Elections Trump is rigging the Republican primary, by not having one

[ObamaPhoneLady]

Whose we? Aren't you a Canuck? Is Trump busing in Canadians for votes now?

Maybe he's an American citizen who lives in Canada. Like me.

 

[Natty Dread]

Ts is another trotsy-esque idiot moron. Hopefully one day you find some communist shit hole forum you can fuck off to.

 

[sambobeer]

I don't care what it's called. It's just my response to your post strictly calling out "the right" for this nonsense. It's not party specific. Everyone seems to be putting their own best interests aside just so "their team" can win.

It was a post addressing the thread topic. Trump is robbing us blind and denigrating democracy. If thats worth feeling some imaginary

Oh fuck off. The left is just as guilty of this.

this is whataboutery. Take responsibility for your side of the aisle

 

[ObamaPhoneLady]

It was a post addressing the thread topic. Trump is robbing us blind and denigrating democracy. If thats worth feeling some imaginary
this is whataboutery. Take responsibility for your side of the aisle

You first.

 

[Jorge Luis Borges]

Uhh, no. It's not the presidential election that promotes the formation of two large parties.

It's the single member district plurality voting system broken down rigidly by geographic district that leads to two parties. Because in each district, the highest vote-getter receives all the electoral benefit, regardless of whether they received 20% or 100% of the vote. That creates a much, much stronger incentive to monopolize votes than a proportionally representative parliamentary system in which each party receives seats relatively equal to their vote share, regardless of plurality status.

I think we agree that it is winner take all elections that create the so-called two party system. However, I think winner takes all executive elections give the biggest incentive for otherwise diverse interests to find common cause in big tent parties. If we made the one change of allowing whichever coalition controlled the House to select the executive, we'd see a greater multiplicity of parties with elected representatives in Congress.

 

[K-Bag]

The Dems are rigging it for Trump.

 

[Devout Pessimist]

Even the Dems know they don't have a chance with their clown-show candidates. That is why they are pushing so hard for impeachment.

 

[glenwo2]

He could be. It's a bit hard to compare him with previous races.

Everything is different from past races.

Our President is different.

The LEFT is "different"(and not in a good way)

And I think this coming election will be "different".


But I still think despite everything, that Trump stays on for another 4 seasons (Years) of the "Donald Trump : American President" TV Show.

 

[KONG-D'SNT-TAP]

The American people wanted Trump and voted him in. No need for Republicans to try finding a new candidate.

No they didn’t. In fact he got 3 million less votes completely contradicting your stupidity

 

[Sketch]

No they didn’t. In fact he got 3 million less votes completely contradicting your stupidity

Yeah, and how many of those were from illegals?

Doesn't matter anyway, we have the electoral college for a reason.

 

[7437]

Yeah, and how many of those were from illegals?

Doesn't matter anyway, we have the electoral college for a reason.

If I recall the president's investigation into illegals voting correctly, 0.

 

[oldshadow]

Please show how many first term presidents ran in a primary when they chose to run for a second term.

 

[all caps]

In what world is it legal to investigate yourself and clear yourself of wrong doing?

Communist Cuba maybe?

The police do this, no?

 

[Confucamus]

No they didn’t. In fact he got 3 million less votes completely contradicting your stupidity

How did he get elected then?

 

[Rational Poster]

The police do this, no?

The question wasn't whether it was done or not, but whether it is legal.

 

[PolishHeadlock2]