Social Trump is taking hydroxy

[chardog]

You think hydroxychloroquine will kill you.

I can't imagine being that stupid.

but remdesivir good!

never mind liver damage, acute kidney damage, septic shock, as long as not endorsed by orange man.

 

[Queen B]

BREAKING: WHO releases largest study in Hydroxychloroquine shows it is more likely to kill than heal

 

[HunterSdVa29]

Took it for 1.5 years, am completely fine

 

[Get To Da Choppa]

It's ridiculous how a drug that's been used for over 60 years and is on the UN's essential drug list can cause so much doom and gloom reactions. I've read a lot of medical research papers, and checked out the reviews of peer doctors analyzing and critiquing the studies, and the general thinking is that hydroxychloroquine with zinc is effective in stopping the replication of virus, especially if they are administered early in the onset of symptoms.

There have been a lot of critiques about the trials that showed hydroxycholoroquine had no effects or even detrimental effects. The recent study out of NY that have been cited by mainstream media suffered from design flaws. The treated patients were much sicker than the non-treated control group, and more of the studied group came from demographics more prone to the symptoms of COVID-19 (see comments from publication). The retrospective VA study used subjects very late in the COVID-19 infection stage, and the HCQ group had twice the incidence of lympopenia. As with the the study by the Lancet, it's more the antibiotics used (macrolides/azithromycin) that contribute to the heart problems (QT prolongation), especially on older patients. Furthermore the deceased patients have a much higher obesity rate than the survivors (61% vs. 27%), and had a higher ventilator usage. As with retrospective studies, there could be many confounding variables such as miscoding of patient symptoms and unreported underlying conditions. I don't believe we have seen a large scale randomized clinical trial of hydroxychloroquine plus zinc effects with properly controlled placebo group. As with most drugs, the earlier the administration (at the onset of symptoms) the more effective they will be at inhibiting the virus replication.

In a crisis like this it is very unproductive to politicize treatment drugs. As with science, there is a fair degree of uncertainty with most things, but the media should not be so irresponsible to print click-bait headlines without having read the study and peer reviews. The more drugs we have in our arsenal the better, and we can review the effects and the political ramifications (hydroxychloroquine vs. Remedsivir) after we have overcome the pandemic.

 

[44nutman]

So he says he'll stop taking it in a few days... so... he thinks it will give him some sort of lasting immunity?? What an idiot. Does he take antibiotics in january so he wont get an infection for the rest of the year??

Wear a condom once and never worry about getting anyone pregnant again.

 

[J0N0]

https://www.theguardian.com/science...d-19-cure-increases-deaths-global-study-finds
Hydroxychloroquine, the anti-malarial drug Donald Trump is taking to prevent Covid-19, has increased deaths in patients treated with it in hospitals around the world, a study has shown.

Not much doubt in my mind that he was just promoting it on behalf of some big pharma company.

 

[hillelslovak87]

https://www.commondreams.org/news/2...-shows-trump-usual-dangerously-wrong-covid-19
Lancet Study on Hydroxychloroquine Shows Trump 'As Usual, Is Dangerously Wrong' on Covid-19 Guidance
"If there was ever hope for this drug, this is the death of it."

You fucking retards, listening to a conman for medical advice when he can't even say the name of the treatment, and thinks you can do disinfectant flushes of your lungs.

 

[calavera2]

It's ridiculous how a drug that's been used for over 60 years and is on the UN's essential drug list can cause so much doom and gloom reactions. I've read a lot of medical research papers, and checked out the reviews of peer doctors analyzing and critiquing the studies, and the general thinking is that hydroxychloroquine with zinc is effective in stopping the replication of virus, especially if they are administered early in the onset of symptoms.

