• Xenforo Cloud is upgrading us to version 2.3.8 on Monday February 16th, 2026 at 12:00 AM PST. Expect a temporary downtime during this process. More info here

Elections Trump for POTUS mega thread

Kamalas numbers seem to be dropping. Seems like Trump may win imo
 
Kamalas numbers seem to be dropping. Seems like Trump may win imo
As my buddy said Kamala needs to focus on 2025 and what Trump will do with People's freedoms and their poll numbers started going down when they became cosey with the Cheneys and other right wing figures. She needs to get back on the narrative and stop a round the clock Republican reach out campaign. She needs younger voters and moderate and swing state voters she will not get them with Dick and Liz Ceney. Oh she ahead in most of the swing states other than Arizona and another state.
 
It's too late for Kameltoe.

The die is cast.

Newsom/Whitmer 2028!
laughing-gif.gif
 
Damn the left is absolutely losing it.

Bro, your vice president can't even answer whether Donald won or lost the 2020 election. When you say anybody else is losing it, you lose all credibility.

It's pretty obvious what he thought in 2020 considering all of the shit this chucklefuck has had leaked. If you support putting this giant pussy liar in the White House, then you do you.
 
I have spoken with three Democratic operatives behind the scenes who all believe the race is slipping away from Vice President Kamala Harris. They offer four major reasons why this is happening.

 



That's just 3. It took me less than 5 minutes to find this stuff. Why would you find this hard to believe?
Ron's first claim:
"The union workers weren't union"

I don't know what this is referencing and you didn't provide a link.

Ron's second claim:
"Autoworkers for Trump weren't autoworkers"
A certain % of them were; it's in your link. Care to relay to the board what that % was?

Ron's third claim:
"Firefighters for Trump weren't firefighters"

Okay, the evidence presented is that the IAFF somehow confirmed these people's identities and states they're not members of the IAFF union. If true, it could be these folks are family members of firefighters and are holding the signs in respect to their loved ones' personal endorsements due possibly to union rules against said firefighters' allowance to do so themselves.

Ron's fourth claim:
"People at the Harlem bodega weren't from Harlem"

I don't know if this is true or false you didn't provide a link.

Ron's fifth claim:
"The random customer was a paid RNC operative"

She's a student organizer on college campuses and learned of the appearance a few days earlier, showed up at 9:30 am to wait to see him, and in the AP article states “It’s really disheartening to see that the media makes it seem like we just stumbled into a Chick-fil-A and he bought us milkshakes.” since she was there specifically in hopes of seeing him. No evidence given that she was paid to be there, per Ron's implication. She doesn't control what right wing media spin that as.
 
Well the guy has been grappling with giving either a voice saying he didn't want to show bias but to have only Trump on speaks enough on his behalf.

I hope its true and if it is, its because Elon begged him to I have no doubt. Elon and Joe have become somewhat good friends over the last 3 visits.


It clowns Taylor's endorsement
Yeah he should of course invite both if planning to have Trump on
 
Trump losing his mind answering his bun phone lol.

2024-10-12_21-16-13_5070-png.1066812



Let's see how many MAGA morons buy it lol.
 
Trump now saying it also, as he does another episode of Nelk Boys (has done a few episodes). I always assumed Rogan had some kind of contractual thing where he wouldn’t endorse and/or have trump on


Right on bra
Excited about this.

This is all Elon. And Harris is starting to grate the F out of him.
 
Ron's first claim:
"The union workers weren't union"

I don't know what this is referencing and you didn't provide a link.

Ron's second claim:
"Autoworkers for Trump weren't autoworkers"
A certain % of them were; it's in your link. Care to relay to the board what that % was?

Ron's third claim:
"Firefighters for Trump weren't firefighters"

Okay, the evidence presented is that the IAFF somehow confirmed these people's identities and states they're not members of the IAFF union. If true, it could be these folks are family members of firefighters and are holding the signs in respect to their loved ones' personal endorsements due possibly to union rules against said firefighters' allowance to do so themselves.

Ron's fourth claim:
"People at the Harlem bodega weren't from Harlem"

I don't know if this is true or false you didn't provide a link.

