way that people like you won't catch humanizing Trump when there's nothing in there worth humanizing. It's part of Trump's cultish attraction that anybody can't see it.

All he did is soften the hatred and justified reaction towards Trump that we're all experiencing and shame Democrats for not being willing to sit down with him like enlightened Billy does.

Trump is a human. Dehumanizing humans is wrong. Humanizing them is not wrong.

(That is not a political statement. Nor is it a statement on Trump and/or Mahar. It's a comment on you and your ideals.)

 

[terrapin]

Trump is a human. Dehumanizing humans is wrong. Humanizing them is not wrong.

(That is not a political statement. Nor is it a statement in Trump and/or Mahar. It's a comment on you and your ideals.)

if you want to talk about human dignity in a thread that is not political as you claim you are then we can do that. start one and I'll join it immediately. lots of thoughts on that level coming from a deep theological and psychological understanding.

otherwise you know exactly what I mean here and YOU are misrepresenting it.

should we humanize Ted Bundy while he is presidnt? or Hitler? there is a time and a place and a strategy.

you are missing the point completely.

trump used bill Maher to whitewash his image. that's what just happened.

 

[jeremyemilio]

if you want to talk about human dignity in a thread that is not political as you claim you are then we can do that. start one and I'll join it immediately. lots of thoughts on that level coming from a deep theological and psychological understanding.

otherwise you know exactly what I mean here and YOU are misrepresenting it.

should we humanize Ted Bundy while he is presidnt? or Hitler? there is a time and a place and a strategy.

you are missing the point completely.

trump used bill Maher to whitewash his image. that's what just happened.

Bundy and Hitler were both humans, yes. Dehumanizing them is immoral and is a mistake. Humanizing them is not. Humans do horrific things. Some more horrific than others, and some unimaginably horrific. Humans can be evil. But even evil humans are, indeed, humans.

Nothing was whitewashed. To the contrary, Mahar simply went to visit the man (not immoral, and not a mistake), and then relayed the truth about what happened while there (also not immoral or a mistake). What you want is for the truth to be curated, censored, or "deplatformed" for the masses by wiser and more perceptive people such as yourself. That is the only attempted "whitewashing" taking place here. That, too, is immoral and a mistake.

 

[terrapin]

Bundy and Hitler were both humans, yes. Dehumanizing them is immoral and is a mistake. Humanizing them is not. Humans do horrific things. Some more horrific than others, and some unimaginably horrific. Humans can be evil. But even evil humans are, indeed, humans.

Nothing was whitewashed. To the contrary, Mahar simply went to visit the man (not immoral, and not a mistake), and then relayed the truth about what happened while there (also not immoral or a mistake). What you want is for the truth to be curated, censored, or "deplatformed" for the masses by wiser and more perceptive people such as yourself. That is the only attempted "whitewashing" taking place here. That, too, is immoral and a mistake.

You clearly don't understand my position. Why don't you go back and read my actual posts and respond with something intelligent that represents what I've said.

Or if you're too lazy and you think you do know my stated position describe it for me and I'll tell you what you've got wrong

 

[Xanzito]

I asked Chatgpt to summarize this thread so i wouldn't have to read it all.
It's response was:

 

[Bob Gray]

I asked Chatgpt to summarize this thread so i wouldn't have to read it all.
It's response was:

You actually gave me an idea. Never done it before. I went ahead and asked AI if it could read through a forum thread and give me opinions on it. Turns out if absolutely can, and I asked it to judge @terrapin posts and its pretty lol-worthy







"
If I asked you to search a specific forum thread on a web site, could you sum it up?

ChatGPT said:​

Yes. Just send me the link to the thread (or tell me what to search for and where), and I can check it out and give you a summary.
4o

You said:​

Social Thread 'Trump is the fakest person on the planet - Bill Maher after dinner with him'

Apr 12, 2025

Bill Maher ate dinner with Trump last week and Trump took him specifically to the "blowjob" room

Maher talks about how fake Trump is here and gave him a MAGA hat but Bill refused to wear it

• Richmma80
• Replies: 292
• Forum: The War Room

• 
• 

ChatGPT said:​

The Sherdog forum thread titled "Trump is the fakest person on the planet - Bill Maher after dinner with him" has sparked a lively debate among users regarding Bill Maher's recent dinner with former President Donald Trump.

