Tim Kennedy post ala Tito

You're shifting the goalposts. The foul wasn't witnessed by the referee. Fouls go unwitnessed without repercussions all the time. Your logic is that two wrongs make a right; that's a terrible argument. The referee was keenly aware of what was happening on the stool and allowed it to happen. It's not a like-for-like comparison. Also once you start name calling it's clear that you're fueled by emotions.

If the fight had been stopped when Romero didn't answer the bell (like it should have), then they could have made the case that the foul led to the stoppage and it could have been turned into a no contest.

My argument has nothing to do with the foul; it's only about how the situation on the stool was handled. If there was no foul from Kennedy, and the stool situation still happened, would you change your position on how the stool situation played out? If your answer is no, then you agree that you foul is irrelevant.

Yes, I am aware that your argument is completely nonsensical and I've explained why.

I cannot help you see basic reason. The only emotion I feel is genuine amazement that a person can be this committed to a plainly illogical argument.
 
I remember somewhat recently I saw a clip of him trashing guys for stolen valor, the he was exposed for stealing valor, and his response was that he doesn’t think it’s a big deal. Guy is an idiot.
Was it just their word though or did they have any sort of evidence?

Nobody likes or respects those guys. It was a hit piece for clicks which didn’t really seem to work.
I've heard this too (never cared to watch it) but am not sure either way

Watching the Anti-Hero podcast with a real Delta Force Operator, that gives Tim a ton of credit for everything he did during his time. He gives him shit for the stupid stuff he did, like throwing a grenade into a window and killing civilians. But then just drags him for all of the bullshit he claimed. And then when Tim tried to say it wasn't true, they brought on guys that served with Tim, on the missions he wrote about, and they all gave their side of what actually happened.


In the end, Tim is full of shit. Most of his social media stories, are bullshit. His heroics stories always involve people who are dead, and cant refute it. And when he's asked about those people, he forgets their names. When they were talking about the war crimes he bragged about committing, so much shit in his book they just shook their head and said none of that shit would ever happen. He would never drive through a village with two M4's, one in each hand shooting anyone who looked in their direction... To see so many fellow Green Berets, and actual DF operators say he's full of shit, a terrible teammate, and was just an all around liar was satisfying because I always got that vibe from him.
Ok that's more to go on.

Isn't it possible though he spilled too many embarrassing beans and these guys have been told to dispute some of what he's said?
 
Yes, I am aware that your argument is completely nonsensical and I've explained why.

I cannot help you see basic reason. The only emotion I feel is genuine amazement that a person can be this committed to a plainly illogical argument.

You ignored my question. If there was no foul would your position on how the stool situation was handled be the same? Or would it change?

If your position would be the same, then the foul is irrelevant; you are saying the stool situation was handled correctly regardless of the foul. If your position would change, then your argument is that the stool situation was dealt with correctly because of the foul (two wrongs make a right).

At least be clear about what we’re disagreeing about. My argument is that the stool situation was mishandled regardless of a prior foul. I’ve been consistent about that. I even gave the stipulation that there is a case for changing the result to a no-contest after the fact based on the foul.
 
The referee didn't see the foul. That sucks, but it makes it irrelevant to what happened after that. There is no retroactive recourse for the foul of holding the glove.

Not answering the bell is a TKO, and the rules were not handled correctly in this fight. Romero wasn't standing and ready to go when the bell sounded; he was sitting and currently unable to continue.

John McCarthy who notoriously never admits he was wrong even said "I wish I had the forethought to envision this exact situation before it ever occurred and that way I may have handled it differently." That's as much of an admission that he handled it incorrectly as you will ever get from McCarthy.

*I wish I had the forethought to envision this exact situation before it ever occurred and that way I may have handled it differently.

But you are not stating facts about what occurred. Yoel was told to stay seated by the NSAC Inspector. The truth is the Cutman hired and paid for by the UFC did not re-enter the cage when summoned to do so and that is what held up the start of the 3rd round. It is not Yoel’s fault that this occurred and the Cutman is not part of Yoel’s official corner*
 
Was it just their word though or did they have any sort of evidence?


I've heard this too (never cared to watch it) but am not sure either way


Ok that's more to go on.

Isn't it possible though he spilled too many embarrassing beans and these guys have been told to dispute some of what he's said?
I mean the stories he tells are just outrageous. The mission he was on had over 200 vehicles that were traveling to resupply an outpost. He claimed the Afghani drivers were stabbing gas tanks with screw drivers to ruin vehicles, they were making phone calls with phones they hid trying to set up ambushes. The guys on the mission with him said none of that happened. He claimed that after the first night (it was like a two week trip I think they said?) everyone had ran completely dry, they were out of ammo, grenades, nobody had anything left.... they were a supply convoy, they had hundreds of thousands of rounds of ammo. He said he was using a night vision scopes, and thermals looking for people pretending to be dead, shooting bodies with what ammo had left, and then went out stabbing bodies to make sure they were dead hunting for ammo. There has been 18-20 people that were either on the mission with him, or who were green berets for over a decade that said the stories he told were so outlandish they'd be taken out of movies because nobody would buy it. Like, he's bragging about committing war crimes. The US Military I believe even had to release a statement about it because he said they drove through villages shooting any military age male that looked up from the ground while they were driving through. He told a story about having 50 hand grenades in a backpack, and halfway through the first day of the mission, he had used every single one of them. His ground force commander made a comment that he didn't know if he threw 50 grenades on missions in his entire 20+ years of active service career combined. At one point he said he got bored at the outpost, and borrowed a rifle that the American military doesn't use, got it from some Canadian snipers. Went up into a tower and shot 25 people with it in one afternoon. The US military had no record of any confirmed kills from someone shooting out of those towers at the villages near by. He said he went up there alone, no spotter, no one helping him call misses for him. First time shooting the gun, shot 25 guys before dinner.
 
If you want a good laugh look up Brent Tucker on YouTube. He calls out Tims book on all of his lies which includes Kennedy's former team members
They had like 3 episodes on it, and every time they brought in more people to dispute everything Tim said and it just got worse and worse for Tim.
 
Back
Top