Trump crying about Stephen Curry... lol

Um, that God seemingly does not know that there are sextillions of stars, and he told someone their progeny would number that many......

Address all the other points I brought forth. I'm waiting, and again, I'll probably get some of your cowardly goal post moving and seeming inability to address my points......

This is very likely the most retarded thing I've ever read on Sherdog. There's no way you're older than 16.
 

I'm just saying there are always religious threads open that you could have those debates. We're in a Donald Trump/Stephan Curry thread lol.

Maybe you could start a thread about Christian/Biblical hypocrisy and inconsistencies and really duke it out?
 
eh? Stephen Curry is a brother though. He aint mixed like you.
And? It aint about what you are. It's about what you look like. He already gets criticized for being light skinned. I'm just calling it like i see it.
 
Lol, good. Steph curry will now find himself in shit territory where he ain't dark enough to be a brotha, but ain't white enough for the white people. Wise decision, stephen.

Damn, you took this shit to the gutter with a quickness. That's a shameful ass post.
 
So I've had plenty of answers for this topic. Just none that would satisfy you. I'm not surprised. Which one shall we go to next? Make a claim or argument

I dont need to make a claim, my position is not making the positive claim, yours is. Address any number of the points I brought forth. Pick one, or them all. If the book is so right and true, it should not be hard for you to explain how mammals existed before reptiles, say.....
 
I dont need to make a claim, my position is not making the positive claim, yours is. Address any number of the points I brought forth. Pick one, or them all. If the book is so right and true, it should not be hard for you to explain how mammals existed before reptiles, say.....

A negative claim must still be proven... but that is beside the point.

Where does the Bible claim mammals were created before reptiles?
 
A negative claim must still be proven... but that is beside the point.

Where does the Bible claim mammals were created before reptiles?

1:21 And God created great whales, and every living creature that moveth, which the waters brought forthabundantly, after their kind, and every winged fowl after his kind: and God saw that it was good.

1:24 And God said, Let the earth bring forth the living creature after his kind, cattle, and creeping thing, and beast of the earth after his kind: and it was so.

At the extreme least, you can say that God created all animals at the same time, which is absurd, and wrong.

Or how about God giving people the stars for signs? Astrology is a delusion, but I guess it's a delusion God partakes in, yeah?
 
Cool critique, full of substance.

I actually hate when people make comments like the one I made, so I understand your response, but your post was the equivalent of someone arguing that dogs can't look up. I assume the problem isn't that you're retarded, just that you're probably young. I was young on these boards once and said stupid shit so I'm not hating, but I'm also not gonna engage.

In short, anyone who has ever taken a literature class wouldn't say what you said, which means you are probably 14, maybe 16 at most in a shit school district.
 
I actually hate when people make comments like the one I made, so I understand your response, but your post was the equivalent of someone arguing that dogs can't look up. I assume the problem isn't that you're retarded, just that you're probably young. I was young on these boards once and said stupid shit so I'm not hating, but I'm also not gonna engage.

In short, anyone who has ever taken a literature class wouldn't say what you said, which means you are probably 14, maybe 16 at most in a shit school district.

I operate on the belief that only fools make haughty presumptions.
 
1:21 And God created great whales, and every living creature that moveth, which the waters brought forthabundantly, after their kind, and every winged fowl after his kind: and God saw that it was good.

1:24 And God said, Let the earth bring forth the living creature after his kind, cattle, and creeping thing, and beast of the earth after his kind: and it was so.

At the extreme least, you can say that God created all animals at the same time, which is absurd, and wrong.

Or how about God giving people the stars for signs? Astrology is a delusion, but I guess it's a delusion God partakes in, yeah?

The Hebrew doesn't say whale it says sea creature.
 
I operate on the belief that only fools make haughty presumptions.

If you're not a teenager, then go take a literature class. The things you're arguing honestly don't make sense, dude, and no one here is going to be able to explain it to you. It's not that I disagree with you or that I think you're wrong, it's that your argument is genuinely nonsensical.
 
The Hebrew doesn't say whale it says sea creature.

King James version says whales. Still, more questions remain. What was God supposedly referencing when he says sea creature? One would think whales. I'll grant that God was talking about something other than whales, like a Kraken or something. He still creates birds before all creeping creatures, which would presumably include lizards, which 1:25 says. God seemed to have gotten this wrong.

God also believes in astrology. God, perfect in all ways, is wrong.
 
If you're not a teenager, then go take a literature class. The things you're arguing honestly don't make sense, dude, and no one here is going to be able to explain it to you. It's not that I disagree with you or that I think you're wrong, it's that your argument is genuinely nonsensical.

Convenient for you, that you need not actually explain what was wrong with my post. Also, if I was unable to articulate my point, an English language class would be far more pertinent compared to a literature class in my view.
 
Convenient for you, that you need not actually explain what was wrong with my post. Also, if I was unable to articulate my point, an English language class would be far more pertinent compared to a literature class in my view.

The problem isn't linguistic, it's conceptual. You don't understand figurative language or how to analyze a text. A literature class would better cover those.
 
2u9r509.jpg
 
King James version says whales. Still, more questions remain. What was God supposedly referencing when he says sea creature? One would think whales. I'll grant that God was talking about something other than whales, like a Kraken or something. He still creates birds before all creeping creatures, which would presumably include lizards, which 1:25 says. God seemed to have gotten this wrong.

God also believes in astrology. God, perfect in all ways, is wrong.

King James didn't write the Bible. Prove birds weren't created before reptiles...

You keep trying to slip in more then 1 point at a time as if you're afraid of details. What's the rush? I thought you wanted me to address each point?
 
King James didn't write the Bible. Prove birds weren't created before reptiles...

You keep trying to slip in more then 1 point at a time as if you're afraid of details. What's the rush? I thought you wanted me to address each point?

We have mountains of scientific, genetic and geological proof that mammals came millions of years after reptiles. But no, I'm the close minded one.

Surely you are capable of addressing two points at once, right?

Why does god believe in astrology? Surely he's not that stupid, right?
 
Back
Top