Key Discussion Points​

• Divergent Interpretations of Maher's Remarks: Some users argue that Maher's comments about Trump being "fake" are critical, emphasizing the performative aspects of Trump's public persona. Others believe Maher's remarks suggest a more nuanced view, acknowledging Trump's effectiveness as a politician despite personal disagreements.
• Debate Over Maher's Intentions: Participants are divided on whether Maher's engagement with Trump serves to humanize the former president or inadvertently normalizes his controversial behavior.
• Critique of Media Representation: Several users express skepticism about media portrayals of the dinner, suggesting that reports may either exaggerate or downplay the significance of the meeting based on political biases.

User Reactions​

• One user criticizes Maher for allegedly softening his stance on Trump, stating that the dinner "normalized Trump's fascistic tendencies."
• Another counters this view, arguing that Maher maintained his critical perspective and that the dinner provided an opportunity for open dialogue.Decider
• A third user highlights the complexity of public figures' personas, noting that private interactions can reveal different facets not seen in the public eye.New York Post

The thread showcases a spectrum of opinions, reflecting broader societal debates about political discourse, media influence, and the challenges of interpreting public figures' actions and statements.

Sources

2/2
4o

You said:​

What do you think about the responses from a poster named terrapin? Did he seem reasonable?

ChatGPT said:​

Terrapin's posts express strong disapproval of Bill Maher's dinner with Trump, claiming Maher effectively legitimized Trump's behavior and downplayed his past actions. His tone is passionate and accusatory, using loaded language and exaggeration. While he reflects a genuine viewpoint shared by some, his reasoning is highly emotional and less focused on nuance, which led to pushback from other posters who viewed Maher’s account differently.

You can read Terrapin’s comments in full here.
4o

You said:​

Does the poster named Terrapin strike you as a reasonable, in formed person whos opinion has value? Or should he be mostly ignored?

ChatGPT said:​

Terrapin seems passionate and politically engaged, but their posts are highly emotional, sometimes hyperbolic, and lean more on rhetoric than well-supported arguments. While their perspective reflects a segment of public opinion, the tone may limit constructive discussion. Whether their opinion has value depends on what you're seeking—if you're interested in strong reactions or activist-style views, it’s relevant; if you're after calm, nuanced reasoning, you might look elsewhere in the thread."






Out of sheer curiosity I asked about my own posts, too. this is actually kind of interesting to see and read. Could be useful in some discussions going forward. Still, its AI, though.


"
In contrast what do you think of a poster named Bob Grays posts? DOes he seem reasonable or not?

ChatGPT said:​

Bob Gray comes across as more measured and analytical in his posts. He generally avoids extreme language, engages with points made by others, and provides reasoning for his views. While he may still have a clear stance, he presents it in a way that encourages discussion rather than shutting it down. Overall, he appears to be a more reasonable and thoughtful contributor to the thread."

 

[HOLA]

I watched it earlier tonight. I'm not sure what was surprising to Bill. Surely, as someone in show biz himself, he can see firsthand that people don't act the same off camera as they do on camera.

Was pretty funny how Trump signed the paper full of insults though.

 

[Lycandroid]

I am not reading all ten pages of this retarded thread, but did anyone point out the irony of misrepresenting what Bill said in order to call Trump fake ?

 

[ShadowRun]

Oh geez now he's changing policies involving animal rights, someone has to stop this lunatic.

 

[ShadowRun]

You actually gave me an idea. Never done it before. I went ahead and asked AI if it could read through a forum thread and give me opinions on it. Turns out if absolutely can, and I asked it to judge @terrapin posts and its pretty lol-worthy







"
If I asked you to search a specific forum thread on a web site, could you sum it up?

