- Joined
- Jul 19, 2012
- Messages
- 9,279
- Reaction score
- 0
The War Room Bet Thread
- Thread starter Lead
- Start date
- Status
- Joined
- Jul 20, 2015
- Messages
- 20,464
- Reaction score
- 19
Just read through the thread. Not surprising Jack is being a weasel again.
Oh and look, he called me a troll again. A troll that thoroughly embarrassed him.
http://forums.sherdog.com/threads/why-wont-jack-v-savage-tell-the-truth-a-single-time.3452341/page-8
- Joined
- Jul 28, 2010
- Messages
- 81,367
- Reaction score
- 68,579
You'll notice that Jack's the only one constantly being asked by the mod to sign off on the bet, since it began.
Quite telling...
- Joined
- Oct 30, 2004
- Messages
- 95,962
- Reaction score
- 35,164
Huh?
What you can do to stop looking like a hackish weasel is accept the bet. Either the original one or your new version with the simple condition.
- Joined
- Jul 20, 2015
- Messages
- 20,464
- Reaction score
- 19
literally his own words: "Like I said, a thorough auditing will find less than 3,000 illegal votes--probably way less. Do you agree or disagree?"
Then again, we're talking to someone who thinks Hillary isn't corrupt. From what I've seen he's used to taking dumb, easy bets and he quickly came to the realization that this one was silly.
"probably way less than 3000 illegal votes"
- Joined
- Jul 28, 2010
- Messages
- 81,367
- Reaction score
- 68,579
There is no "new version" you idiot. The original version...which YOU proposed, is there for everyone to see.
- Joined
- Oct 30, 2004
- Messages
- 95,962
- Reaction score
- 35,164
Yep. So you want to bet that more than 3,000 unauthorized citizens voted?
Remember, Trump's wildly dishonest claim was that it was 3 million to 5 million. You know that he's as dishonest as his fanboys in the WR, which is why you're unwilling to make that bet.
- Joined
- Jul 20, 2015
- Messages
- 20,464
- Reaction score
- 19
"Like I said, a thorough auditing will find less than 3,000 illegal votes--probably way less. Do you agree or disagree?"
- Joined
- Jul 20, 2015
- Messages
- 20,464
- Reaction score
- 19
@HereticBD
Doesn't this bet basically stem from this anyway?
What else could "people that voted illegally" mean besides.... people that voted illegally? It's not just limited to illegal immigrants. Jack is getting really confused because the word "illegal" comes up twice.
Doesn't this bet basically stem from this anyway?
What else could "people that voted illegally" mean besides.... people that voted illegally? It's not just limited to illegal immigrants. Jack is getting really confused because the word "illegal" comes up twice.
- Joined
- Jul 28, 2010
- Messages
- 81,367
- Reaction score
- 68,579
Nice try. "Illegal votes". That was the bet.
Give me rest. You have regularly claimed that the number of "3000 illegal votes" is laughable. Even after the whole "felon" thing was thrown in there, you still claimed that it would be less than 3000. What the fuck are you afraid of? Do you value your sig that much? Are you that pathetic?
Oh' wait, let me answer that for you. Yes. Yes you are.
- Joined
- Oct 30, 2004
- Messages
- 95,962
- Reaction score
- 35,164
Yeah, "illegals" voting. You know this, as it's clear within the context of the thread. Neither of us even thought about felons until another poster brought it up. I don't know who you think you're fooling.
Hmm. If you believe what you're saying and you think my sig is so valuable to me and you also genuinely don't realize that Trump was lying, it would seem like taking either the original bet or my other offer up would be a no-brainer. And yet...
- Joined
- Jul 20, 2015
- Messages
- 20,464
- Reaction score
- 19
But that's not what you said.
"Like I said, a thorough auditing will find less than 3,000 illegal votes--probably way less. Do you agree or disagree?"
- Joined
- Jul 28, 2010
- Messages
- 81,367
- Reaction score
- 68,579
That's nice and all. However, I signed off on the bet before it was even brought up. To argue that I'm using it against you is just sad.
"Illegal votes". Not "Illegals", or "Unauthorized Citizens". "ILLEGAL VOTES". Your words. Not mine.
You're a very special kind of coward.
- Joined
- Oct 30, 2004
- Messages
- 95,962
- Reaction score
- 35,164
Says the guy who refuses to take the original bet or to just admit that Trump is lying so we can move on to a different one.
- Joined
- Jul 28, 2010
- Messages
- 81,367
- Reaction score
- 68,579
I've accepted the original bet multiple times.
You have no integrity or honor. Not even on the smallest level, such as a sig bet. Shameful.
- Joined
- Oct 30, 2004
- Messages
- 95,962
- Reaction score
- 35,164
My integrity and honor speaks for itself. And my offer stands whenever you're ready to grow a pair/stop being such a hack that you can't admit that Trump is lying even when everyone knows it.
- Joined
- Jul 28, 2010
- Messages
- 81,367
- Reaction score
- 68,579
It sure does...
Your condition for accepting the bet YOU PROPOSED are desperate.
Let me ask you this:
Why won't you accept the bet without that? Oh' that's right, because you know you'll lose the bet, and need something to balance out that devastating, suicidal thought inducing loss.
When the numbers come out, we'll know if he was lying or not. If the numbers came out and it was lower than what you were willing to bet on, you wouldn't even need my words. The proof would be right there. I'm not going to say it before any numbers come out, just to appease you though. That's ridiculous. You can just stop asking for that condition to be met, because it's not going to happen.
- Joined
- Jul 28, 2010
- Messages
- 81,367
- Reaction score
- 68,579
- Status
