The Real reason why The Polls are lying

Diogenes of Sinope

Banned
Banned
Joined
Aug 22, 2018
Messages
10,198
Reaction score
14,068



Cliffs:

-Polls are fake and skewered in Biden's favor in order to obtain funding.
-If Biden looks like he's dominating, people think their funding is actually going towards something that is worth value
-The funding mainly goes to advertising which is created by the same companies that make the fake polls.
-In short, The Polls tricked democrats into giving them money
 



Cliffs:

-Polls are fake and skewered in Biden's favor in order to obtain funding.
-If Biden looks like he's dominating, people think their funding is actually going towards something that is worth value
-The funding mainly goes to advertising which is created by the same companies that make the fake polls.
-In short, The Polls tricked democrats into giving them money


What a ridiculously pained theory. Creating the impression that Biden has this in the bag is the WORST thing the (allegedly) anti-Trump media could be doing. As it will only encourage apathy from potential Biden voters.

If anything one could reasonably make the argument that inaccurate, pro-Biden polling is some type of republican op.
 
What a ridiculously pained theory. Creating the impression that Biden has this in the bag is the WORST thing the (allegedly) anti-Trump media could be doing. As it will only encourage apathy from potential Biden voters.

If anything one could reasonably make the argument that inaccurate, pro-Biden polling is some type of republican op.
-He was right about Trump in 2016
-He was right about Biden being The opponent 2 years ago
-He was right about Kamala being the VP pick 1 year ago
-He was right about the impeachment being a nothing-burger
-and he predicts Trump will win in 2020


you haven't been right about anything for 4 years(probably longer)
 
-He was right about Trump in 2016
-He was right about Biden being The opponent 2 years ago
-He was right about Kamala being the VP pick 1 year ago
-He was right about the impeachment being a nothing-burger
-and he predicts Trump will win in 2020


you haven't been right about anything for 4 years(probably longer)

So you believe the polling companies are in cahoots with advertisers to make a buck at the expense of handing Trump the election by suppressing the Biden vote?

I guess great minds like you and Adams think alike.
 
The polls tricked the Dems so bad in 2016 they had a 4 year melt down over it because it was such a shock. For months they told Dem voters Trump has no chance, Hillary is a slam dunk win, there is no path to victory for Trump. Now here we are in 2020 and again, I think, they are going to be devastated by the result of this election.
 
Whatever the result is, it has already been tainted. Both sides know this, and are ready to go in attack-dog mode with allegations of fraud, bad faith, etc, when/if their side loses.

Sigh...wonder how much longer this crumbling structure can hold on.
 
Sigh...wonder how much longer this crumbling structure can hold on.

Maybe for hundreds of years. People keep thinking this is some sort of anomaly the way Americans are divided, we've always been divided. For 200 years we've been divided on one issue or another.
 
So yeah Trump has it in the bag. Trump by a landslide yo! Don't even need to go vote right wingers.

Campaign managers try to keep track of intangibles, like "enthusiasm". Getting people out to vote is largely effected by how much enthusiasm a candidate generates. Obama, for example, generated a ton of enthusiasm. He had huge rallies because of it too. In this case, enthusiasm goes to Trump over Biden, and by a long shot. I wouldn't worry about Republicans voting, I would worry about Democrats voting.

As an example, this is a Trump rally in Pennsylvania last night, they estimate 57,000 attended, filled the stadium, and thousands overflowed outside.



2D5EF7BE-8756-45BE-881C-BBD95B7A41F4-1024x684.jpeg
 
Last edited:
What a ridiculously pained theory. Creating the impression that Biden has this in the bag is the WORST thing the (allegedly) anti-Trump media could be doing. As it will only encourage apathy from potential Biden voters.

If anything one could reasonably make the argument that inaccurate, pro-Biden polling is some type of republican op.

Now that's some next level conspiracy theory.
 
Maybe for hundreds of years. People keep thinking this is some sort of anomaly the way Americans are divided, we've always been divided. For 200 years we've been divided on one issue or another.

When you realize the chaos is communist subversion, it's easy to go back to the days when the Dems had guys like JFK.

Takes 10-15 years to undo a lot of the Marxist brainwashing in schools and the workplace so might as well start now.

Trump Announces 'Patriotic Education' Commission
https://www.npr.org/2020/09/17/9141...education-commission-a-largely-political-move

Trump Expands Ban On Racial Sensitivity Training To Federal Contractors
https://www.npr.org/2020/09/22/9158...l-sensitivity-training-to-federal-contractors
 
-He was right about Trump in 2016
-He was right about Biden being The opponent 2 years ago
-He was right about Kamala being the VP pick 1 year ago
-He was right about the impeachment being a nothing-burger
-and he predicts Trump will win in 2020


you haven't been right about anything for 4 years(probably longer)

Oh yeah?

"While trying to find the blog post in which this prediction first appeared, I ran across an April 20, 2011 post in which Scott Adams dismissed rumors that Donald Trump was considering a run for president. He called the whole thing a big, fat practical joke that Trump was playing on the media. He even tagged the post “#General Nonsense”. Fast forward to August 5, 2015: Scott predicted Hillary would win (with 95% certainty, sans new scandals), but that Trump was the only other real contender. Fast forward a few days to August 13, 2015: The Trump learning curve is strong with Scott as he now predicts Trump will be POTUS.

So did Dilbert cartoonist Scott Adams predict Trump’s presidency? Eh. Kind of not really. First he said Trump was not going to run. Then he said Clinton would win. Then he said Trump would win. But he doesn’t bring up the first two predictions anymore, just the one that panned out."
Source: http://helvegr.com/2018/09/29/lets-score-the-accuracy-of-scott-adams-predictions
 
Campaign managers try to keep track of intangibles, like "enthusiasm". Getting people out to vote is largely effected by how much enthusiasm a candidate generates. Obama, for example, generated a ton of enthusiasm. He had huge rallies because of it too. In this case, enthusiasm goes to Trump over Biden, and by a long shot. I wouldn't worry about Republicans voting, I would worry about Democrats voting.

As an example, this is a Trump rally in Pennsylvania last night, they estimate 57,000 attended, filled the stadium, and thousands overflowed outside.



2D5EF7BE-8756-45BE-881C-BBD95B7A41F4-1024x684.jpeg


This shit is why we have so many infections with covid. Nobody in the world is doing these kind of rallies and you see all these morons piled up and most of them not wearing a mask. This nightmare can't end soon enough.
 
This shit is why we have so many infections with covid. Nobody in the world is doing these kind of rallies and you see all these morons piled up and most of them not wearing a mask. This nightmare can't end soon enough.

My point is that Biden couldn't get 57,000 if he tried. Trump has the enthusiasm intangible and its probably going to propel him to victory once again. If he has 50k attend in a state like Pennsylvania the Dems are in deep shit. This isn't Texas we're talking about here.
 
Back
Top