Ron's fifth claim:
"The random customer was a paid RNC operative"

She's a student organizer on college campuses and learned of the appearance a few days earlier, showed up at 9:30 am to wait to see him, and in the AP article states “It’s really disheartening to see that the media makes it seem like we just stumbled into a Chick-fil-A and he bought us milkshakes.” since she was there specifically in hopes of seeing him. No evidence given that she was paid to be there, per Ron's implication. She doesn't control what right wing media spin that as.
I had a feeling all you wanted to do is dispute the claims because you didn't actually believe them. So ok fine, I'll do your homework and provide more information that is readily available because you aren't actually interested in doing the homework yourself.


Here's more information on the staged support from unionized auto workers


CLINTON TWP., Mich. – The Trump re-election campaign paid $20,000 to stage a rally at Drake Enterprises, a non-union parts supplier facility in Michigan, back in September. The rally was seemingly an attempt to curry favor with striking union auto workers after President Biden made history the day before as the first President to walk a picket line. Reporters at the Trump event struggled to find any evidence of auto workers in attendance. In reaction, Michigan AFL-CIO Communications Director Aaron PELO released the following statement:

“Having to pay twenty grand to rent a non-union facility because nobody wanted to host your event is literally so embarrassing. Trump’s whole bit is that he supports blue-collar Americans and wants to protect auto jobs but he couldn’t even find a real auto worker to hold up a rally sign. Scabbing has truly never looked so desperate.”

Also this

Ron's second claim:
"Autoworkers for Trump weren't autoworkers"
A certain % of them were; it's in your link. Care to relay to the board what that % was?
Is a BS take and you know it.

More evidence Trump is a fraud. I'd love to see you pick this stuff apart

hq720.jpg


_132835683_trump_false_image01_976x549-nc.png.webp

truth-social.webp

ai-1.webp

ai-5.webp



 
Last edited:
As my buddy said Kamala needs to focus on 2025 and what Trump will do with People's freedoms and their poll numbers started going down when they became cosey with the Cheneys and other right wing figures. She needs to get back on the narrative and stop a round the clock Republican reach out campaign. She needs younger voters and moderate and swing state voters she will not get them with Dick and Liz Ceney. Oh she ahead in most of the swing states other than Arizona and another state.
So how do you see it playing out in terms of winning?
 
Trump doing JRE is huge for Joe, likely his most viewed episode ever. Not sure how much it helps Trump though. I would suggest most of Joe's audience already supports Trump.

I can't imagine Trump doing JRE is going to flip many votes from Kamala to him. You might get a few non traditional voters, people who never usually vote, on board. But I'd suggest the benefit will be negligible.

I don't want Trump to win, but if I did and I was advising him I'd suggest going on Stephen A's podcast. The venn diagram of Shultz viewers, Theo Von viewers, Nelk viewers and JRE listeners/viewers is almost a complete circle. Alot of black people feel disenfranchised and don't feel Kamala will represent them. Trump would do well extending an olive branch in that direction.

But if I'm being honest, he probably doesn't need to. It appears he will win anyways.
 
Trump doing JRE is huge for Joe, likely his most viewed episode ever. Not sure how much it helps Trump though. I would suggest most of Joe's audience already supports Trump.

I can't imagine Trump doing JRE is going to flip many votes from Kamala to him. You might get a few non traditional voters, people who never usually vote, on board. But I'd suggest the benefit will be negligible.

I don't want Trump to win, but if I did and I was advising him I'd suggest going on Stephen A's podcast. The venn diagram of Shultz viewers, Theo Von viewers, Nelk viewers and JRE listeners/viewers is almost a complete circle. Alot of black people feel disenfranchised and don't feel Kamala will represent them. Trump would do well extending an olive branch in that direction.

But if I'm being honest, he probably doesn't need to. It appears he will win anyways.
Is it really huge for Joe? He's already turned down Trump in the past.

People already know who Trump is, so I don't know what new voters he would be attracting. If anything, I think going on Joe's show would either have a neutral or a negative effect on him. He'd say something stupid or wild in a 2-3 hour situation that would get clipped and spread.
Kamala has the higher risk and reward for doing shows like this, imo. She's the one that needs to prove herself and show who she is.
 
Back
Top