International Trump Admin accidentally leaks Yemeni war plans....

So you're saying that the Afghanistan withdrawal is basically 9/11 or the Holocaust?

Did you think before you typed that?


"So you're saying..." is the phrase that precedes a straw man argument.

<DisgustingHHH>
 
Bullshit. That's playing scared. They will always latch on to something. Form an attack plan. Carry it out with deadly intention.
So you think it is good and proper to call it a war plan when only congress can declare war... there is no war... and you know the magats will only focus on and refute that, and that is all most of the magats will see done? you see it is "playing scared" to be accurate, in the age of disinformation, we live in??

If you think so then you are part of the problem imo.

Yes they will all seize something but FORCE them to seize a lie, and not something actually true.

Why is saying it is a 'battle plan' not enough? Do you believe it simply does not have the impact a "War plan does" or is it because Trump was pushed as an 'anti war' candidate and you want to 'get him on that'?

Stretching the meaning of 'war' to say any armed response = war is just silly and wrong. Call it a 'battle plan' ffs as that is what it is and deny the right that one avenue to say 'they are exaggerating because they know if they told the truth it would not get enough outrage'.
 
So you think it is good and proper to call it a war plan when only congress can declare war... there is no war... and you know the magats will only focus on and refute that, and that is all most of the magats will see done? you see it is "playing scared" to be accurate, in the age of disinformation, we live in??

If you think so then you are part of the problem imo.

Yes they will all seize something but FORCE them to seize a lie, and not something actually true.

Why is saying it is a 'battle plan' not enough? Do you believe it simply does not have the impact a "War plan does" or is it because Trump was pushed as an 'anti war' candidate and you want to 'get him on that'?

Stretching the meaning of 'war' to say any armed response = war is just silly and wrong. Call it a 'battle plan' ffs as that is what it is and deny the right that one avenue to say 'they are exaggerating because they know if they told the truth it would not get enough outrage'.
I am saying that the right will latch on to anything and something like the difference between saying "war plan" and "attack" or "battle" plan is not a difference. In that context it meant an armed attack and everyone with a brain understands that.

In your opinion the left should be on the defensive before they even attack, and that's bullshit. That's not how you win anything. Have a plan. Stick to it. Never let the enemy dictate what you do.
 
Well now that our Zionist overlords are mad we'll get accountability now.

<{hughesimpress}>
Oh, but there's nothing important in the Signal messages so why would they be upset????? That;s what I was told.
While this fuck up by the Trump top Admin officials is massive and should lead to the firing of more than one of them, it also shows how completely inept the Medi and much of the left is.

If the Media and Left do not realize by now, that even citing a person middle initial of their name incorrectly will see the magat media machine use that to spin and refocus the argument on that error, as being the critical thing and a 'deliberate attempt by the fake news and left to spin this up as more than it is', then at this point we need to write off the media and left as simply not up to the task.

Calling this what it was 'Battle Plans' is enough to get rightful out rage on. No need to try and upscale it to 'War Plans' when that requires a declared war and gives the right ammo to say 'if they thought Battle Plans was bad they would just say it'.

So maybe some will say 'it was just a mistake by the left to label it that way', which is not forgivable. this is a mistake that absolutely can and should be eliminated by simply fact checking the information you are about to put out. The very process of 'fact checking' is to eliminate this type of mistake.
I will admit, I've come across several headlines that are overly sensationalized and taken seriously. Even thing that Trump says "now they'll hear that and run with it" and sure enough people do. It makes the cause look bad.
Yeah... one guy, Mike Walz, or his assistant screwed up on the invite (we think). That's it. No one else did anything wrong.

OMG! Fire them all!!!!!! SO INCOMPETENT!!! RAWR! It's almost like the Democrats have nothing else going on for them.
The motherfucking top spy, CIA director was in the chat. Is not knowing who's in the group acceptable for the head of the CIA? And all his "oh I don't recall, I can't remember details". Do you think it's acceptable for high ranking government personnel to be that braindead in the positions they're in? Good god man.
 
While MAGA tries to deflect the argument with "the information wasn't classified", which it was, it's convenient they don't bring up the fact that whether it was classified, highly sensitive, top mission critical, whatever term you wish to use to describe the chat log, it was on an app that's designed to have the messages deleted so there would be no record or log.

That in itself is a CRIME. Pam Blondi where you at DEI (DOJ) hire.
 
Elon should develop an alternative to Signal, purpose built for the government. Highly secure, preserves records for government/legal reasons, etc.
 
Elon should develop an alternative to Signal, purpose built for the government. Highly secure, preserves records for government/legal reasons, etc.
If there's one thing I want is more Elon Musk personally benefiting from his buddy role in government. FAA, telecommunications, space flight, secure messaging,. Let's just make him the sole government contractor and he can supply the whole country with anything we need!
 
Sorry but if you don't have panic attacks over Rachel Ziegler or Trannies, you are on the left according to the MAGA playbook.
It’s especially funny because most of us agree with some policies here, and some policies there, and very rarely (probably never) does any single politician or party overwhelmingly represent a persons real viewpoint. But with Trump, he and his cohorts are so incompetent, that, even if you agree with the politics, they still suck at the job so badly it’s almost impossible to support them unless you’re a sycophant or a moron or an internet dweeb trying to win an argument.
 
It’s especially funny because most of us agree with some policies here, and some policies there, and very rarely (probably never) does any single politician or party overwhelmingly represent a persons real viewpoint. But with Trump, he and his cohorts are so incompetent, that, even if you agree with the politics, they still suck at the job so badly it’s almost impossible to support them unless you’re a sycophant or a moron or an internet dweeb trying to win an argument.



It's a cult lol
 
It’s especially funny because most of us agree with some policies here, and some policies there, and very rarely (probably never) does any single politician or party overwhelmingly represent a persons real viewpoint. But with Trump, he and his cohorts are so incompetent, that, even if you agree with the politics, they still suck at the job so badly it’s almost impossible to support them unless you’re a sycophant or a moron or an internet dweeb trying to win an argument.

Yeah, I really think the republican party is dead though for sometime. It had an opening in 2024 to scoot back into the realm of normalcy but it chose Trump.
 
Elon should develop an alternative to Signal, purpose built for the government. Highly secure, preserves records for government/legal reasons, etc.
Those plans of another communication apparatus are next to the ketamine and the 12 kids Musk has.
 
Back
Top