Elections Trump Indicted On 91 Counts

[CantCucktheTuck]

What is sad is that they have just flushed Section III of the 14th amendment. It's there for a reason Scrotus.

Cope and seethe

 

[CatchnShoot]

Cope and seethe

lol.

I'm doing my best, friend.

Any tips? You've been living in it for at least a year since Bragg brought the first indictment against Smelvis.

Honestly, it was the expected result, although I'd be lying if I said I wasn't disappointed. Like when the Lions lost... I expected it, but it was still disappointing.

Oh, also today..... no charges against Biden re: Documents.... ain't that a bitch?

Apart from this stuff, I HAVE had a shitty day. I should PUT THE KEYBOARD DOWN!!!!

So I think I will.


Stay well, frenemy.

 

[idrankyourbeer]

lol.

I'm doing my best, friend.

Any tips? You've been living in it for at least a year since Bragg brought the first indictment against Smelvis.

things have been rough for foxnewsfan ever since fox news called arizona for brandon.

 

[mixmastermo]

What is sad is that they have just flushed Section III of the 14th amendment. It's there for a reason Scrotus.

Slippery slope my arsehole.... ALL members of government regardless of position should be excluded from the office of presidency if they commit an insurrection against the constitution.
It's not worded to be a slope, it's worded to be a cliff...as in push insurrectionist the fuck out... full stop.

While I can't stand Trump and do not wish to see him become president again.. I can kinda see why this case would go in his favor.

In very basic terms,

• SCOTUS rulings set a precedent for a very long time that cannot easily be undone, if ever.
• Colorado went ahead and determined Trump engaged in an insurrection, even though he was never convicted for such
• If you give states the right to remove someone from a ballot on something that hasn't been officially established that opens up a gigantic can of worms

I believe that if Trump had in fact been charged and convicted of an insurrection this would have played out differently. This is why even the Democratic justices gave CO a hard time.

 

[HOLA]

Jack Smith claps back at Judge Cannon's 'clear error' in ruling

Smith warns that Cannon's release of documents will lead to intimidation of witnesses in Trump's Florida trial

www.newsweek.com

The judge in Donald Trump's classified documents case made a "clear error" that could expose many witnesses to threats from Trump supporters, special prosecutor Jack Smith has written in a court filing.

He was reacting to Judge Aileen Cannon's decision to release unredacted discovery documents in the case at the request of Trump and media groups.

"That discovery material, if publicly docketed in unredacted form as the Court has ordered, would disclose the identities of numerous potential witnesses, along with the substance of the statements they made to the FBI or the grand jury, exposing them to significant and immediate risks of threats, intimidation, and harassment, as has already happened to witnesses, law enforcement agents, judicial officers, and Department of Justice employees whose identities have been disclosed in cases in which defendant Trump is involved," Smith wrote in a filing to Cannon.

There have been significant threats to court officials in both Trump's election inference cases in Washington and Atlanta, and in his civil fraud trial in New York, all of which were discussed in open court in those cases.

Smith filed a written request to Judge Cannon on February 8, asking her to reconsider her position.

 

[CantCucktheTuck]

Jack Smith claps back at Judge Cannon's 'clear error' in ruling

Smith warns that Cannon's release of documents will lead to intimidation of witnesses in Trump's Florida trial

www.newsweek.com

The judge in Donald Trump's classified documents case made a "clear error" that could expose many witnesses to threats from Trump supporters, special prosecutor Jack Smith has written in a court filing.

He was reacting to Judge Aileen Cannon's decision to release unredacted discovery documents in the case at the request of Trump and media groups.

"That discovery material, if publicly docketed in unredacted form as the Court has ordered, would disclose the identities of numerous potential witnesses, along with the substance of the statements they made to the FBI or the grand jury, exposing them to significant and immediate risks of threats, intimidation, and harassment, as has already happened to witnesses, law enforcement agents, judicial officers, and Department of Justice employees whose identities have been disclosed in cases in which defendant Trump is involved," Smith wrote in a filing to Cannon.

There have been significant threats to court officials in both Trump's election inference cases in Washington and Atlanta, and in his civil fraud trial in New York, all of which were discussed in open court in those cases.

Smith filed a written request to Judge Cannon on February 8, asking her to reconsider her position.

