THE REPORT, buttoned up (SCO Thread v. 33)

[glenwo2]

I assumed ......for a sherdogger is included implicitly in every statement uttered in the WR............

Yeah but I felt it needed to be pointed out again.

In the grand scheme of things, we're all a bunch of fucking Weirdos.

 

[hillelslovak87]

Yeah but I felt it needed to be pointed out again.

In the grand scheme of things, we're all a bunch of fucking Weirdos.

You've seen my usage of gif, no?

 

[glenwo2]

You've seen my usage of gif, no?

GODDAMMIT, HILL!!

You should really put up a "will cause blindness" warning. lol

Don't stare too long.....

 

[hillelslovak87]

GODDAMMIT, HILL!!

You should really put up a "will cause blindness" warning. lol

Don't stare too long.....

It's like one of those posters, maaaan, but it has Obama too.

 

[OverCoronavirus Pressure]

Yeah but I felt it needed to be pointed out again.

In the grand scheme of things, we're all a bunch of fucking Weirdos.

 

[MikeMcMann]

Well since you won't provide the proof, then apparently there's no real evidence he said what you claim.

So you're conceding the argument then.

Very well.

Have a nice day, you lying sack of feces.

and since you won't agree that the video has meaning even if true you are conceding your view is devoid of fact and on fact will change it so I would be wasting my time.

COngrats on being a lying sack of shit who knows he is wrong.

 

[bobgeese]

a lying sack of shit who knows he is wrong.

Take a look in the mirror McCan.

 

[TheBlondBomber]

The report clearly says trump broke laws and obstructed justice.

It clearly stated they won’t indict because of some email or post it note (no law, nothing in constitution) that says the JD won’t indict a sitting president.

The report clearly stated it would be handed to congress for those types of actions moving forward.

But the report clears trump?

Fn lulz MAGAs

So why doesn't the justice department throw away that post it note and indict? Why rely on a partisan congress to indict?

 

[glenwo2]

Take a look in the mirror McCan.

The mirror would break.

 

[unimackpass]

Amazing people are still try to salvage something out of this.

 

[glenwo2]

Amazing people are still try to salvage something out of this.

More like :

 

[andnowweknow]

Mueller now personally calling AG Barr a liar.

Mueller told the attorney general that the depiction of his findings failed to capture ‘context, nature, and substance’ of probe

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...f-probe/?noredirect=on&utm_term=.e28c04075501



By Washington Post Staff
April 30 at 7:07 PM

 

[hillelslovak87]

Amazing people are still try to salvage something out of this.

Are you of the opinion that Russia just posted some facebook ads, and Trump never attempted to obstruct justice?

 

[Joe]

Mueller now personally calling AG Barr a liar.

Mueller told the attorney general that the depiction of his findings failed to capture ‘context, nature, and substance’ of probe

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...f-probe/?noredirect=on&utm_term=.e28c04075501



By Washington Post Staff
April 30 at 7:07 PM

Its almost as if Barr is not a fair broker and is out to look out for trump. who could have seen this coming?

 

[andnowweknow]

Wonder what Trump's lackey will

Its almost as if Barr is not a fair broker and is out to look out for trump. who could have seen this coming?

Mueller is an angry Democrat...a lifelong Republican lifetime Democrat.

 

[MikeMcMann]

Wonder what Trump's lackey will

Mueller is an angry Democrat...a lifelong Republican lifetime Democrat.

Deep State.

The Dems went so deep that they planted Dem operatives at the University level in Republican groups as life long republicans so no one would suspect them decades later.

 

[hillelslovak87]

Its almost as if Barr is not a fair broker and is out to look out for trump. who could have seen this coming?

 

[Bloody Pulp]

Mueller now personally calling AG Barr a liar.

Mueller told the attorney general that the depiction of his findings failed to capture ‘context, nature, and substance’ of probe

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...f-probe/?noredirect=on&utm_term=.e28c04075501



By Washington Post Staff
April 30 at 7:07 PM

“When Barr pressed him whether he thought Barr’s letter was inaccurate, Mueller said he did not, but felt that the media coverage of the letter was misinterpreting the investigation, officials said.”

 

[andnowweknow]

I hope some Republicans can grow a pair and finally speak up about this. The lying and ignoring has gotten ridiculous.

 

[andnowweknow]

“When Barr pressed him whether he thought Barr’s letter was inaccurate, Mueller said he did not, but felt that the media coverage of the letter was misinterpreting the investigation, officials said.”

It's the media's fault Barr is a liar. Lying via ommission intentionally is still lying. He's a liar.

Go away.

“The summary letter the Department sent to Congress and released to the public late in the afternoon of March 24 did not fully capture the context, nature, and substance of this office’s work and conclusions,” Mueller wrote. “There is now public confusion about critical aspects of the results of our investigation. This threatens to undermine a central purpose for which the Department appointed the Special Counsel: to assure full public confidence in the outcome of the investigations.”