ChatGPT said:​

Yes. Just send me the link to the thread (or tell me what to search for and where), and I can check it out and give you a summary.
4o

You said:​

Social Thread 'Trump is the fakest person on the planet - Bill Maher after dinner with him'

Apr 12, 2025

Bill Maher ate dinner with Trump last week and Trump took him specifically to the "blowjob" room

Maher talks about how fake Trump is here and gave him a MAGA hat but Bill refused to wear it

• Richmma80
• Replies: 292
• Forum: The War Room

• 
• 

ChatGPT said:​

The Sherdog forum thread titled "Trump is the fakest person on the planet - Bill Maher after dinner with him" has sparked a lively debate among users regarding Bill Maher's recent dinner with former President Donald Trump.

Key Discussion Points​

• Divergent Interpretations of Maher's Remarks: Some users argue that Maher's comments about Trump being "fake" are critical, emphasizing the performative aspects of Trump's public persona. Others believe Maher's remarks suggest a more nuanced view, acknowledging Trump's effectiveness as a politician despite personal disagreements.
• Debate Over Maher's Intentions: Participants are divided on whether Maher's engagement with Trump serves to humanize the former president or inadvertently normalizes his controversial behavior.
• Critique of Media Representation: Several users express skepticism about media portrayals of the dinner, suggesting that reports may either exaggerate or downplay the significance of the meeting based on political biases.

User Reactions​

• One user criticizes Maher for allegedly softening his stance on Trump, stating that the dinner "normalized Trump's fascistic tendencies."
• Another counters this view, arguing that Maher maintained his critical perspective and that the dinner provided an opportunity for open dialogue.Decider
• A third user highlights the complexity of public figures' personas, noting that private interactions can reveal different facets not seen in the public eye.New York Post

The thread showcases a spectrum of opinions, reflecting broader societal debates about political discourse, media influence, and the challenges of interpreting public figures' actions and statements.

Sources

2/2
4o

You said:​

What do you think about the responses from a poster named terrapin? Did he seem reasonable?

ChatGPT said:​

Terrapin's posts express strong disapproval of Bill Maher's dinner with Trump, claiming Maher effectively legitimized Trump's behavior and downplayed his past actions. His tone is passionate and accusatory, using loaded language and exaggeration. While he reflects a genuine viewpoint shared by some, his reasoning is highly emotional and less focused on nuance, which led to pushback from other posters who viewed Maher’s account differently.

You can read Terrapin’s comments in full here.
4o

You said:​

Does the poster named Terrapin strike you as a reasonable, in formed person whos opinion has value? Or should he be mostly ignored?

ChatGPT said:​

Terrapin seems passionate and politically engaged, but their posts are highly emotional, sometimes hyperbolic, and lean more on rhetoric than well-supported arguments. While their perspective reflects a segment of public opinion, the tone may limit constructive discussion. Whether their opinion has value depends on what you're seeking—if you're interested in strong reactions or activist-style views, it’s relevant; if you're after calm, nuanced reasoning, you might look elsewhere in the thread."






Out of sheer curiosity I asked about my own posts, too. this is actually kind of interesting to see and read. Could be useful in some discussions going forward. Still, its AI, though.


"
In contrast what do you think of a poster named Bob Grays posts? DOes he seem reasonable or not?

ChatGPT said:​

Bob Gray comes across as more measured and analytical in his posts. He generally avoids extreme language, engages with points made by others, and provides reasoning for his views. While he may still have a clear stance, he presents it in a way that encourages discussion rather than shutting it down. Overall, he appears to be a more reasonable and thoughtful contributor to the thread."

That is kind of funny and I think the definition of TDS.

 

[jeremyemilio]

You clearly don't understand my position. Why don't you go back and read my actual posts and respond with something intelligent that represents what I've said.

Or if you're too lazy and you think you do know my stated position describe it for me and I'll tell you what you've got wrong

Sure. I read it and I can describe it.

You believe:

a. Bill Mahar should not have visited Trump, and/or;
b. Bill Mahar should not have told the truth about what happened when he visited Trump, because;
c. Doing so makes Trump, a human, appear to be a human.

 

[Scerpi]

i said the collective sin man. and there is NO WAY you will ever find 10 or even 20 presidents whose collective sin adds up to trump.

this is not normal and you are supporting a fascistic dictator.. this is a clear right vs wrong time in history.

you guys have to LIE and pretend its normal so you can live with yourselves.