COPE

 

[CatchnShoot]

COPE

Well, ineptitude really, this is black and white law, and once again, Canon gets it wrong.....it's a good thing though, because now Mr. Smith can go to the 11th circuit and have the dizzy cunt removed from the case (she should ACTUALLY be removed from the bench, but that ain't happening).

I admit it could be just outright bias and corruption, but I chose ineptitude being the lessor of the evils IMO.

 

[CatchnShoot]

While I can't stand Trump and do not wish to see him become president again.. I can kinda see why this case would go in his favor.

In very basic terms,

• SCOTUS rulings set a precedent for a very long time that cannot easily be undone, if ever.
• Colorado went ahead and determined Trump engaged in an insurrection, even though he was never convicted for such
• If you give states the right to remove someone from a ballot on something that hasn't been officially established that opens up a gigantic can of worms

I believe that if Trump had in fact been charged and convicted of an insurrection this would have played out differently. This is why even the Democratic justices gave CO a hard time.

So you think that after the D.C. Jan 6th trial that would be enough for this muppet court? I don't think so because they had their minds made up prior to oral arguments IMO. It wouldn't surprise me if 90% of the opinion was written prior to arguments.

But, I'll have to wait until next Friday to know what technicality they use to ignore what to me is obviously disqualifying conduct.

 

[Whippy McGee]

Welp.... there goes the document case against Trump after Biden got a walk as a Senator and VP with no rights to the documents for over 30 years of document theft. That along with the Miami FBI boss testimony that they wanted to negotiate and thought they could get the documents, but DC DOJ would not allow it. Finally, the judge in the case... she's not having any of the Democratic Party bullshit.

The Left Cult in this thread from the start that bought this Lawfare as legitimate are the real suckers. You goofs got played... again. There was no one screaming MAGA at Jussie. There was no noose for Bubba. The Covington kids did not go after the Native American. Illegal Immigrants were not getting whipped by Border Patrol. Trump does have the Presidential Records act and an ongoing negotiation prior to the raid of his wife's closet and son's room.

 

[CatchnShoot]

Welp.... there goes the document case against Trump after Biden got a walk as a Senator and VP with no rights to the documents for over 30 years of document theft. That along with the Miami FBI boss testimony that they wanted to negotiate and thought they could get the documents, but DC DOJ would not allow it. Finally, the judge in the case... she's not having any of the Democratic Party bullshit.

The Left Cult in this thread from the start that bought this Lawfare as legitimate are the real suckers. You goofs got played... again. There was no one screaming MAGA at Jussie. There was no noose for Bubba. The Covington kids did not go after the Native American. Illegal Immigrants were not getting whipped by Border Patrol. Trump does have the Presidential Records act and an ongoing negotiation prior to the raid of his wife's closet and son's room.

You still think the cases are the same? lol.

You are a smart guy, so I can only conclude that you have been brainwashed by your cult indoctrination.

To quote your Orange Smelvis..."Sad".

 

[idrankyourbeer]

Welp.... there goes the document case against Trump after Biden

hold it right there skippy. you seemed to have forgotten that private citizen donald trump is the one who has been indicted for crimes alleged against him, and not president biden. and i don't know if anybody has told you, but donald trump is not being charged with joe biden's speculated "crimes".

a quick ctrl + f for "biden" and i dont see joe biden's name anywhere in the indictment. or the superceding indictment. not even a single mention of this man at all.

strange. it appears as if joe biden is not being tried in this case, will not be a witness or a co-conspirator involved in this crime, and his name will not be spoken in court, as he has nothing at all to do with this case and he was not named in the indictment. whatever brandon did, or in this case, was exonerated by the special counsel and ruled to have committed no crime, has absolutely no bearing on US. Case #9:23-cr-80101. whatever president biden did 3 decades ago, yesterday, tomorrow, or next year has no bearing on this case. president biden is not the one who is being tried for these charges. his name was not even brought up once.

i also don't think that whoever that miami fbi boss who you speak of will be brought up during trial either. but that's just a hunch. i must have missed that part. perhaps you can look on the dockets and find that alleged complaint. maybe they still havent slipped that into evidence yet? what's that guys name again? i guess it doesn't really matter. it's not like he's involved in this case either.

but anyways forget about that. i guess there's no need to try to maintain their clients innocence when they can just stick their fingers in their ears and scream "but hey whatabout joe biden? and hunter biden's cock? ya'll have TDS! this is Lawfare! Political Interference! Witch Hunt!!" because we all know that whataboutism's, fantasies, and perpetual victimhood works so well inside of a courtroom.

