Social The TDS Mega Thread

[Zazen]

If TDS isn’t real then why do you suffer from it and why do we have a TDS thread?

See? This is what I'm talking about. You can't add anything to the discussion because even you know Trump is awful. You use TDS to dodge discussions. I'll say it again since you are a bit slow but there is no such thing as TDS.

Conservatives were way worse about Obama and nobody would say things like ODS

 

[Fanu]

If TDS isn’t real then why do you suffer from it and why do we have a TDS thread?

1. This thread was made by a Trump supporter, thats why we have it.

2. Trump supporters are the ones that came up with "TDS" label and are the only ones using it - and they're using it when they have no rebuttal to some dumb shit Trump did (which he gets called out on)

You expect the president not to get called out on his shit? It's automatically "TDS" if you do? If so, where was "ODS" label when conservatives had massive breakdowns over Obamas presidency?

lmao.hypocrites.

 

[weed]

wrong.

he was sure there were good people on both sides in Charlottesville.
Which there were.
A lot of people just didnt want their statue taken down without any due process.

Its the media that wanted to paint everyone there as a skinhead or nazi, because if they told the truth the skinheads and nazis dont amount to many people. If Democrats dont have boogeymen they dont have a platform, thus the push to divide divide divide and sew hatred between fellow countrypersons.

nah man. timestamped:

 

[OverCoronavirus Pressure]

This thread went immediately from "The POTUS tweeted something irresponsible and this story might have resulted
from it" to "the killers weren't trump supporters!" in a heart beat.

Almost like it got intentionally derailed

 

[Steve-French]

This thread went immediately from "The POTUS tweeted something irresponsible and this story might have resulted
from it" to "the killers weren't trump supporters!" in a heart beat.

Almost like it got intentionally derailed

Did you read the story? The accusation doesn't have any basis what so ever. It would be like starting a thread saying Nancy Pelosi is responsible for Khabib Nurmagomedov puling out of UFC 249.

 

[OverCoronavirus Pressure]

Did you read the story? The accusation doesn't have any basis what so ever. It would be like starting a thread saying Nancy Pelosi is responsible for Khabib Nurmagomedov puling out of UFC 249.

No: It seems very irresponsible for a POTUS to suggest to the dumb, lizard brained masses that some sort of half assed revolution should take place.

He shouldn't have written anything remotely like it.

 

[Hadron90]

This thread went immediately from "The POTUS tweeted something irresponsible and this story might have resulted
from it" to "the killers weren't trump supporters!" in a heart beat.

Almost like it got intentionally derailed

It was a complete non-sequitor. Its would be like running an article that says "Yesterday, Trump said he was going to build the economy for a second time; today, I got my dream job offer".

 

[Hadron90]

No: It seems very irresponsible for a POTUS to suggest to the dumb, lizard brained masses that some sort of half assed revolution should take place.

He shouldn't have written anything remotely like it.

The right to protest is enshrined in the Constitution. Its fundamental to America.

 

[OverCoronavirus Pressure]

It was a complete non-sequitor. Its would be like running an article that says "Yesterday, Trump said he was going to build the economy for a second time; today, I got my dream job offer".

Didn't seem so.
It seemed direct:

Someone with a lot of influence tweeted a suggestion to (in another, worse example) "liberate Virginia, the second Amendment is under siege!" and then something ugly could be easily seen to result from it.

That's just straight irresponsible for a leader to say.

 

[OverCoronavirus Pressure]

The right to protest is enshrined in the Constitution. Its fundamental to America.

Was anyone disputing it?
The language used and the person it came from is the issue, not whether people have a right to protest.

 

[Hadron90]

Was anyone disputing it?
The language used and the person it came from is the issue, not whether people have a right to protest.

If it is enshrined in the Constitution, then President should defend that right. Here is Trump defending both Women's March and Antifa:

 

[TheGreatA]

The incident just seems like complete madness on the part of the perpetrators. When feeling "disrespected" by some guy doing a job, the appropriate thing to do is to file a complaint to his superiors. The not so appropriate thing to do, is to flip your shit and go yell at them.

Shooting them in the head is just next-level psycho shit. You can't fathom what would lead to a person ruining their whole family's future, mom, dad and son included, over their mom being told to wear a mask. If you're going to kill somebody over that level of "disrespect" then you were looking to kill people anyway.

 

[deadshot138]

How the fuck you know these people are not Trump supporters? Its not a coincidence that this happens when Trump tells michiganders that they should liberate themselves.

Because this would have happened without a pandemic. Its Flint.

 

[OverCoronavirus Pressure]

If it is enshrined in the Constitution, then President should defend that right. Here is Trump defending both Women's March and Antifa:

That was a defense of something?

And it's not something poorly expressed or written in outright inflammatory language

 

[deadshot138]

It happened in michigan. The same state that Trump say should liberate themselves. Get a clue blue.

The likelihood the perps even saw Trump say this is slim to none

 

[OverCoronavirus Pressure]

Because this would have happened without a pandemic. Its Flint.

The question is whether the what the POTUS said and how he said it influences people who do stupid, shitty things.

Tbh a POTUS should be more careful with what he says but I don't expect careful thought, expressed judiciously out of this guy.

 

[TheOneAboveAll3]

The likelihood the perps even saw Trump say this is slim to none

Thats some close minded naive shit to say.

 

[deadshot138]

The question is whether the what the POTUS said and how he said it influences people who do stupid, shitty things.

Tbh a POTUS should be more careful with what he says but I don't expect careful thought, expressed judiciously out of this guy.

You think the perps would listen to Trump? Lol.

 

[deadshot138]

Thats some close minded naive shit to say.

I didn't know he said it till I saw this thread.

 

[Sketch]

See? This is what I'm talking about. You can't add anything to the discussion because even you know Trump is awful. You use TDS to dodge discussions. I'll say it again since you are a bit slow but there is no such thing as TDS.

Conservatives were way worse about Obama and nobody would say things like ODS

You can keep saying there is no such thing as TDS but there is. Mods have even allowed this thread to reach a version 2 because it is necessary to help the board flow smoothly.