In fairness, there is an engineer here who thinks 2% of 600 is 2 so .......I mean, he is the president. Engineers should listen.
Would you rather have stealth or fly a badass SR71?How about we poll the F35 pilots. Would they rather have stealth, or have their plane look cool?
Would you rather have stealth or fly a badass SR71?
The SR-71 has stealth techWould you rather have stealth or fly a badass SR71?
What does that have to do with fighter jets?
Double engines so we can charge more when we sell it to our Arab allies. Something something 5d chess.
The new Chinese 6th gen jet has 3 engines so 2 engines is old news.
The f22 is a twin engine too. Is there a way you can blame Trump for that?
Lolol he just went on a rant about single engine planes not being pretty enough. If you want to defend that then I feel terrible for you.The new Chinese 6th gen jet has 3 engines so 2 engines is old news.
The f22 is a twin engine too. Is there a way you can blame Trump for that?
Just want to known if responding with 8647 to anything is ok.What does that have to do with fighter jets?
"I'm not a yuge believer in stealth, cuz stealth is basically, a lot of it's the designed into shape, and [unintelligible], I'm, I'm ya know, and I'm sure you maybe, think, but also if, if, if, that's the case they're gonna figure it out pretty fast, I think, so you're gonna design an ugly plane for stealth reasons and then six months later they're gonna figure out this and then you're stuck with a plane now."
He's gonna redesign the F-35 into the F-55 with a simple upgrade with two engines instead of one because he doesn't like single engines.
I'm not cliffing beyond that, it's short.
![]()
Lolol he just went on a rant about single engine planes not being pretty enough. If you want to defend that then I feel terrible for you.
What's 8647?
Who is outraged? I loathe Dump you half-assed human.@Natural Order
Are we pretending 86 means something more than it does and that 8646 wasn't a thing?
Give us your fake outrage. Don't be scared homie