No. Let them fight.First off, I'm against standing fighters up for being unable to get up from bottom. You shouldn't reward someone's inability to get up from bottom.
Secondly, if the guy on bottom isn't doing anything (Lewis vs. Almeida), it should be called a TKO for the top guy.
Now, I think this has to literally mean doing nothing... like Lewis sleeping on bottom. The bottom guy basically has to be so exhausted, they aren't transitioning, they aren't trying to get up, and it should be over a long stretch of time like 30 seconds, and the ref. should give multiple warnings for them to move before the TKO stoppage comes.
I think this will solve issues of a lot of lay and prays, and force the bottom guy to take risks to get up or get finished.
Trolling used to be funny.First off, I'm against standing fighters up for being unable to get up from bottom. You shouldn't reward someone's inability to get up from bottom.
Secondly, if the guy on bottom isn't doing anything (Lewis vs. Almeida), it should be called a TKO for the top guy.
Now, I think this has to literally mean doing nothing... like Lewis sleeping on bottom. The bottom guy basically has to be so exhausted, they aren't transitioning, they aren't trying to get up, and it should be over a long stretch of time like 30 seconds, and the ref. should give multiple warnings for them to move before the TKO stoppage comes.
I think this will solve issues of a lot of lay and prays, and force the bottom guy to take risks to get up or get finished.
Goddard should've stepped in and stood them up at least once or twice during all that LnP. He kept telling Almeida to get busy, but never really did anything about it. I feel like there are waves in the UFC (probably due to consistent changes) that influence the refs to let them stay in the dominant position for a period of years, then it goes to stand them up after a minute of no activity, then back to let them LnP. Also there are some refs that are quick to stand up and others that just let the fight commence regardless of what's happening. But no, there should not ever be a TKO awarded due to top control... that will hurt the sport. Maybe time to start bringing in those yellow/red cards.
What is the guy on top doing to bring an end to a fight? Is he trying to submit his opponent? Is he trying to make him tap to strikes? Make it so he isn’t able to intelligently defend himself? Put him out cold? No? Then no, the guy on bottom feeling like he doesn’t have to even attempt anything in order to stay out of danger shouldn’t lose then and there. And I think they should stand them up too if nothing is happeningFirst off, I'm against standing fighters up for being unable to get up from bottom. You shouldn't reward someone's inability to get up from bottom.
Secondly, if the guy on bottom isn't doing anything (Lewis vs. Almeida), it should be called a TKO for the top guy.
Now, I think this has to literally mean doing nothing... like Lewis sleeping on bottom. The bottom guy basically has to be so exhausted, they aren't transitioning, they aren't trying to get up, and it should be over a long stretch of time like 30 seconds, and the ref. should give multiple warnings for them to move before the TKO stoppage comes.
I think this will solve issues of a lot of lay and prays, and force the bottom guy to take risks to get up or get finished.
Control time is only vaguely mentioned in the scoring criteria. Both effective striking and effective grappling is talked about in terms of attempting to bring an end to the fight. If someone isn’t attempting to finish the fight and is content to sit there and do nothing, it should be stood upStanding someone up cuz the other person is pinned doesn't make sense.
Control time is only vaguely mentioned in the scoring criteria. Both effective striking and effective grappling is talked about in terms of attempting to bring an end to the fight. If someone isn’t attempting to finish the fight and is content to sit there and do nothing, it should be stood up
John Finches ... aware me who is John Finches?Almost all of Jon Finches opponents were active on the ground, so he'd never win via them falling asleep and not moving.
If a fighter isn’t doing anything to his opponent it should be stood up. There’s no attempt to end the fight whatsoeverSo if a fighter is incapacitated, cannot move or stand up, cannot escape and is essentially being exhausted by his opponent you believe the proper thing the referee should do is give him standing neutral position?
No lmao This isn't Bloodsport. If it's stalling from Guard sure. Half guard - Maybe. Side control on - No.