THE REPORT, buttoned up (SCO Thread v. 33)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Oh, so Mueller wasn’t referring to them as part of “the media” he just meant Fox News. I wasn’t aware he said that my bad.

<{Heymansnicker}>

Do we need to revisit the majority of media coverage in the wake of the Barr letter? You mooks were doing your premature victory dance, I'd figure you'd still have the taste in your mouth.
 
Do we need to revisit the majority of media coverage in the wake of the Barr letter? You mooks were doing your premature victory dance, I'd figure you'd still have the taste in your mouth.



There’s nothing premature about it.

We won.
 
yes...."Premature victory dance". Plenty of that shit yesterday by the Leftist Dipshit Brigade....."retard".
 
Do we need to revisit the majority of media coverage in the wake of the Barr letter? You mooks were doing your premature victory dance, I'd figure you'd still have the taste in your mouth.

"Premature"???

What's changed?
 
Do we need to revisit the majority of media coverage in the wake of the Barr letter? You mooks were doing your premature victory dance, I'd figure you'd still have the taste in your mouth.

Or you can just revisit your mind meld with Mueller to show us how you learned his true meaning of “the media coverage.”
 
"Premature"???

What's changed?

Must not be able to read in Canuckistan.

{<hhh]

Or you can just revisit your mind meld with Mueller to show us how you learned his true meaning of “the media coverage.”

The letter was released after the Barr letter, but before the full report.

It doesn't take much more than 5th grade logic to figure put that he's talking about the media coverage after the Barr letter, but before the full report.

Why would he be talking about media coverage from April in March?

<{1-1}>
 
Must not be able to read in Canuckistan.

{<hhh]



The letter was released after the Barr letter, but before the full report.

It doesn't take much more than 5th grade logic to figure put that he's talking about the media coverage after the Barr letter, but before the full report.

Why would he be talking about media coverage from April in March?

<{1-1}>

Oh, no shit? That’s exactly what I said? Then you read his mind and learned that “the media coverage” actually meant “just Fox News saying no collusion no obstruction.”
 
Oh, no shit? That’s exactly what I said?

So why did you go full retard about mind melds if you could glean the meaning of "the media coverage" from 30 seconds of critical thinking skills?
 
Oh, no shit? That’s exactly what I said? Then you read his mind and learned that “the media coverage” actually meant “just Fox News saying no collusion no obstruction.”

Where would we be without Falsedawn's "informative" commentary? <DCWhoa>

Looks like he doesn't like Mike Tyson anymore....."nice avy"
 
So why did you go full retard about mind melds if you could glean the meaning of "the media coverage" from 30 seconds of critical thinking skills?

Oh my bad, you didn’t mind meld his true meaning, you gleaned it. Cool.

<{Heymansnicker}>
 
Oh my bad, you didn’t mind meld his true meaning, you gleaned it. Cool.

<{Heymansnicker}>

<Huh2>

Gotta say, this was the dumbest exchange i've had all week. Way to lower the bar.

No wonder you guys are still screeching the same low IQ soundbites. Devs programmed the NPCs really shitty this go round.
 
<Huh2>

Gotta say, this was the dumbest exchange i've had all week. Way to lower the bar.

No wonder you guys are still screeching the same low IQ soundbites. Devs programmed the NPCs really shitty this go round.


<36>


Yeah dude, repeating the words of the AG, Rosenstien, and the OLC is a “low iq soundbite”.


<TrumpWrong1>
 
"Premature"???

What's changed?

The report came out, and it showed obstruction and possible collusion. And it turns out that Mueller did object to Barr's characterization (your argument had been that Barr's characterization must be accurate because if it wasn't, Mueller would object to it).
 
The report came out, and it showed obstruction and possible collusion. And it turns out that Mueller did object to Barr's characterization (your argument had been that Barr's characterization must be accurate because if it wasn't, Mueller would object to it).

Seems like you haven't been paying attention...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top