There have been a lot of critiques about the trials that showed hydroxycholoroquine had no effects or even detrimental effects. The recent study out of NY that have been cited by mainstream media suffered from design flaws. The treated patients were much sicker than the non-treated control group, and more of the studied group came from demographics more prone to the symptoms of COVID-19 (see comments from publication). The retrospective VA study used subjects very late in the COVID-19 infection stage, and the HCQ group had twice the incidence of lympopenia. As with the the study by the Lancet, it's more the antibiotics used (macrolides/azithromycin) that contribute to the heart problems (QT prolongation), especially on older patients. Furthermore the deceased patients have a much higher obesity rate than the survivors (61% vs. 27%), and had a higher ventilator usage. As with retrospective studies, there could be many confounding variables such as miscoding of patient symptoms and unreported underlying conditions. I don't believe we have seen a large scale randomized clinical trial of hydroxychloroquine plus zinc effects with properly controlled placebo group. As with most drugs, the earlier the administration (at the onset of symptoms) the more effective they will be at inhibiting the virus replication.

In a crisis like this it is very unproductive to politicize treatment drugs. As with science, there is a fair degree of uncertainty with most things, but the media should not be so irresponsible to print click-bait headlines without having read the study and peer reviews. The more drugs we have in our arsenal the better, and we can review the effects and the political ramifications (hydroxychloroquine vs. Remedsivir) after we have overcome the pandemic.

There is nothing wrong with the drug. It's wrong for someone with no medical understanding and who suggested injecting disinfectant to try to sell it as a miracle cure for coronavirus. It's not that difficult to understand.

 

[hillelslovak87]

There is nothing wrong with the drug. It's wrong for someone with no medical understanding and who suggested injecting disinfectant to try to sell it as a miracle cure for coronavirus. It's not that difficult to understand.

It's really disturbing how stupid these people have become in service of Trump.

The idea that this drug could have been useful for decades, but not for the new virus that sprang up this year, seems entirely beyond the pale to them; a foreign concept.

You know, because when you go to the doctor and tell him you're sick, he just grabs a bottle of ACME-CureAll medicine off the shelf and sends you on your way.

 

[calavera2]

It's really disturbing how stupid these people have become in service of Trump.

The idea that this drug could have been useful for decades, but not for the new virus that sprang up this year, seems entirely beyond the pale to them; a foreign concept.

You know, because when you go to the doctor and tell him you're sick, he just grabs a bottle of ACME-CureAll medicine off the shelf and sends you on your way.

I think most of these Trump supporters understand this...but can't reconcile their love for the guy with the fact that Trump is such a huge moron that he would suggest injecting disinfectant and try to hoc a novel untested treatment.

 

[Queen B]

It's ridiculous how a drug that's been used for over 60 years and is on the UN's essential drug list can cause so much doom and gloom reactions. I've read a lot of medical research papers, and checked out the reviews of peer doctors analyzing and critiquing the studies, and the general thinking is that hydroxychloroquine with zinc is effective in stopping the replication of virus, especially if they are administered early in the onset of symptoms.

There have been a lot of critiques about the trials that showed hydroxycholoroquine had no effects or even detrimental effects. The recent study out of NY that have been cited by mainstream media suffered from design flaws. The treated patients were much sicker than the non-treated control group, and more of the studied group came from demographics more prone to the symptoms of COVID-19 (see comments from publication). The retrospective VA study used subjects very late in the COVID-19 infection stage, and the HCQ group had twice the incidence of lympopenia. As with the the study by the Lancet, it's more the antibiotics used (macrolides/azithromycin) that contribute to the heart problems (QT prolongation), especially on older patients. Furthermore the deceased patients have a much higher obesity rate than the survivors (61% vs. 27%), and had a higher ventilator usage. As with retrospective studies, there could be many confounding variables such as miscoding of patient symptoms and unreported underlying conditions. I don't believe we have seen a large scale randomized clinical trial of hydroxychloroquine plus zinc effects with properly controlled placebo group. As with most drugs, the earlier the administration (at the onset of symptoms) the more effective they will be at inhibiting the virus replication.

In a crisis like this it is very unproductive to politicize treatment drugs. As with science, there is a fair degree of uncertainty with most things, but the media should not be so irresponsible to print click-bait headlines without having read the study and peer reviews. The more drugs we have in our arsenal the better, and we can review the effects and the political ramifications (hydroxychloroquine vs. Remedsivir) after we have overcome the pandemic.

