International Thousands of Afghans relocated to UK under secret scheme after data leak



Look at Sweden being up there as well. I wonder why all these numbers have rapidly increased the last decade or so?

And if you go out on the street and ask women who are they most afraid of getting raped by they will all answer white men. Because that's the PC answer. I'm not even sure if a white woman gets gang raped by migrants that she would change her tune.

I wonder about those things sometimes. There was a family here that took in a migrant boy of around 15yo a few years back and they early on left him alone with their 7yo daughter. Which they found out later that he had raped repeatedly.

I really do wonder if that even made them change their minds in any way.
 
Look at Sweden being up there as well. I wonder why all these numbers have rapidly increased the last decade or so?

And if you go out on the street and ask women who are they most afraid of getting raped by they will all answer white men. Because that's the PC answer. I'm not even sure if a white woman gets gang raped by migrants that she would change her tune.

I wonder about those things sometimes. There was a family here that took in a migrant boy of around 15yo a few years back and they early on left him alone with their 7yo daughter. Which they found out later that he had raped repeatedly.

I really do wonder if that even made them change their minds in any way.
To be fair, I’ve certainly noticed a switch up in how women feel about open borders.

Even the crazy bitter types have changed - although (as with everything) they’ll never acknowledge they were wrong, they don’t seem too vocal about it anymore.

There was a similar trend with trannies, whereby women would always appear to support males being in their safe spaces, but spoke their true mind once it was safe to do so.
 
To be fair, I’ve certainly noticed a switch up in how women feel about open borders.

Even the crazy bitter types have changed - although (as with everything) they’ll never acknowledge they were wrong, they don’t seem too vocal about it anymore.

There was a similar trend with trannies, whereby women would always appear to support males being in their safe spaces, but spoke their true mind once it was safe to do so.

I foresee a future in about 15-20 years where there will be a bunch of middle-aged to older white women extremely vocal about the problems with immigration and migrants.

And you will KNOW for SURE that those same women were on the other side of the fence being just as loud over there when it was all going down. And more importantly, always voting in favour of it.

No shame, no responsibility.
 
These people served our military effort as guides and translators at the risk of their and their families safety, the very least that we could do is look after them.
 
This is so, so fucking dodgy it's unreal. If it wasn't dodgy, why keep it a secret? This is treason.
 
Went to school with a couple of Afghanis

One asked me to steal from Walmart and the other stole my car
 
These people served our military effort as guides and translators at the risk of their and their families safety, the very least that we could do is look after them.

Are you going to invite some to live in your house then?

We should never had anything to do with that country, I don't want to pay for Tony Blair's bad decisions for the rest of my life. We paid them for the work they did at the time and we spent 20 years bolstering their military, it's not my fault they crumbled 2 weeks after we cut the cord.
 
Are you going to invite some to live in your house then?

We should never had anything to do with that country, I don't want to pay for Tony Blair's bad decisions for the rest of my life. We paid them for the work they did at the time and we spent 20 years bolstering their military, it's not my fault they crumbled 2 weeks after we cut the cord.
Exactly.

What is this weird fixation in the West about punishing your own country?

Some (not 150,000 of them) provided a service - knowing the risk - and were paid accordingly. We don’t now owe a debt to them and their very extended family for eternity.

And much of the list is made up of individuals who applied for asylum citing fear of the Taliban, that doesn’t mean they worked for the British Army.
 
Look at Sweden being up there as well. I wonder why all these numbers have rapidly increased the last decade or so?

And if you go out on the street and ask women who are they most afraid of getting raped by they will all answer white men. Because that's the PC answer. I'm not even sure if a white woman gets gang raped by migrants that she would change her tune.

I wonder about those things sometimes. There was a family here that took in a migrant boy of around 15yo a few years back and they early on left him alone with their 7yo daughter. Which they found out later that he had raped repeatedly.

I really do wonder if that even made them change their minds in any way.
It is one of life's mysteries.
 
Are you going to invite some to live in your house then?

We should never had anything to do with that country, I don't want to pay for Tony Blair's bad decisions for the rest of my life. We paid them for the work they did at the time and we spent 20 years bolstering their military, it's not my fault they crumbled 2 weeks after we cut the cord.
I preface this with I have nothing against you as a person, I think you've been corrupted by some unsanitary ideas that can largely be traced back to Zionists and our ruling class.

