Law Trump Georgia indictment watch

[HARRISON_3]

I'm trying to figure out which poster that is.

It's somebody's alt; they sound so similar.

Like John Baron/David Dennison/John Miller/Donald Trump

 

[Andy Capp]

"criminal organization"

I would be willing to bet if she brings RICO charges she has the receipts to establish that aspect of the case with confidence. Honesty has nothing to do with it. Why attempt to pin a questionable charge on him--assuming you're right--when they appear to have him dead to rights on lots of other serious charges? In fact, we see this all the time concerning prosecutions--why aren't they charging X with y or z, and the answer is always because they feel confident they can secure a conviction on the stuff they actually did charge X with but are not so sure about y or z. It makes no sense whatsoever because even if you are biased against Trump the one thing you should want more than anything is to make securing a conviction a stone cold slam dunk. I can't believe this woman would lose site of that standard practice just to "own the conservatives" or whatever you might think motives her to be dishonest at this juncture.

By the way I don't think it's a big deal either way--just arguing the logic of it.

 

[IDGETKTFO]

I'm trying to figure out which poster that is.

It's somebody's alt; they sound so similar.

Like John Baron/David Dennison/John Miller/Donald Trump

Gene Cope?

 

[BFoe]

Agreed. This actually sounds like extortion (or whatever it'd be called). IMHO the Jan 6th stuff, Russia collusion, etc. is all flimsy, politically motivated or even just pointless (the confidential files, for example) to pursue. This actually has teeth and makes sense, because there's direct evidence that he was trying to do something dubious. I assume "find me the votes" was not like, fabricate them but get discounted votes to count somehow or something, but it def sounded like circumventing the process to favor him.

Re: Jan 6, are you talking about Trump’s impeachment, or are you talking about the indictment from Jack Smith? For the record, I don’t think anything is flimsy about either of them, but there’s certainly nothing flimsy about Jack Smtih’s indictment. Trump is in real trouble there.

 

[ShadowRun]

Do you think Biden sits in front of a computer and decides what price to put for gas? Is the U.S the only country in the world struggling with the price of oil, energy, and overall inflation?

No but is polices and regulation’s definitely effects the production of oil and long term strategy plans . To act like the president has no influence on gas prices is ignorant. About a year ago Biden took credit when gas went down about 80 cents …

On the subject I think Trump is in real trouble here . All the other stuff not so much

 

[Poatan Power]

Re: Jan 6, are you talking about Trump’s impeachment, or are you talking about the indictment from Jack Smith? For the record, I don’t think anything is flimsy about either of them, but there’s certainly nothing flimsy about Jack Smtih’s indictment. Trump is in real trouble there.

specifically "inciting and encouraging violence"

before any investigations were down it just seems the left was content on writing the narrative that Trump incited a riot, despite being glued to the TV all day I came away with quite the opposite impression. this whole January 6th thing, the criminal proceedings with the protestors, etc. has been hella weird to me.

 

[HARRISON_3]

Gene Cope?

Nah.

Gene was definitely a Trump guy, but he mostly threw down a few zingers and the occasional Emilia Clarke gif.

He was a good dude.

 

[LangfordBarrow]

Like the fact that there were more votes than eligible voters? Or that they were literally blocking windows in Detroit with cardboard and wouldn't let Republican poll watchers in? Or in Atlanta there was a "water main break" and they sent everybody home...except democrat counters. Or in Philadelphia where Biden was down over 700,000 votes and magically caught up and surpasses Trump?

Then the counting resumed after the republican poll watchers left and Biden got hundreds of thousands of votes in all cases and none for Trump. Statistically impossible.

If you believe 2020 was legit, you're a low iq individual.

Bamboo fibers, the evidence is coming in so fast... low IQ is right.

 

[DavidsGhost]

Oh I understand your point. "Orange man bad. Biden good." Keep being brainwashed.

Lmao
“Orange man bad”

You believe people lifted this from the context of being triggered by trump tweets and now say it about Trump trying to reject a whole ass Democratic election

 

[emefer]

Rico is a racist never trumper.

 

[DavidsGhost]

Water gate

 

[BFoe]

specifically "inciting and encouraging violence"

before any investigations were down it just seems the left was content on writing the narrative that Trump incited a riot, despite being glued to the TV all day I came away with quite the opposite impression. this whole January 6th thing, the criminal proceedings with the protestors, etc. has been hella weird to me.

Trump hasn’t been charged with incitement by Jack Smith though. Incitement was one of the impeachment articles in his 2nd impeachment, and impeachment has a totally different standard than a criminal proceeding.

I think specifically scheduling a… ahem, “rally,” for the exact date and time the election was being certified, and ending that speech with the words, “We fight. We fight like hell and if you don't fight like hell, you're not going to have a country anymore. So let's walk down Pennsylvania Avenue”—knowing full well he lost the election, and knowing full well that he got KTFOed in every courtroom in the country, is pretty clear incitement. The crowd certainly took it that way, as Capitol police reported multiple law enforcement injuries and requested backup within just a few mins. Within 30 minutes of those remarks, it was a full-scale riot.

