- Joined
- Nov 26, 2009
- Messages
- 6,494
- Reaction score
- 0
I agree. I prefer sea-level and explosive as terms more than this ABCDEFGH-shizzle.
Okay. Just wondering because he is Stephan Neal who defeated Brock Lesnar in a NCAA Wrestling match and went on to play for the Patriots while winning several Superbowl rings.
When you talk about looks, do you refer to how big the muscle of a man is or how defined he is muscular wise?
I talk about neither, I'm talking about his proportions and build. Many people criticize guys let's say for not having huge arms and big biceps (seems the reason why people say NBA players are A-level athlete, that and their height), when in reality the guy could have a good waist, good shoulder, huge back and strong torso which results in a lot of power, but since he doesn't have that bodybuilding look people will discredit him. As I said, look matters, but not everyone understand which look matters.
I talk about neither, I'm talking about his proportions and build. Many people criticize guys let's say for not having huge arms and big biceps (seems the reason why people say NBA players are A-level athlete, that and their height), when in reality the guy could have a good waist, good shoulder, huge back and strong torso which results in a lot of power, but since he doesn't have that bodybuilding look people will discredit him. As I said, look matters, but not everyone understand which look matters.
Googled "A Level Athlete". Brought me to Sherdog.
Googled "A Level Athlete". Brought me to Sherdog.
What if look (read : shape) wasn't the problem? What if look was actually a great way to understand a fighter, but the reason people keep saying Lebron is an A-level athlete and some MMA fighters is because they believe that his look is the best?
I'm sorry, but look is really important, and no, being tall with big biceps isn't the greatest physic ever.
Look at Jon Jones legs and try to tell me its his weak side.
Why does the shadow on the ground not show 4 plates on the bar?