 

[mixmastermo]

So you think that after the D.C. Jan 6th trial that would be enough for this muppet court? I don't think so because they had their minds made up prior to oral arguments IMO. It wouldn't surprise me if 90% of the opinion was written prior to arguments.

But, I'll have to wait until next Friday to know what technicality they use to ignore what to me is obviously disqualifying conduct.

I mean, we obviously still have the risk that some justices will side with Trump no matter what.. but I'm saying that because their decisions set a precedent they have to tread carefully with something like this.. which is why even the Democrats may vote against CO.

If they were to uphold CO's decision to remove Trump from the ballot that could potentially open the floodgates for other kinds of nonsense to remove people from primary ballots without going to trial first.

 

[CatchnShoot]

I mean, we obviously still have the risk that some justices will side with Trump no matter what.. but I'm saying that because their decisions set a precedent they have to tread carefully with something like this.. which is why even the Democrats may vote against CO.

If they were to uphold CO's decision to remove Trump from the ballot that could potentially open the floodgates for other kinds of nonsense to remove people from primary ballots without going to trial first.

Well, an insurrection against the constitution has happened exactly ONCE in the last 150 years so, I don't think it's a real concern. It's an excuse NOT to do their job.

Don't follow the constitution NOW, or we may have to dismiss some spurious future allegations? That makes absolutely zero sense. Why have ANY laws?
I mean, somebody down the line may be falsely accused... wtf are they saying here?

Don't disqualify the guy that actually DID try to disenfranchise 80+ Million voters, let's give him another go???
Jesus Christ, it's so nonsensical. It doesn't matter how popular the guy is with a portion of the country, there were millions of folks that would have elected any number of confederate Generals, but they were not afforded the opportunity...Trump should be disqualified from the office.

As I said earlier... why focus on the painfully obvious when you can use minutiae and technicality to avoid doing the right thing. Not the politically expedient thing, the RIGHT thing, (as determined by the constitution in this case).

What galls me the most is that Scotus very clearly had their minds made up prior to oral arguments. It's not supposed to be like that.

 

[Whippy McGee]

What is sad is that they have just flushed Section III of the 14th amendment. It's there for a reason Scrotus.

Slippery slope my arsehole.... ALL members of government regardless of position should be excluded from the office of presidency if they commit an insurrection against the constitution.
It's not worded to be a slope, it's worded to be a cliff...as in push insurrectionist the fuck out... full stop.

No. They are saving our vote. If they ruled that Colorado could do this, then all the Red States and those swing states with Republican AG's and Supreme Courts could take Biden right off the ballots for the same section 3 citing that he aided and comforted the enemy with the billions to Iran, or the open border for terrorists, etc. We would end up having elections where a few mixed swing states that didn't have the same party AG and courts decided for everyone. Justice Rehnquist even shared this scenario if you listened to the audio. He must be a Sherbro, because I floated this scenrio here before the case was heard. You're welcome judge.... I know you read my stuff now.

You're asking for a fucked up system. State's don't get to decide insurrection... or who aided the enemy.

 

[Whippy McGee]

Sooooo.... The documents case is a huge bust now, unless the Justice Department wants to look completely fucked. It was already pretty much toast, but this should put a final dagger in the case and give the Justice Department an out to back off. They already drew a terrible judge for their agenda. They already have the D.C. DOJ Office fucking the whole case up with the raid in the first place over the objections of the Miami FBI Office. It's toast. I would love to watch the videos of the D.C. team going through Baron's room and trashing it along with Melania's wardrobe. I still hope those tapes get released.

These 91 counts are going to evaporate as predicted. To conduct this lawfare to win an election made Trump a martyr. What a stupid move by the Democrats.

