- Joined
- Mar 4, 2014
- Messages
- 73,848
- Reaction score
- 130,252
This is what it looks like when 5 people are crammed in there
Yeah the traditional explanation is that a ship can carry a boat but not vice versa.Coast guard cutters are 65ft or longer (referred to as ships) usually commanded by officers but in the USCG some of the smaller ones have Senior Enlisted Officer in charges. Navy only has Commissioned Officer COs
Boats are sharter than 65 feet. In the USCG have a Coxswain in charge that is generally enlisted E3 (rarely) and above, navy boats will sometimes have a boat officer directing the coxswain...the USCG coxswaibs are better trained and don't let Os run our smallboats...
A ship can carry a boat, your boat driver's do the fun stuff....
It's wild that he clearly cut corners and did this way cheaper than he should have yet he was willing to go down with it almost every time.
probably because he simply didn't want to PAY someone else to pilot the boat!!! RESULT!! saved himself the salary of a submersible pilot.It's wild that he clearly cut corners and did this way cheaper than he should have yet he was willing to go down with it almost every time.
There’s also the possibility the the oxygen tanks sprang a leak on the initial decent and that everyone ran out of oxygen then.Or they could already be out of air.
I imagine they've been panicking for a good long while at this point.
Just finished the interview, and it wasn't exactly as informative I was hoping it'd be, from an 'expert.'
Good point <Lmaoo>probalby because he simply didn't want to PAY someone else to pilot the boat!!! RESULT!! saved himself the salary of a submersible pilot.
- that'll be it.
This whole misguided design and build and operatrion of this sub was about MONEY and not a tiny bit about SAFETY.
@Sara
Oh god.... you got to hear this for yourself guys...
At 8:40 - "the way the CEO runs his company is unique. He's on record saying he could have hired 50-year old white guys that were experts - former military guys - but he didn't think that would be 'inspirational.' So he decided to hire 26 year olds."
The Coast Guard expert continues - "I'd rather have the expert from an age standpoint. I don't care what their skin color is. I don't care what gender they are or any of that stuff. I want those who are most qualified if they're designing something I'm going down 13,000 feet in I want to know I'm going to be safe."
"So there definitely is some questions related to this CEO."
Yeah the traditional explanation is that a ship can carry a boat but not vice versa.
I posted this YT video awhile back. A ship leans towards the starboard side when taking a portside turn - i.e. when turning left, it will lean right. A boat leans to the portside when making a portside turn - i.e. when turning right, it will lean right.
Audio of the Submarine CEO's crazy quote about hiring 'inspirational employees'.
@2:20
still have located the vessel yet?
Would be crazy if later we found out that someone like his business partners sabotaged it so the CEO would die and someone else takes his position, cash or even company
Fixed that for youWould be crazy if later we found out that someone like his business partners sabotaged it so the CEO would die and someone gets VIP Blink182 tickets
He literally bragged about this.
"You know, at some point, safety is just pure waste," Rush told CBS' David Pogue during an episode of his "Unsung Science" podcast. "I mean, if you just want to be safe, don't get out of bed, don't get in your car, don't do anything. At some point, you're going to take some risk, and it really is a risk-reward question."
"The reporter also found that the company seemingly made use of "off-the-shelf components" such as a cheap video game controller, for its submarine."
https://futurism.com/the-byte/titanic-submarine-ceo-safety-waste
I may not have 250k to splurge on thrill seeking but I got out of bed, stopped for an ice coffee and sitting in a nice comfy chair at work.
yep i posted about that in this thread yesterday evening.Watch that same clip at @6:07.
Some insane shit.
There is "thrill seeking" and there is just being dumb and ill-informed. Why would you go in a can (with1 button for up and down and no actual seats), down to the depths of the ocean? Coast Guard doesn't even have equipment capable of getting down there and you are going to trust some random person?
https://nypost.com/2023/06/20/last-text-of-british-billionaire-in-missing-titanic-sub-revealed/
I like this quote: "While the Coast Guard has no submarine capable of reaching those depths, officials are working around the clock to make sure such a vessel is ready if and when the Titan sub is located."
In other words "We are working around the clock to make sure a vessel that doesn't exists is ready in case we need it.....but you know.....the vessel doesn't actually exist....soooooooo."