Tito continues to make strides as a public servant in Huntington Beach

After all the hearings and bullshit I've seen as of late it really looks like these things are literally popularity contest and any idiot with a following can get elected

It’s always been the case, your just now seeing it...;)
 
Hahahahahahahahaahahaha...
Hahahahahahaahahabahahahahahahaahahahaabahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha...

hahahhahah

Im done.
 
the worst part of all this is the left wing opened the door for the right wingers to start cancelling shit. Now us normal folk are basically surrounded by whiney spoiled pukes on either side
It was shocking.. at the capitol riot there were neckbeards and stupid boomers.

I was like damn.. they really are the low IQ and the scum of society.

I was like.. can they even understand the documents that they were taking pictures of. Holy Moley.
 
LOL Tito being a politician is so funny and so 2020/2021
74864d0a7920067de6c47dc22d2eb670.gif
 
I don't understand why this cry baby is having such a whinge about masks, I get it they suck but it's not some grand conspiracy to control the population, wearing masks sucks and if you don't want to wear a mask I understand it but if someone or a business wants to be courteous you should respect that and move on, instead of continually bitching about it like a selfish mongoloid....ironic that these Tito types are the first one to cry snowflake but continually moan about wearing a mask in a middle of a global pandemic.
These masks aren't condoms dude, they don't protect you from shit. Not the cloth ones anyway, which are what most people wear. There is a correlation because people are less likely to interact or sneeze at each other while they're muzzled, but not causality. Meaning, the cloth doesn't actually filter out less than 1 micron, which is all a virus needs. So yeah, I get complying with a business service policy to put customers at ease but some people don't like to be muzzled knowing that the "protection" thing is wonky at best, and a control mechanism at worst.
 
It was shocking.. at the capitol riot there were neckbeards and stupid boomers.

I was like damn.. they really are the low IQ and the scum of society.

I was like.. can they even understand the documents that they were taking pictures of. Holy Moley.
I think his post sailed right over your head cuckster.
 
These masks aren't condoms dude, they don't protect you from shit. Not the cloth ones anyway, which are what most people wear. There is a correlation because people are less likely to interact or sneeze at each other while they're muzzled, but not causality. Meaning, the cloth doesn't actually filter out less than 1 micron, which is all a virus needs. So yeah, I get complying with a business service policy to put customers at ease but some people don't like to be muzzled knowing that the "protection" thing is wonky at best, and a control mechanism at worst.
glad to know you’re a microbiologist. Please refer to video of individual performing test of spraying droplet of gas through cloth and disposable mask.

COVID-19 is dispersed via aerosol ie. dispersion of water droplets through the air. Even a cloth mask would filter some of the droplets because it is another barrier.

If your argument holds true, then Tito Ortiz is a potential vector. He has probably interacted with people with cloth masks.

Justifying non mask wearing because it is not 100% is a fallacy in itself.

Correlation “can” indicate relationship when taking into consideration a combination of confounding factors.
 
Last edited:
And still some sherturds side with this mongoloid. It's not about protecting yourselves narcissistic cunts.
<{clintugh}>
 
These masks aren't condoms dude, they don't protect you from shit. Not the cloth ones anyway, which are what most people wear. There is a correlation because people are less likely to interact or sneeze at each other while they're muzzled, but not causality. Meaning, the cloth doesn't actually filter out less than 1 micron, which is all a virus needs. So yeah, I get complying with a business service policy to put customers at ease but some people don't like to be muzzled knowing that the "protection" thing is wonky at best, and a control mechanism at worst.

Garbage, they're not going to prevent you getting it but they certainly help, it all adds up, most medical experts would agree. If citizens in the U.S like Tito would stop bickering and arguing about trivial bullshit to flex their own political agenda and just showed a little bit more respect and courtesy for each other and put their diffrences aside, they wouldn't be in this mess.
 
These masks aren't condoms dude, they don't protect you from shit. Not the cloth ones anyway, which are what most people wear. There is a correlation because people are less likely to interact or sneeze at each other while they're muzzled, but not causality. Meaning, the cloth doesn't actually filter out less than 1 micron, which is all a virus needs. So yeah, I get complying with a business service policy to put customers at ease but some people don't like to be muzzled knowing that the "protection" thing is wonky at best, and a control mechanism at worst.

https://files.fast.ai/papers/masks_lit_review.pdf

"Research focused on aerosol exposure has found all types of masks are at least somewhat effective at protecting the wearer. Van der Sande et al (33) found that "all types of masks reduced aerosol exposure, relatively stable over time, unaffected by duration of wear or type of activity", and concluded that "any type of general mask use is likely to decrease viral exposure and infection risk on a population level, despite imperfect fit and imperfect adherence". Overall however, analysis of particle filtration is likely to underestimate the effectiveness of masks, since the fraction of particles that are emitted as aerosol (vs. droplet) is quite small (26). Analysis of seasonal coronavirus compared to rhinovirus (30) suggests that filtration of COVID-19 may be much more effective, especially for source control.

The available evidence suggests that near-universal adoption of non-medical masks when out in public, in combination with complementary public health measures could successfully reduce effective-R to below 1.0, thereby stopping community spread. Economic analysis suggests that the impact of mask wearing could be thousands of US dollars saved per person per mask"


So basically, you don't know what you are talking aabout.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top