To Lock out, or Not to Lock Out...

Should you lock out every rep on Bench?

  • Yes.

    Votes: 3 60.0%
  • No.

    Votes: 2 40.0%

  • Total voters
    5

KnightTemplar

Green Goblin Belt
Double Yellow Card
Joined
Feb 10, 2009
Messages
60,662
Reaction score
50,789
...That is the question. ;)

This refers specifically to the Bench Press. I've heard Bodybuilders say they don't lock out on the Bench in order to keep tension on the muscles throughout the movement. And thus increase Hypertrophy. At the other end of the Bell Curve, Powerlifters have to practice locking out their Bench Press, because that's a vital part of competing.

But for a Fighter who's just Benching as part of GPP, or even the Average Joe who lifts for fun, which is the best approach?
 
while i probably fit your target demo
im not training a sport specific lift but i bench for the nums

in my mind not getting the lockout = not getting the lift

that being said i have been trying some non lock out stuff with accessory lifts

so my opinon is to actually bench you should have a lock out.. but there are so many things you can do with the bench you can really get a lot out of doing non lock out stuff too

so i tried this the other day and i loved it after cooking myself on the bench
i did a superset of skullcrusher/jm to the throat and cgbp to the mid chest. both done without a lockout except for the last rep. i only put 30kg for the workout but my triceps were screaming after each set especially that last lock out is brutal
i got it from this dr.mike/snitcharrd collab
 

Before it was about "time under tension", it was to prevent "damage" to your joints.

Just finish the rep and do more overall quality repetitions. Best of both worlds.
10 reps with no lockout vs 12 reps with a lockout, because you get a 0.5-1 second rest between reps. Either way you will get the desired outcome.
Only one option includes actual full reps of the exercise.
 
In regards to potential injury, as long as you're in full control of the weights, I don't think you need to worry about hyperextension with lockouts.

I do think not locking out does increase time under tension on your muscles. How much more effective is it? Who really knows. It's like asking how much will partials and isometric holds will help
 
I would approach it as a variation of a main lift. Why not just do a block of training with it for variety?

Partials and isometric holds have their place.

I was watching a video of Dr Mike and he claims partials can produce better results (hypertrophy specifically)than full ROM. I remember he had one video on lower 2/3 ROM for calf raises.
 
Last edited:
As someone who doesn't have full range of motion in one of my elbows from "keeping constant tension," I say lock out. Range of motion is like anything else. If you don't use it, you lose it
 


@KnightTemplar ive finally discovered what's going on here. You cross reference every YouTube short of training advice with Sherdog. I'm gonna give you a hint. Mike Israetel is smarter than we are.
 
Back
Top