- Joined
- Jan 26, 2005
- Messages
- 17,272
- Reaction score
- 7,668
biased journalismhis Saturday former NFL defensive end Greg Hardy — a man once convicted of assaulting his ex-girlfriend —
no mention of charges being dropped
biased journalismhis Saturday former NFL defensive end Greg Hardy — a man once convicted of assaulting his ex-girlfriend —
do these idiots want the man to not have a job so he wanders the streets committing more crimes? Ostracizing criminals from society is probably a good way to keep them in the spiral of crime.
so what do they want? Greg Hardy to become a homeless person or a criminal? let the man make a living, sure, he's a scumbag, but so is Chris Brown and nobody is bitching to Interscope Records about him choking Rihanna.
MMA fighters are nearly four times more likely to be arrested for domestic violence than NFL players. But UFC does not want to talk about the issue.
his Saturday former NFL defensive end Greg Hardy — a man once convicted of assaulting his ex-girlfriend — will make his official UFC debut. To add to the controversy, Hardy is scheduled to compete on the same fight card as Rachel Ostovich, who suffered a broken orbital bone during an alleged attack by her husband.
The UFC’s willingness to promote Hardy on a variety of their platforms, including their highly anticipated debut on ESPN+, highlights the gaping inconsistencies in their domestic violence policies.
In the wake of NFL running back Ray Rice assaulting his fiancée in 2014, UFC president Dana White took a strong stance against domestic violence: “There’s one thing that you never bounce back from and that’s putting your hands on a woman. Been that way in the UFC since we started here. You don’t bounce back from putting your hands on a woman.”
By December 2018, White’s stance on domestic violence had dramatically changed from his zero-tolerance approach.
In an attempt to stifle journalists from asking further questions about Hardy, the promotion shielded the fighter from fight-week media obligations. The UFC took this decision despite Hardy’s place in the co-main event. When it comes to domestic violence, it appears that UFC thinks silence is golden.
UFC did not respond to a request for comment on this story.
https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2019/jan/17/greg-hardy-ufc-domestic-violence-rachel-ostovich
The first is that he never paid for his crime.
The second is that hes never really shown contrition
And the third is that people tend to consider entertainment jobs as more of a privilege as compared to "normal" jobs. And it is true that certain transgressions can, and should, get you blackballed from certain fields. In this case it seems, to me at least, is that domestic abuse should be one such transgression for athletes in contact sports.
Ngannou vs Hardy ... the battle of A-level athleteswait hardy is co main??
damnnnn
also journalist saying this is stupid i want to see him fight to see him LOSE
NGANNOU vs HARDY 2021 he will KO hardy
some jus dont get it .....
I think this piece is more about the hypocrisy of the ufc calling out the nfl and claiming that they don’t let that shit slide and then this shitdo these idiots want the man to not have a job so he wanders the streets committing more crimes? Ostracizing criminals from society is probably a good way to keep them in the spiral of crime.
lol nobody is saying he doesn't deserve a chance. The issue is that the UFC doesn't want to talk about it and is shielding a headliner from the media.What greg he did is a scumbag move and real bottom of the barrel stuff but people deserve a second chance- to an extent.
Don’t you have a wall to fund Nancy?MMA fighters are nearly four times more likely to be arrested for domestic violence than NFL players. But UFC does not want to talk about the issue.
his Saturday former NFL defensive end Greg Hardy — a man once convicted of assaulting his ex-girlfriend — will make his official UFC debut. To add to the controversy, Hardy is scheduled to compete on the same fight card as Rachel Ostovich, who suffered a broken orbital bone during an alleged attack by her husband.
The UFC’s willingness to promote Hardy on a variety of their platforms, including their highly anticipated debut on ESPN+, highlights the gaping inconsistencies in their domestic violence policies.
In the wake of NFL running back Ray Rice assaulting his fiancée in 2014, UFC president Dana White took a strong stance against domestic violence: “There’s one thing that you never bounce back from and that’s putting your hands on a woman. Been that way in the UFC since we started here. You don’t bounce back from putting your hands on a woman.”
By December 2018, White’s stance on domestic violence had dramatically changed from his zero-tolerance approach.
In an attempt to stifle journalists from asking further questions about Hardy, the promotion shielded the fighter from fight-week media obligations. The UFC took this decision despite Hardy’s place in the co-main event. When it comes to domestic violence, it appears that UFC thinks silence is golden.
UFC did not respond to a request for comment on this story.
https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2019/jan/17/greg-hardy-ufc-domestic-violence-rachel-ostovich
I guess if you’re the president of said ‘violence factory’ you shouldn’t spout off about how your company won’t stand for that stuff then.Who cares? Cage fighting has always had the undesirables in society involved from the beginning.
Don't pipe up now when you've looked down on it for so long as if it's some leader in morality.
Next they'll be like "violence factory" ufc history with trump etc...
To your first point o feel like people conflate somethingReasonable points but she chose to take a pay off didn't she? So he hasn't done time but he has paid for it.
He plead not guilty too didn't he so it's hard to show contrition if you 'claim' not to have done it.
Money > some women getting smacked about a bit. If the consumers don't care then why should the employers.
I hope he gets ktfo and gets cut but that's not happening in this fight. I have no real desire to watch him fight but I probably won't turn the tv off so I will watch it.
This is major issue with backgrounds checks. It prevents people from working after a person serves whatever punishment the court saw fit. If you're not gonna give a person a chance to reassimilate to society then let everyone know from the start it's one strike and you're out.do these idiots want the man to not have a job so he wanders the streets committing more crimes? Ostracizing criminals from society is probably a good way to keep them in the spiral of crime.
Do you as a mma fan care though? Arnt we more curiouse about what technical improvements a high level nfl athelete can make to become a force at the very shallow UFC he division? The more i read sherdog, the more I think sherbros is turning into social justice warriors caring more about personal life and morals than technique and preformance...I’m happy that there are journalists who are being vocal about this issue, instead of toeing the party line or ignoring it altogether.
That would require them to have been given a chance in the first place.he offers black folks second chances...has the Guardian?
It should be looked at as more of a hitting someone who is half your size, or like an athlete beating up a math nerd. It should still be frowned upon and treated as assault in the eyes of the law.Maybe he believed the feminist message that men and women were equal.
If you think about it, it should be considered sexist to not hit a woman.
Yes but I think the inconsistencies in the UFC's BS morality is what irks people. They act like they care about domestic violence to appease idiots and then they promote this guy on the main event. Thats the part people react to. If the UFC didn't blatantly say stupid sht like that to create a perception, then no one would care.Do you as a mma fan care though? Arnt we more curiouse about what technical improvements a high level nfl athelete can make to become a force at the very shallow UFC he division? The more i read sherdog, the more I think sherbros is turning into social justice warriors caring more about personal life and morals than technique and preformance...
great point^Why are we comparing MMA fighters to NFL players. If we're going to blame Dana for this shouldn't it be UFC to NFL?
What makes an MMA fighter? Having one mma fight in a casino in the middle of nowhere? Lots of pieces of shit have a couple of cage fights for fun. What if we compare MMA fighters to anyone who's ever played pickup football, how do the numbers look then?
No doubt the lower echelon of cage fighting attracts people who are prone to violence, but I don't know what that has to do with the UFC.
That said Greg Hardy is likely a piece of shit and Dana puts money above morals every time.