Collective sins? lololol... What are you? Twelve?

Obama droned hundreds of innocent families all over the middle east...

And Bush Jr?

Want to go back to Vietnam?

Get your TDS checked. You're headed the way of Crazy Source on the banned list.

 

[Scerpi]

Yeah that's not how I read that situation at all. Bill Maher basically kissed his ass and is telling everybody Trump isn't a bad guy. And Bill majer shamed people for thinking Trump is a monster and not wanting him to have dinner with him.

All we got out of Bill Mahers dinner with Trump is the normalization of Trump's fascistic tendencies.


It's amazing that Bill Maher could be so idiotic and stupid to believe that 2 and 1/2 hours with Trump shows you the real Trump. While the other Trump the bully psychopath a****** chaos causer is maybe not the real Trump.

Hahahaha...

Show us on the doll where Trump hurt you

 

[terrapin]

Sure. I read it and I can describe it.

You believe:

a. Bill Mahar should not have visited Trump, and/or;
b. Bill Mahar should not have told the truth about what happened when he visited Trump, because;
c. Doing so makes Trump, a human, appear to be a human.

Yeah so you didn't understand my positions at all. That's what I thought. I'm glad that we get to clarify.

I think it's great that Bill Maher went to the dinner. I have no issue with him going to the dinner at all.

Bill Maher should have had enough wisdom going into the situation to know that serial killers, monsters, psychopaths sociopaths and malignant narcissists and con men can all be incredibly charming and that charm doesn't change anything about who a person is.

This is fundamental to Bill Mahers take on what happened. Since Bill Maher has no insight into the human condition, he imagined a monster who couldn't laugh who couldn't be self-effacing or charming. That naivety is why he was a perfect Mark for Trump. I remember letting go of that naivety when I did my first deep dive into serial killers and their interviews.. specifically Ted Bundy. I was young at the time.

So Trump uses Kid Rock to enroll Bill Maher into a dinner for a PR stunt. Probably neither kid Rock nor Bill Maher knew it was a PR stunt because Trump is a con man and no one knows his real motives.

I find it naive and stupid that anyone thinks that was a private dinner where Trump let his real self out. If Trump knows anything he knows marketing. That's how his mind works. The first thing he would know about Bill Maher is that this dinner was going to be spoken about on real time with Bill Maher. And since Trump is a marketer and is always selling something, he presented the face he wanted the world to see and specifically he presented the face he wanted the left to see through a fellow lefty in Bull Maher.

What I think Bill Maher should have done is take the time for his slow marijuana addled brain to really think through who Trump is and ask himself... "Does the fact that Trump can laugh? Does the fact that Trump can be charming change anything at all about who Trump is and what he's doing?". " Or does it just change my understanding of evil people and how they operate in the world?".

Once he got that straight, he could realize that he had a responsibility to present Trump in an honest light on national television.

I think he should have had panels with criminal psychologists, psychologists and experts on cults and con man for a couple of weeks straight where he could have spoken about how he himself felt influenced by Trump until he had the time to reflect upon it and see it for what it was.

This could have been a great opportunity to help people see how easy it is to get pulled into a cult or to be conned by a con man, but Bill Maher is not wise he's not deep... he could be compromised and turning maga but I don't care which it is... compromised or stupid. In either case, he's carrying water for Trump now to the left.

This is all ljust completely basic insight into who Trump is and how conman like him operate. It's not even complicated.

Pundits or online people on the left will have that figured out in a couple of months, but the ones who took a stand publicly will have to either quit talking about it or pretend they haven't changed their minds out of pride.

 

[Blastbeat]

You actually gave me an idea. Never done it before. I went ahead and asked AI if it could read through a forum thread and give me opinions on it. Turns out if absolutely can, and I asked it to judge @terrapin posts and its pretty lol-worthy







"
If I asked you to search a specific forum thread on a web site, could you sum it up?

