The War Room Bet Thread V5

[Lead]

I think he meant a positive or relatively less-negative PV percent margin (@The Diplomat, this means if he loses the PV, it's by a lower margin than he lost it by in 2016) as opposed to a lower or positive raw-vote differential. As turnout will be higher, using the raw number is favorable to me so I'm fine with it, but whichever way @Tropodan prefers is OK. With that clarification, I accept.

So -2.1%?

 

[Jack V Savage]

So -2.1%?

That's my understanding. Either way is fine for me.

 

[Lead]

Got it. @Tropodan, I can edit popular vote to the margin instead of count if you want. If not, just quote and okay it.

 

[Deleted member 457759]

Got it. @Tropodan, I can edit popular vote to the margin instead of count if you want. If not, just quote and okay it.

Roger that!

I'm good to go with whatever.

 

[Lead]

That's my understanding. Either way is fine for me.

Roger that!

I'm good to go with whatever.

You both seem good with either but I don’t want to elect which option that should be. I can do either one (popular vote or popular vote margin)

 

[Jack V Savage]

You both seem good with either but I don’t want to elect which option that should be. I can do either one (popular vote or popular vote margin)

Your initial one is fine. Seems like that's what he's agreeing to.

 

[Lead]

@Tropodan v. @Jack V Savage
1. Donald Trump will have a better margin with both the electoral vote (77+) and popular vote (-2,868,686) in the 2020 presidential election compared to the 2016 presidential election.
2. @Tropodan - For, @Jack V Savage - Against
3. 11/3/2020 (tentative)
4. Avatar bet
5. 2 months


Quote and give an okay for it to be officiated.

Also, feel free to check my math there on the popular vote.

I think he meant a positive or relatively less-negative PV percent margin (@The Diplomat, this means if he loses the PV, it's by a lower margin than he lost it by in 2016) as opposed to a lower or positive raw-vote differential. As turnout will be higher, using the raw number is favorable to me so I'm fine with it, but whichever way @Tropodan prefers is OK. With that clarification, I accept.

So -2.1%?

That's my understanding. Either way is fine for me.

Got it. @Tropodan, I can edit popular vote to the margin instead of count if you want. If not, just quote and okay it.

Roger that!

I'm good to go with whatever.

You both seem good with either but I don’t want to elect which option that should be. I can do either one (popular vote or popular vote margin)

Your initial one is fine. Seems like that's what he's agreeing to.

It’s official. Thanks

 

[Lead]

#51. @HockeyBjj v. @kpt018
1. Donald Trump will have a 3rd SCOTUS nominee confirmed by the Senate
2. @kpt018- for, @HockeyBjj- against
3. Tentatively on or before 01/20/2020
4. Avatar bet
5. 1 month
6a. If Trump wins the 2020 general election and a nominee hasn't been confirmed, the bet is null.
6b. The punishment will not overlap with the punishment for the WR fantasy football league and will be served after that one is satisfied, if necessary.
Winner: kpt018

 

[Limbo Pete]

#51. @HockeyBjj v. @kpt018
1. Donald Trump will have a 3rd SCOTUS nominee confirmed by the Senate
2. @kpt018- for, @HockeyBjj- against
3. Tentatively on or before 01/20/2020
4. Avatar bet
5. 1 month
6a. If Trump wins the 2020 general election and a nominee hasn't been confirmed, the bet is null.
6b. The punishment will not overlap with the punishment for the WR fantasy football league and will be served after that one is satisfied, if necessary.
Winner: kpt018

Well, here we are
RIP our civil liberties

 

[HockeyBjj]

Amy confirmed. What’s the damage @kpt018? I just request nothing lewd.

@Lead you can call this one. I wrongly thought the same Senators as last time would oppose and they’d find 1 more with the shockingly near election implications

aw. Didn’t see you already posted it

 

[Limbo Pete]

I wrongly thought the same Senators as last time would oppose and they’d find 1 more with the shockingly near election implications

Betting on the GOP to have a sense of decency and restraint when they are looking at the prospect of an almost guaranteed win for every single court case they want for the foreseeable future? Not a good wager, bud.

 

[Fawlty]

Grats to @kpt018 for the only thing good to come out of Mitch's most corrupt clusterfuck yet: Pustule-Strength Bannon as @HockeyBjj's av punishment. Magnifico.

 

[HockeyBjj]

Grats to @kpt018 for the only thing good to come out of Mitch's most corrupt clusterfuck yet: Pustule-Strength Bannon as @HockeyBjj's av punishment. Magnifico.

At least all of you have to look at it too

 

[kpt018]

Grats to @kpt018 for the only thing good to come out of Mitch's most corrupt clusterfuck yet: Pustule-Strength Bannon as @HockeyBjj's av punishment. Magnifico.

I was laughing as I picked it out but we have a group chat for the WR fantasy football league and I have to see that disgusting thing regulaly. I’m regretting it already.

 

[andnowweknow]

@bobgeese

Third call out. Your stupid stimulus stipulation isn't happening. Stop being a bitch.

Biden wins by 5 million or more votes in the popular vote count.

PS

I love you

 

[bobgeese]

@bobgeese

Third call out. Your stupid stimulus stipulation isn't happening. Stop being a bitch.

Biden wins by 5 million or more votes in the popular vote count.

PS

I love you

The goose has no second check. Trump loses.

it is known.

 

[andnowweknow]

The goose has no second check. Trump loses.

it is known.

Bet me irl.

 

[bobgeese]

Bet me irl.

I am HORRIBLE at gambling. I don’t know how anyone enjoys it.

I’m too cheap.

 

[andnowweknow]

I am HORRIBLE at gambling. I don’t know how anyone enjoys it.

I’m too cheap.

 

[bobgeese]

Now that I excel at!!!