 

[Damien Karras]

No but is polices and regulation’s definitely effects the production of oil and long term strategy plans . To act like the president has no influence on gas prices is ignorant. About a year ago Biden took credit when gas went down about 80 cents …

On the subject I think Trump is in real trouble here . All the other stuff not so much

The U.S is much less influential on global oil price fixing than, say, OPEC. Sure he can dip into U.S reserves if the situation gets dire, which it isn't yet, but he himself does not get to set prices neither through the click of a button or with policy. Imagine if the government intervened in price fixing. People would have a fit.

 

[emefer]

It's on Youtube.

Here is a breakdown of everything that had been going on with Fanni and her "Clients". Seems like there is validity to this story. But of course whether you want to believe it or not depends on what your Trump hating level is at.

There’s diddly squat in this.

 

[koquerelle]

On the subject I think Trump is in real trouble here . All the other stuff not so much

That's how I feel too. I wonder why it took so long to get here.

 

[SurferH2O]

Do you think Biden sits in front of a computer and decides what price to put for gas? Is the U.S the only country in the world struggling with the price of oil, energy, and overall inflation?

When a President announces an Energy Policy that includes more Oil and Gas production (Trump), then prices drop. When the opposite happens (Joe Biden), the prices go up. Why?

SPECULATION.

You're welcome.

 

[ShadowRun]

That's how I feel too. I wonder why it took so long to get here.

The timing of it all is suspicious

 

[koquerelle]

The timing of it all is suspicious

I must admit I'm not a fan.

 

[BFoe]

You’re literally just repeating the same CTs that were easily disproven back in 2020.

Like the fact that there were more votes than eligible voters?

There wasn’t. All of that data can easily be seen here, where census.gov has registration and voter turnout info. I’m not sure if this table will have big enough print to be readable here, but here is what it looks like.

Spoiler: Voter info, election 2020

Or that they were literally blocking windows in Detroit with cardboard and wouldn't let Republican poll watchers in?

Also not true. There were poll watchers from all parties there. After Republicans tweeted out “who is available to go to Cobo Hall/sToP tHe StEaL” tweets, a bunch of conservatives turned up to challenge what was happening and a bunch of liberals turned up to oppose them. At one point, both sides had double the number of watchers that was legally allowed. So they—BOTH SIDES—were removed. Other poll watchers from BOTH SIDES remained.

Or in Atlanta there was a "water main break" and they sent everybody home...except democrat counters.

Lol this whole pipe burst/vote dump nonsense has been disproven ages ago. I didn’t know there were people out there that still believed that. You’re a special one.

Or in Philadelphia where Biden was down over 700,000 votes and magically caught up and surpasses Trump?

Nothing “magical” happened here at all. The 700K lead was from in-person votes, while far more people voted for Biden via Mail-In ballot. Here are the numbers from electionreturns.pa.gov. PA’s rules on counting mail in ballots can be found here, and this explains why it takes so damn long.

But all of this stuff was known, and talked about, before Election Night. It was known that Dems took COVID more seriously than Republicans, and Trump specifically told his supporters to not vote mail-in and vote in person instead (because he planned on attacking the mail in ballots later). Don’t believe me that he planned on anttacking them? Here’s Trump in Sept 2020 admitting he was starving the postal service of cash to make processing mail in ballots more difficult. Anyone with a brain knew Trump was likely to be ahead on election night, but lose ground in the days thereafter. None of this is magic or witchcraft lmao.

Then the counting resumed after the republican poll watchers left and Biden got hundreds of thousands of votes in all cases and none for Trump. Statistically impossible.

Trump got 0 Mail In ballots in all cases? Are you sniffing glue?

If you believe 2020 was legit, you're a low iq individual.

I’m sure you’re a Super Genius, and will catch those fraudulent liberals any day now!

 

[BFoe]

That's how I feel too. I wonder why it took so long to get here.

I don’t think it took that long, honestly. These types of investigations can take quite awhile. The Watergate investigation into Nixon was considered quick at 2 years. Mueller investigation also took 2 years. The Whitewater/Lewinsky business with Bill Clinton took 5 years, 9/11 investigation took 2 years, Benghazi took about 2 1/2.

GA’s investigation has taken about 3 years, which is a little bit long maybe but not excessive.

Jack Smith has been fast AF. He took over previous investigations and went from being brand-new to the whole thing, to 2 separate indictments, in like 8 months. That’s expeditious as hell.

edit: GA investigation actually at about 2 1/2 years, it began in Feb 2021. Actually pretty average.

The timing of it all is suspicious

Why? Honest question: when do you feel it should’ve happened?
In the US, we start our election bullshit like a year and a half in advance. With Congress having elections every 2 years, Dems would either be accused of fucking with a presidential election, or trying to damage Trump’s reputation to hurt the candidates he endorsed in the mid-terms, literally any time these charges were brought forth. People are screaming election interference when the election in question is at the end of next year lol. It’s like 15 months away.

Side note: it’s pretty rare to have a Special Counsel investigation going on, and we have 3 right now—and 2 of them are investigating the Bidens.
One of them (Robert Hur) is investigating Joe in regards to his own classified docs business, and the other is David Weiss investigating Hunter.

Can we scream “election interference” too, or is that only for conservatives?