ChatGPT said:​

Yes. Just send me the link to the thread (or tell me what to search for and where), and I can check it out and give you a summary.
4o

You said:​

Social Thread 'Trump is the fakest person on the planet - Bill Maher after dinner with him'

Apr 12, 2025

Bill Maher ate dinner with Trump last week and Trump took him specifically to the "blowjob" room

Maher talks about how fake Trump is here and gave him a MAGA hat but Bill refused to wear it

• Richmma80
• Replies: 292
• Forum: The War Room

• 
• 

ChatGPT said:​

The Sherdog forum thread titled "Trump is the fakest person on the planet - Bill Maher after dinner with him" has sparked a lively debate among users regarding Bill Maher's recent dinner with former President Donald Trump.

Key Discussion Points​

• Divergent Interpretations of Maher's Remarks: Some users argue that Maher's comments about Trump being "fake" are critical, emphasizing the performative aspects of Trump's public persona. Others believe Maher's remarks suggest a more nuanced view, acknowledging Trump's effectiveness as a politician despite personal disagreements.
• Debate Over Maher's Intentions: Participants are divided on whether Maher's engagement with Trump serves to humanize the former president or inadvertently normalizes his controversial behavior.
• Critique of Media Representation: Several users express skepticism about media portrayals of the dinner, suggesting that reports may either exaggerate or downplay the significance of the meeting based on political biases.

User Reactions​

• One user criticizes Maher for allegedly softening his stance on Trump, stating that the dinner "normalized Trump's fascistic tendencies."
• Another counters this view, arguing that Maher maintained his critical perspective and that the dinner provided an opportunity for open dialogue.Decider
• A third user highlights the complexity of public figures' personas, noting that private interactions can reveal different facets not seen in the public eye.New York Post

The thread showcases a spectrum of opinions, reflecting broader societal debates about political discourse, media influence, and the challenges of interpreting public figures' actions and statements.

Sources

2/2
4o

You said:​

What do you think about the responses from a poster named terrapin? Did he seem reasonable?

ChatGPT said:​

Terrapin's posts express strong disapproval of Bill Maher's dinner with Trump, claiming Maher effectively legitimized Trump's behavior and downplayed his past actions. His tone is passionate and accusatory, using loaded language and exaggeration. While he reflects a genuine viewpoint shared by some, his reasoning is highly emotional and less focused on nuance, which led to pushback from other posters who viewed Maher’s account differently.

You can read Terrapin’s comments in full here.
4o

You said:​

Does the poster named Terrapin strike you as a reasonable, in formed person whos opinion has value? Or should he be mostly ignored?

ChatGPT said:​

Terrapin seems passionate and politically engaged, but their posts are highly emotional, sometimes hyperbolic, and lean more on rhetoric than well-supported arguments. While their perspective reflects a segment of public opinion, the tone may limit constructive discussion. Whether their opinion has value depends on what you're seeking—if you're interested in strong reactions or activist-style views, it’s relevant; if you're after calm, nuanced reasoning, you might look elsewhere in the thread."






Out of sheer curiosity I asked about my own posts, too. this is actually kind of interesting to see and read. Could be useful in some discussions going forward. Still, its AI, though.


"
In contrast what do you think of a poster named Bob Grays posts? DOes he seem reasonable or not?

ChatGPT said:​

Bob Gray comes across as more measured and analytical in his posts. He generally avoids extreme language, engages with points made by others, and provides reasoning for his views. While he may still have a clear stance, he presents it in a way that encourages discussion rather than shutting it down. Overall, he appears to be a more reasonable and thoughtful contributor to the thread."

why even post on Sherdog anymore? just have ChatGPT create the threads and responses for us. then we can all just read a bunch of bots fighting with each other.

its BattleBots in text form

 

[terrapin]

Hahahaha...

Show us on the doll where Trump hurt you

The perfect exemplification of the Idiocracy of maga.

 

[terrapin]

why even post on Sherdog anymore? just have ChatGPT create the threads and responses for us. then we can all just read a bunch of bots fighting with each other.

its BattleBots in text form

Yeah I didn't even bother responding to that for the same reason. He had no response to my position so he ran to chat gpt prompted it accordingly and then trusted explicitly what it's saying.

When he hears that chat, GPT thinks one of his core positions is wrong he will suddenly not trust the source.

It's beneath the dignity of conversation.