Why would I invite anyone who isn't my family into my house? Sorry dude that's a retarded question, I'm sure you heard it from some people you respect but it logically doesn't hold up.

The state, The United Kingdom employed these people to help prosecute a war against their people. The state has an obligation to them for the consequences of that employment beyond the period of employ.

In exactly the same way the United Kingdom is responsible for the way it's veterans are treated when they stop being useful. It's not for charities to step up by taxing poor people's compassion to pay for their treatment. In the same way it's not my job to house a migrant.

In both cases these are usually poorly educated people taken advantage of by the state.

You are parroting the propaganda of wealthy individuals behind all of it in the first place.

It is our collective responsibility, as a state, for the decisions of the state, that's democracy, that's the system you live under. It doesn't matter if you agree with what Blair agreed to, WE elected him. WE can make sure foreign powers don't have our country in their pockets by electing people that are demonstrably (through consistent voting record) against foreign influence. People like Jeremy Corbyn. Painted an anti semite, terrorist sympathiser and Russian shill precisely because of the threat that he and those like him demonstrate to the status quo.

Honour, chivalry and moral fortitude require that you make sacrifices. There are times, like this where you have to do something unpalatable to put right what someone else put wrong. This is what being a player character requires.
 
I preface this with I have nothing against you as a person, I think you've been corrupted by some unsanitary ideas that can largely be traced back to Zionists and our ruling class.

Why would I invite anyone who isn't my family into my house? Sorry dude that's a retarded question, I'm sure you heard it from some people you respect but it logically doesn't hold up.

The state, The United Kingdom employed these people to help prosecute a war against their people. The state has an obligation to them for the consequences of that employment beyond the period of employ.

In exactly the same way the United Kingdom is responsible for the way it's veterans are treated when they stop being useful. It's not for charities to step up by taxing poor people's compassion to pay for their treatment. In the same way it's not my job to house a migrant.

In both cases these are usually poorly educated people taken advantage of by the state.

You are parroting the propaganda of wealthy individuals behind all of it in the first place.

It is our collective responsibility, as a state, for the decisions of the state, that's democracy, that's the system you live under. It doesn't matter if you agree with what Blair agreed to, WE elected him. WE can make sure foreign powers don't have our country in their pockets by electing people that are demonstrably (through consistent voting record) against foreign influence. People like Jeremy Corbyn. Painted an anti semite, terrorist sympathiser and Russian shill precisely because of the threat that he and those like him demonstrate to the status quo.

Honour, chivalry and moral fortitude require that you make sacrifices. There are times, like this where you have to do something unpalatable to put right what someone else put wrong. This is what being a player character requires.
Either you just read mein kampf and really enjoyed it, or you had grok make your post for you <cruzshake>
 
Either you just read mein kampf and really enjoyed it, or you had grok make your post for you <cruzshake>


yeah because Nazi sympathisers regularly say good things about well-known Socialist Jeremy Corbyn, its something you notice about them
 
1024px-London_ethnic_demographics_from_1961_to_2021.gif
 
The state, The United Kingdom employed these people to help prosecute a war against their people. The state has an obligation to them for the consequences of that employment beyond the period of employ.
So basically, the govt can use whomever they wish, and then any negative consequences as a result of this so-called obligation to them can be borne by the people?

I'm sure governments LOVE that apparent social agreement that not one single non-governmental person ever was told about or agreed to - govt can go to war all they want (another thing no one asked for) and we can suck it up and watch our quality of life melt away before out eyes.

Cool
 
These people served our military effort as guides and translators at the risk of their and their families safety, the very least that we could do is look after them.

All of them? lol...

Not likely. Not even close

And did you just shit out the phrase "corrupted by some unsanitary ideas that can largely be traced back to Zionists"

Holy lol, talk about racist

No one can deny the massive negative consequences of allowing unchecked mass immigration from 3rd world countries into Europe. Though public officials keep trying to put a lid on how bad it is.

No one ever discusses... What makes these countries complete shitholes? And won't these people bring these same problems with them?

Are they going to suddenly transform from radical muslims who have massive people's rights issues into well behaved civilized westerners?
 
To be fair, I’ve certainly noticed a switch up in how women feel about open borders.

Even the crazy bitter types have changed - although (as with everything) they’ll never acknowledge they were wrong, they don’t seem too vocal about it anymore.

