THE REPORT, buttoned up (SCO Thread v. 33)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Nameless Ghoul said:
tenor.gif


The pattern of the redactions are similar to the clothing color pattern
Click to expand...
There's nothing to lighten up about where there's no understanding.
I don't get triggered about nothing.
 
Remember those questions that Mueller had Trump answer?

Trump's legal team was masterful. Rudy just said they only answered questions regarding everything prior to Trump's inauguration.

They told them to take them to court if they wanted information after that date.

Why?

Because they knew Mueller's team already had the answers to those questions and it was a perjury trap.

Conversations with McGhan, Comey, Sessions, Christie, etc.

Bully the bully. Call their bluff. <13>
 
Looks like someone didn't get the message that Trump fans are supposed to pretend to think that he was cleared by the report:

 
IngaVovchanchyn said:
Yo estudio espanol en mi computadora, pero yo no comprendo esa frase.

Yo @Rod1. Is that even partially coherent? I been spanishing on duolingo.
Click to expand...

The second "yo" is unnecesary since "comprendo" is a first person conjugation so its like a pleonasm. Otherwise its great.
 
OverPressure said:
There's nothing to lighten up about where there's no understanding.
I don't get triggered about nothing.
Click to expand...

Other than salacious personal information in the hopes that it would be politically damaging, what are you hoping to find in the redacted portions?

The "smoking gun" you're so desperate to find isn't in the report, full stop. If it was, it would have already been acted upon.
 
Jack V Savage said:
Looks like someone didn't get the message that Trump fans are supposed to pretend to think that he was cleared by the report:

Click to expand...

Both things are held to be true simultaneously. It's all a fake hoax by traitors and enemies of the people, and it also carries full legitimacy in completely exonerating him. Seems straightforward. Unless it needs to be backward. It's both, when you really think about it.
 
Farmer Br0wn said:
Other than salacious personal information in the hopes that it would be politically damaging, what are you hoping to find in the redacted portions?

The "smoking gun" you're so desperate to find isn't in the report, full stop. If it was, it would have already been acted upon.
Click to expand...
Where did I express any hope about what's redacted?
Are you sure you're responding to the right post?
 
IngaVovchanchyn said:
My defense is that I don't care what you think. It does not bother me to be called a liar when I have not lied. I've been called a liar for directly quoting Mueller in this thread. You frequently call me a liar when the real problem seems to be your inability to articulate or understand complex arguments. Also, I'm not particularly impressed with your own forthrightness.

Try to argue substantial content rather than personal drama.
Click to expand...
You sure were sniffling and whipping your nose when people cited your lying prior and called you out on it. You went into a drama fit asking whyyyy? But I prefer your new stance that you don't mind being cited for your lying as you will take the stance it is them and not you. BUt yes, you do lie a lot. Thus why so many call you on it.

And I also don't care what you think or feel the need to spin.

Again in your need to spin you completely ignore this, below the very thing that puts the LIE to your prior statement and that you are desperate to turn the page and say 'what about...' instead of trying to address honestly. Addressing it honestly is simply not within your capacity once you realize you said something wrong.

So i'll just repeat so people can see your lie.

and please, you (or any of your cheerleaders) can try and defend that no investigation would be warranted with any 1 of the 3 below present, let alone all 3.


------------

You position that the Mueller investigation had no adequate basis to begin with is bold faced lie. There is not a single instance, regardless of who is in power where any one of the three FACTS in play below would not justify an investigation.

1. a foreign gov't, particularly a hostile one suspected of meddling in the US election and trying to impact results in favour of a specific candidate
2. The Campaign's key members and the Candidate have all sorts of links and coordination with the foreign gov't at issue who is meddling
3. The candidate and members of his key election team lying incessantly about any and all contacts ('link' & 'Coordination') with said gov't illegal or not


Any ONE of the above would require Investigation, let alone all three existing concurrently.
 
Jack V Savage said:
Looks like someone didn't get the message that Trump fans are supposed to pretend to think that he was cleared by the report:

Click to expand...


I have some bad news Jack. The government holds the burden of proof. Not getting charged after a lengthy and thorough investigation is technically getting “cleared.”
 
grizzard2bid said:
Trump has been a GREAT president. Many consider Clinton to have been a "good" president, and Trump murks him.
Click to expand...

President Trump failed that test when he said there were "Good People (Nazis)". These are people that want to murder me just because God made me with dark skin.

<{hfved}>
 
MikeMcMann said:
You sure were sniffling and whipping your nose when people cited your lying prior and called you out on it. You went into a drama fit asking whyyyy? But I prefer your new stance that you don't mind being cited for your lying as you will take the stance it is them and not you. BUt yes, you do lie a lot. Thus why so many call you on it.

And I also don't care what you think or feel the need to spin.

Again in your need to spin you completely ignore this, below the very thing that puts the LIE to your prior statement and that you are desperate to turn the page and say 'what about...' instead of trying to address honestly. Addressing it honestly is simply not within your capacity once you realize you said something wrong.

So i'll just repeat so people can see your lie.

and please, you (or any of your cheerleaders) can try and defend that no investigation would be warranted with any 1 of the 3 below present, let alone all 3.


------------

You position that the Mueller investigation had no adequate basis to begin with is bold faced lie. There is not a single instance, regardless of who is in power where any one of the three FACTS in play below would not justify an investigation.

1. a foreign gov't, particularly a hostile one suspected of meddling in the US election and trying to impact results in favour of a specific candidate
2. The Campaign's key members and the Candidate have all sorts of links and coordination with the foreign gov't at issue who is meddling
3. The candidate and members of his key election team lying incessantly about any and all contacts ('link' & 'Coordination') with said gov't illegal or not


Any ONE of the above would require Investigation, let alone all three existing concurrently.
Click to expand...

Jeez, you have such long posts. How long did that take? All that essay writing won’t change reality. Take a break my man. Go cook something perhaps.
 
glenwo2 said:
Or maybe just us? {<shrug}
Click to expand...
It's just borderline insulting the way he uses his best words in such a patronizing way.
But then, neither myself not anyone else is smart enough to understand his taxes, so there it is. We dumb.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
1,281,152
Messages
58,344,321
Members
176,009
Latest member
wmmaf

Share this page

Back
Top