Lets deny the actual study done with a Control Group

 

[SBJJ]

Lets deny the actual study done with a Control Group

Oh. Another OBSERVATIONAL study. How did I know

 

[HereticBD]

Oh. Another OBSERVATIONAL study. How did I know

Hey man, some people who were on deaths door weren't magically cured by it. Better toss it out, along with chemotherapy...

 

[lifelessheap]

Please pay attention: Donald Trump the former Democrat now Republican President who promised to save to save America by building a wall against Hispanics cannot save you from Coronavirus. Donald Trump is NOT a doctor he has NO medical knowledge, he has NO idea about the efficacy of using Hydroxy agains the Coronavirus. If you have any concerns please contact a medical professional.

A lot of them are getting in trouble for giving friends and family these drugs to keep them safe. Lmao. But hey...

 

[HereticBD]

I sure wouldn't want to be someone who is taking this for any reason right now. Thanks to Trump taking it, it will soon be relegated to Crack and Heroin status.

 

[calavera2]

A lot of them are getting in trouble for giving friends and family these drugs to keep them safe. Lmao. But hey...

hey what? Who is getting in trouble? doctors? give it up man, trumps an idiot.

 

[HockeyBjj]

Lets deny the actual study done with a Control Group

In fairness sake, that’s treating very ill Covid patients with Hydroxy.

Trump is using Hydroxy before he ever potentially gets sick. The appeal of Hydroxy is the potential prevention effectiveness of the drug, it’s looking like treatment of Covid once it’s already established in a person, Hydroxy doesn’t really help it or it possibly even hurts

As a prevention, there’s multiple places giving hydroxy to healthcare workers. At least 40,000 in various hospitals in the UK. Mayo Clinic has sent out emails for ICU nurses to consider taking Hydroxy, and to let them know so they can be included in an effectiveness study.

There’s smart people thinking there are potential benefits of Hydroxy as a prevention drug. It’s not just Trump going rogue and having a dr that gave it to him because why not.

 

[fungi]

...

To me, this photo looks like this "doctor" is inviting his patients to a kinky dungeon for private sessions.

Maybe it's just me, maybe it's Maybelline...

P.s. whoever mentioned "The Dude", I disagree.

 

[superpunch]

In fairness sake, that’s treating very ill Covid patients with Hydroxy.

Trump is using Hydroxy before he ever potentially gets sick. The appeal of Hydroxy is the potential prevention effectiveness of the drug, it’s looking like treatment of Covid once it’s already established in a person, Hydroxy doesn’t really help it or it possibly even hurts

As a prevention, there’s multiple places giving hydroxy to healthcare workers. At least 40,000 in various hospitals in the UK. Mayo Clinic has sent out emails for ICU nurses to consider taking Hydroxy, and to let them know so they can be included in an effectiveness study.

There’s smart people thinking there are potential benefits of Hydroxy as a prevention drug. It’s not just Trump going rogue and having a dr that gave it to him because why not.

Interesting. I found this article. I don't think anyone knows for sure. People hating on Trump though are literally just doing it because it's Trump.

HCQ breakthrough: ICMR finds it’s effective in preventing coronavirus, expands its use
Three studies find that hydroxychloroquine reduces chances of contracting Covid, so ICMR allows more frontline workers to take it as a preventive drug.
https://theprint.in/health/hcq-breakthrough-icmr-finds-its-effective-in-preventing-coronavirus-expands-its-use/

 

[ShinkanPo]

Why? To trigger the libs I guess



https://www.wsj.com/articles/presid...taking-hydroxychloroquine-11589834484?mod=mhp

Trump is not my Presidente.. I am not from America.

Go shit on him all you want but let me guess he has done more for the whole world than anyone else during this horrific pandemic he volunteered himself to take this Hydrocolorqueen drug as a test guineepeg!

He should receive a medal for that alone!