- Joined
- Mar 10, 2008
- Messages
- 7,530
- Reaction score
- 6,900
LOL! Gonna be tough considering he wouldn't rule out use of force to take over Greenland.
He is very open minded.
LOL! Gonna be tough considering he wouldn't rule out use of force to take over Greenland.
Is this a joke ? Trump has given Israel 12 billion in military aid while Biden gave Israel 94 Billion.Israel is our ally… you really think that last question is going to go well for Trump?
Of course you don't because hypocrisy doesn't bother you.
You morons change opinions and ideologies like a woman trying to decide what dress to wear.
This you?
Yes , I'm pointing out that the US has played an active role in arming and sanctioning Saudi adventures into Yemen. It's not like ths Houthis one day decided they wanted to attack US ships for no reason
Well Bibi has video of Trump partying down at Epstein's place.Yeah striking Iran at Israel‘s request was #1 bullshit. What is it with Murrka being some gloryhole for Israel it‘s embarrassing.
No it isn’t. I get it you’re kind of an idiot but I believe you’re in here enough to have seen the news headlines with Israel in this forum. You must have forgotten so I’ll refresh your memory- they had a whole bombing campaign that was over a week long with Iran that brought us to into it. This week they started bombing Syria. You know what makes it worse? This time our ally is the aggressor. With Biden they were responding to an attack.Is this a joke ? Trump has given Israel 12 billion in military aid while Biden gave Israel 94 Billion.
The war started when Biden was in office incase you are unaware.
12 billion in military funding is less than 94 billion. Case closed. The argument was who is dropping more bombs aka who is funding more death and destruction.No it isn’t. I get it you’re kind of an idiot but I believe you’re in here enough to have seen the news headlines with Israel in this forum. You must have forgotten so I’ll refresh your memory- they had a whole bombing campaign that was over a week long with Iran that brought us to into it. This week they started bombing Syria. You know what makes it worse? This time our ally is the aggressor. With Biden they were responding to an attack.
The best part of this is I don’t think this is even a particularly important metric that you chose, but you managed to display your complete lack of awareness of the situation when you wrote it.
You said missles fired not funding approved. Do you need to be educated on the difference or is this a cheap tactic to try and defend a comment you now realize was stupid?12 billion in military funding is less than 94 billion. Case closed. The argument was who is dropping more bombs aka who is funding more death and destruction.
Yeah I don't know if you are aware but not all missiles are fired immediately, they need to keep stockpiles, if you shoot your load right away and have nothing defensively you are done.You said missles fired not funding approved. Do you need to be educated on the difference or is this a cheap tactic to try and defend a comment you now realize was stupid?
Edit: BTW where you even getting 94 billion from? I just googled it and got 53 billion from Biden after OCT 7th
So going back this was in the thread about getting out of Afghanistan and the democrats were trying to block Trump getting troops out.
Yea we had boots on the ground in Afghanistan. We tried the whole stupid shit of bringing democery and wins hearts and minds bullshit. As I stated we never should have had our people on the ground except for special forces operations that are in and out.
The Biden administration fucked up even the getting out.
So my point stands. Im against boots on the ground where we should not be. However if you fuck with us then I support flatten every bit of their military and any support facilities.
Amazing how all of a sudden there's nuance to what you said, yet when speaking about anyone other than Trump, all nuance is removed and it's just "it's the democrats that are warhawks, not Trump!!", repeatedly I might add.
You dug this no-nuance grave, not me. Perhaps in the future you can start by applying nuance to all situations, not just when defending dear leader.
lol so you’re now trying to weasel it as Biden paid for the missles, so they count against him even though they are being fired under Trumps Presidency? Do you think that was a solid twist in logic?Yeah I don't know if you are aware but not all missiles are fired immediately, they need to keep stockpiles, if you shoot your load right away and have nothing defensively you are done.
Missiles are only one part of what these funds go to, the crux of this argument is that Biden sponsored far more death and suffering than Trump.
94 billion is during his entire term, October 7th was during his third year... Just as 12 billion is under Trumps entire term thus far...
Dude is scared to talk to anybody about anything. Great for everyone’s reaction score though@itstyme
So who put regular troops on the ground. I said that decision was a bad idea.
So your scared to answer that.
Probably more to do with your hundreds of posts of sticking up for Iran in the Iran thread ..Got to love that pointing out the US' longstanding involvement in Yemen must mean pro Iran in your bird brain.
Quote me where I "stuck up for Iran"Probably more to do with your hundreds of posts of sticking up for Iran in the Iran thread ..