- Joined
- Aug 17, 2018
- Messages
- 43,573
- Reaction score
- 95,735
It's a very sad state of affairs. Unfortunately, not much is going to change.
No answers for CO2? You've heard of trees right?
We do have a solution. We've had a solution for 50 years. Had we acted then we wouldn't have any issue now at all.Yeah, how's that working out so far? This is a comforting thought, but it's not a solution.
Trees had a 370 million year head start on combustion based energy and gave it up in like 200 years.
Each adult tree consumes 48 lbs of carbon per year. Each year humanity produces an estimated 88,184,904,873,951 lbs (40 billion tons) of CO2. So we just need to wave a magic wand and produce 1.8 trillion additional adult trees and it'll all be fixed up. For reference if an adult tree requires about 20'x20' of space that's 25,826,446 square miles. That's more of less the entire land mass of Africa and Asia.
That's not to say we shouldn't be planting more. We should be. It's just not a solution. It's not even part of one because we don't have one yet.
We do have a solution. We've had a solution for 50 years. Had we acted then we wouldn't have any issue now at all.
I agree we should definitely plant more trees but that alone won't fix anything. I'm replying to "It's just not a solution. It's not even part of one because we don't have one yet."I have no idea what you mean by this.
Trees and oceans capture 40% of the excess CO2 caused by fossil fuel emissions. They absolutely should be part of the solution.Yeah, how's that working out so far? This is a comforting thought, but it's not a solution.
Trees had a 370 million year head start on combustion based energy and gave it up in like 200 years.
Each adult tree consumes 48 lbs of carbon per year. Each year humanity produces an estimated 88,184,904,873,951 lbs (40 billion tons) of CO2. So we just need to wave a magic wand and produce 1.8 trillion additional adult trees and it'll all be fixed up. For reference if an adult tree requires about 20'x20' of space that's 25,826,446 square miles. That's more of less the entire land mass of Africa and Asia.
That's not to say we shouldn't be planting more. We should be. It's just not a solution. It's not even part of one because we don't have one yet.
But recycling makes me feel good.Why does the list of the worst plastic polluting countries in the world look exactly like the list of the countries which the west sends nearly all of it's "recycled" plastic?
If you live in the west and want to make sure your plastic doesn't end up in the ocean, throw it in the regular trash so it goes to a landfill in the your country, and not on a barge bound for an southeast Asian country that is most likely going to just dump it in a river.
Trees and oceans capture 40% of the excess CO2 caused by fossil fuel emissions. They absolutely should be part of the solution.