There was a similar trend with trannies, whereby women would always appear to support males being in their safe spaces, but spoke their true mind once it was safe to do so.
Women aren't really as hardlined in their beliefs like men are. They are attention seeking by nature and so are their opinions.
I preface this with I have nothing against you as a person, I think you've been corrupted by some unsanitary ideas that can largely be traced back to Zionists and our ruling class.

Why would I invite anyone who isn't my family into my house? Sorry dude that's a retarded question, I'm sure you heard it from some people you respect but it logically doesn't hold up.

The state, The United Kingdom employed these people to help prosecute a war against their people. The state has an obligation to them for the consequences of that employment beyond the period of employ.

In exactly the same way the United Kingdom is responsible for the way it's veterans are treated when they stop being useful. It's not for charities to step up by taxing poor people's compassion to pay for their treatment. In the same way it's not my job to house a migrant.

In both cases these are usually poorly educated people taken advantage of by the state.

You are parroting the propaganda of wealthy individuals behind all of it in the first place.

It is our collective responsibility, as a state, for the decisions of the state, that's democracy, that's the system you live under. It doesn't matter if you agree with what Blair agreed to, WE elected him. WE can make sure foreign powers don't have our country in their pockets by electing people that are demonstrably (through consistent voting record) against foreign influence. People like Jeremy Corbyn. Painted an anti semite, terrorist sympathiser and Russian shill precisely because of the threat that he and those like him demonstrate to the status quo.

Honour, chivalry and moral fortitude require that you make sacrifices. There are times, like this where you have to do something unpalatable to put right what someone else put wrong. This is what being a player character requires.
Brilliant, instead of holding the government responsible for its failures, let the citizens pick up the bill. What's next having native brits serve the sentences of the criminal afghans for them ?
 
Women aren't really as hardlined in their beliefs like men are. They are attention seeking by nature and so are their opinions.

Brilliant, instead of holding the government responsible for its failures, let the citizens pick up the bill. What's next having native brits serve the sentences of the criminal afghans for them ?


I don't think I'd go so far as attention seeking but women do seem far too easily led by their biological nature to be mothering and caring. It's easy to tug on their heart strings and get them to vote for things that don't seem realistic on paper or in practice.

One other thing mind.

The women that seem the most vocal about it (see any refugees welcome protest) are not, largely, attractive. They aren't likely to be accosted by even the most desperate refugee sex offender. I'm sure its happened a couple times but on the whole I'd imagine the rapists ate targeting the more attractive women.

I always wonder with any form of activism, how much of it is based on revenge. The ugly lefty women voting for and supporting this stuff wishing bad things to happen to the hot girl in school who bullied them.

I mean, the rapists who are apparently triggered by scantily clad women who were "asking for it" are highly unlikely to be targeting a they/them queer woman with short hair, rolls of fat and dressed in manly looking clothes.
 
I don't think I'd go so far as attention seeking but women do seem far too easily led by their biological nature to be mothering and caring. It's easy to tug on their heart strings and get them to vote for things that don't seem realistic on paper or in practice.

One other thing mind.

The women that seem the most vocal about it (see any refugees welcome protest) are not, largely, attractive. They aren't likely to be accosted by even the most desperate refugee sex offender. I'm sure its happened a couple times but on the whole I'd imagine the rapists ate targeting the more attractive women.

I always wonder with any form of activism, how much of it is based on revenge. The ugly lefty women voting for and supporting this stuff wishing bad things to happen to the hot girl in school who bullied them.

I mean, the rapists who are apparently triggered by scantily clad women who were "asking for it" are highly unlikely to be targeting a they/them queer woman with short hair, rolls of fat and dressed in manly looking clothes.
I've noticed this too.

It's mostly women who have either directly or indirectly had their heart broken by white men, who tend to screech the loudest about embracing fake asylum seekers.

There's plenty of American studies which show that women stop being fruit loops politically once they become mothers. I think that's why JD Vance has hinted at wanting to only allow parents to vote, presumably by that he means he wouldn't let motherless females vote.
 
I've noticed this too.

It's mostly women who have either directly or indirectly had their heart broken by white men, who tend to screech the loudest about embracing fake asylum seekers.

There's plenty of American studies which show that women stop being fruit loops politically once they become mothers. I think that's why JD Vance has hinted at wanting to only allow parents to vote, presumably by that he means he wouldn't let motherless females vote.


I'd imagine becoming a parent makes more aware of danger impending and wanting to "conserve" the most important thing to you. Most of these women are not parents and never intend to be. It does make some sense.
 
Back
Top