 

[CantCucktheTuck]

hold it right there skippy. you seemed to have forgotten that private citizen donald trump is the one who has been indicted for crimes alleged against him, and not president biden. and i don't know if anybody has told you, but donald trump is not being charged with joe biden's speculated "crimes".

a quick ctrl + f for "biden" and i dont see joe biden's name anywhere in the indictment. or the superceding indictment. not even a single mention of this man at all.

strange. it appears as if joe biden is not being tried in this case, will not be a witness or a co-conspirator involved in this crime, and his name will not be spoken in court, as he has nothing at all to do with this case and he was not named in the indictment. whatever brandon did, or in this case, was exonerated by the special counsel and ruled to have committed no crime, has absolutely no bearing on US. Case #9:23-cr-80101. whatever president biden did 3 decades ago, yesterday, tomorrow, or next year has no bearing on this case. president biden is not the one who is being tried for these charges. his name was not even brought up once.

i also don't think that whoever that miami fbi boss who you speak of will be brought up during trial either. but that's just a hunch. i must have missed that part. perhaps you can look on the dockets and find that alleged complaint. maybe they still havent slipped that into evidence yet? what's that guys name again? i guess it doesn't really matter. it's not like he's involved in this case either.

but anyways forget about that. i guess there's no need to try to maintain their clients innocence when they can just stick their fingers in their ears and scream "but hey whatabout joe biden? and hunter biden's cock? ya'll have TDS! this is Lawfare! Political Interference! Witch Hunt!!" because we all know that whataboutism's, fantasies, and perpetual victimhood works so well inside of a courtroom.

91 nothingburgers and you’re still hungry.

 

[Sinister]

Trump Attorney to SCOTUS: "January 6th was not an insurrection by any imaginable definition of the word!!"

Trump 45 minutes later outside the Court House: "THIS INSURRECTION WAS THE FAULT OF NANCY PELOSI!!"

 

[andnowweknow]

While I can't stand Trump and do not wish to see him become president again.. I can kinda see why this case would go in his favor.

In very basic terms,

• SCOTUS rulings set a precedent for a very long time that cannot easily be undone, if ever.
• Colorado went ahead and determined Trump engaged in an insurrection, even though he was never convicted for such
• If you give states the right to remove someone from a ballot on something that hasn't been officially established that opens up a gigantic can of worms

I believe that if Trump had in fact been charged and convicted of an insurrection this would have played out differently. This is why even the Democratic justices gave CO a hard time.

This never would have been before the Supreme Court if he had been convicted of such an offense. He'd be in prison for the rest of his life if he was convicted.

 

[idrankyourbeer]

Sooooo.... The documents case is a huge bust now, unless the Justice Department wants to look completely fucked. It was already pretty much toast, but this should put a final dagger in the case and give the Justice Department an out to back off. They already drew a terrible judge for their agenda. They already have the D.C. DOJ Office fucking the whole case up with the raid in the first place over the objections of the Miami FBI Office. It's toast. I would love to watch the videos of the D.C. team going through Baron's room and trashing it along with Melania's wardrobe. I still hope those tapes get released.

These 91 counts are going to evaporate as predicted. To conduct this lawfare to win an election made Trump a martyr. What a stupid move by the Democrats.

that's some cool fanfiction there skippy. perhaps if you just stamp your feet and scream "Lawfare!" "TDS!" and "But Hunter's Laptop!" at the sky, all of those 91 felony charges against citizen trump will magically just go away.

so far they haven't. not a single one. tick tock motherfucker! you better better stamp those feet a little louder i guess. maybe throw a little more expression on the whole lawfare thing while you call yourselves the party of law and order as you struggle to cope with established fraudsters and rapists being held accountable for their crimes. the louder you pretend to be the victim, the more true it will make your shit sandwiches that you're selling! and hey, if things don't go the way you want, i guess you can always just beat up some more cops with your blue lives matter flags in a fit of rage and then get hauled off to jail just to own the libs. worked out well for the last heap of maga trash rage babies now didn't it?

law and order baby. the party of personal accountability.

 

[idrankyourbeer]

91 nothingburgers and you’re still hungry.

not really. i've had my fill of those after seeing president biden getting completely exonerated yesterday after that witch hunter who was investigating him couldn't even find a parking ticket or an overdue library book on the guy and ruled that he had committed no crime. let's go brandon! lock him up!

that was a juicy one hey? i'd say that's right up there with those twitter files, the durham report, hunter biden's laptop, and maybe even your cute little stollen election thingy too.