- Joined
- Jan 17, 2010
- Messages
- 9,570
- Reaction score
- 12,174
- What's your guys opinions of this?
Every societ trades a little or much of their freedom, since the dawn of societs as we know, in old Rome they had the *vigiles (in modern world, having a camera registering all our movements 24/7), so as a city or contrie grows numeraly and economicaly, the first thing to develop is the crime, only them, there will be investiment on security. Police is a very important pillar of living in a societ, even other animals have their own type of policing, like shepherd dogs taking care of sheeps, or a animal that keeps his sight on the babis of their species. Is a natural and "simple" way of protection.
The thing is living in a more secure societ has a trade off of some freedoms, you get a Loss prevention officer following you at a store, because some people cant resist the urge of stealing. Since i love Winona Ryder, i obviously aint talking about her.
That's the trade off, having the freedom of looking at produts that interest you, or going to a massage parlour, without a google app identifying your car plate!.
We pass to accepet those more invasive policing tatics as a part of existing in a more secure societ. We pass to accepet the autorities views, and i dont relegate those to the police only, but politicians, and since this is politics, their owners, the rich's to impose their views on the rest. But those the richs, also sacrifice their freedom, to have the pleasure of walking their dogs down the streets, theres maybe a security guard at every doorstep.
Our datas and every step is registered on a gauging cybernetic world of information, than some people can even acess, sometimes paying, atnother times not!
And since informations and knowledge are power, the knowledge that we as humans pocess a very clear chain of needs, and the need of protection and security, security for us, our family and pets, or neighborns, there isnt a clear need of developing a long lasting sense of security, or that would mean the decreasing need of the policing state and the concentration of power in some hands.
Policing brings in theory order and safety(i know some of you hippies would point when thats doesnt happen). Police is a very important deterent of crime, and thats includ private security, that 's why your so loved i shoot the cop rappers, or annoying music stars like Madonna, go lieve in gated comunities with private policing. Cops are also safety workers(i know, captain obviously), they're usually the first responders in the case a babie chokes with food, or a grandpa falls in the bathroom. The cops importance go well beyond preveting your loved pussy ass criminals of kicking your ass, and raping your loved ones, that includes your pet dogs.
So how much of your freedom you're willing to trade for a more secure life?
https://scholarship.law.columbia.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3093&context=faculty_scholarship
https://truthout.org/articles/a-glo...ing-as-world-capitalism-descends-into-crisis/
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/show/a...lent-crime-the-numbers-tell-a-different-story
Every societ trades a little or much of their freedom, since the dawn of societs as we know, in old Rome they had the *vigiles (in modern world, having a camera registering all our movements 24/7), so as a city or contrie grows numeraly and economicaly, the first thing to develop is the crime, only them, there will be investiment on security. Police is a very important pillar of living in a societ, even other animals have their own type of policing, like shepherd dogs taking care of sheeps, or a animal that keeps his sight on the babis of their species. Is a natural and "simple" way of protection.
The thing is living in a more secure societ has a trade off of some freedoms, you get a Loss prevention officer following you at a store, because some people cant resist the urge of stealing. Since i love Winona Ryder, i obviously aint talking about her.
That's the trade off, having the freedom of looking at produts that interest you, or going to a massage parlour, without a google app identifying your car plate!.
We pass to accepet those more invasive policing tatics as a part of existing in a more secure societ. We pass to accepet the autorities views, and i dont relegate those to the police only, but politicians, and since this is politics, their owners, the rich's to impose their views on the rest. But those the richs, also sacrifice their freedom, to have the pleasure of walking their dogs down the streets, theres maybe a security guard at every doorstep.
Our datas and every step is registered on a gauging cybernetic world of information, than some people can even acess, sometimes paying, atnother times not!
And since informations and knowledge are power, the knowledge that we as humans pocess a very clear chain of needs, and the need of protection and security, security for us, our family and pets, or neighborns, there isnt a clear need of developing a long lasting sense of security, or that would mean the decreasing need of the policing state and the concentration of power in some hands.
Policing brings in theory order and safety(i know some of you hippies would point when thats doesnt happen). Police is a very important deterent of crime, and thats includ private security, that 's why your so loved i shoot the cop rappers, or annoying music stars like Madonna, go lieve in gated comunities with private policing. Cops are also safety workers(i know, captain obviously), they're usually the first responders in the case a babie chokes with food, or a grandpa falls in the bathroom. The cops importance go well beyond preveting your loved pussy ass criminals of kicking your ass, and raping your loved ones, that includes your pet dogs.
At the same time, police are an important deterrent of crime (Durlauf & Nagin, 2011),though the empirical link between the presence of police and specific policing tactics is uncertainand contingent on the policing tactics applied. Beyond crime control, police also provideimportant services that go well beyond their primary crime control mission. Police are often firstresponders in a variety of circumstances, from fire and safety to responding to emotionallydisturbed persons or family crises, tasks that take an emotional and psychological toll on police(Marmar et al., 2006; Rando et al., 2015). Police can also play a key role in the legalsocialization of residents of the cities (Justice and Meares, 2014;an & Tyler, 2005; Tyler &
So how much of your freedom you're willing to trade for a more secure life?
https://scholarship.law.columbia.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3093&context=faculty_scholarship
https://truthout.org/articles/a-glo...ing-as-world-capitalism-descends-into-crisis/
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/show/a...lent-crime-the-numbers-tell-a-different-story
