- Joined
- Mar 5, 2018
- Messages
- 651
- Reaction score
- 0
Stipe may very well beat Cormier at UFC 226. Hell, there's a good chance he may KO him in the 1st round, but this thread is not about their fight as a whole.
I've heard this idea that Stipe has elite TDD repeated extensively both on Sherdog and on social media, but where is the proof of this? Stipe has NEVER fought an elite wrestler in the UFC and got taken down by Gonzaga twice, who's not even close to being an elite wrestler. He managed to get back to his feet after these takedowns but DC has better top control than Gonzaga so if he gets takedowns, he'd be able to hold him down for longer periods of time.
And then when I question them about it, they say something along the lines of "hey bro, did you see what he did to Ngannou? Stipe was a D1 wrestler bro, he'll stuff DC's takedowns easily and smash him."
Anybody even moderately knowledgeable about the sport knows that amateur wrestling credentials mean very little in terms of MMA wrestling, and that being a good offensive wrestler ≠ having good TDD.
Cases in point (two of many):
- Hendo's TDD
Dan Henderson was one of the most accomplished amateur wrestlers to ever compete in MMA, but had very mediocre takedown defense for most of his career. He was repeatedly taken down and held down by far less credentialed, smaller guys, e.g. Jake Shields.
- D1 vs D3
The D1 wrestling argument is poor and is not rooted in facts. Corey Anderson recently outwrestled, outworked, and flat out dominated Patrick Cummins. Anderson was an average D3 wrestler while Cummins was an elite D1 All-American, and an NCAA championship runner-up (he even beat Cormier in college).
Wouldn't be surprised at all if Stipe wins and actually proves to have excellent TDD, but those of you that seem to be supremely confident RIGHT NOW in his ability to defend takedowns are not thinking logically, but are rather using broscience to formulate your opinion.
I've heard this idea that Stipe has elite TDD repeated extensively both on Sherdog and on social media, but where is the proof of this? Stipe has NEVER fought an elite wrestler in the UFC and got taken down by Gonzaga twice, who's not even close to being an elite wrestler. He managed to get back to his feet after these takedowns but DC has better top control than Gonzaga so if he gets takedowns, he'd be able to hold him down for longer periods of time.
And then when I question them about it, they say something along the lines of "hey bro, did you see what he did to Ngannou? Stipe was a D1 wrestler bro, he'll stuff DC's takedowns easily and smash him."
Anybody even moderately knowledgeable about the sport knows that amateur wrestling credentials mean very little in terms of MMA wrestling, and that being a good offensive wrestler ≠ having good TDD.
Cases in point (two of many):
- Hendo's TDD
Dan Henderson was one of the most accomplished amateur wrestlers to ever compete in MMA, but had very mediocre takedown defense for most of his career. He was repeatedly taken down and held down by far less credentialed, smaller guys, e.g. Jake Shields.
- D1 vs D3
The D1 wrestling argument is poor and is not rooted in facts. Corey Anderson recently outwrestled, outworked, and flat out dominated Patrick Cummins. Anderson was an average D3 wrestler while Cummins was an elite D1 All-American, and an NCAA championship runner-up (he even beat Cormier in college).
Wouldn't be surprised at all if Stipe wins and actually proves to have excellent TDD, but those of you that seem to be supremely confident RIGHT NOW in his ability to defend takedowns are not thinking logically, but are rather using broscience to formulate your opinion.