Law THE POLICE SHOOTING/USE OF FORCE MEGATHREAD: discussions to determine if justified or not

Just like you don’t feel it necessary to learn about any of the cases here, I don’t find it necessary to look at our entire history to find particular instances where “you got burned a time or two” but someone tagged you for some reason and I know we have had issues in the past. So maybe that is on me for assuming it was a coo topic since I rarely post about politics or other issues, or at least I will say my preferred topic is cop issues. I never said you, or anyone else, was in some way obligated to post here. There are posters, however, that have gone out of their way to tag me in one of the bad cop threads to run their mouths, so I did tag them specifically, and they 100% bitched out. You and I don’t have to have any further discussion if you’re unwilling to discuss these cases or offer any new ones. I am sure we will clash again in the future.
You completely side-stepped all the pertinent aspects of my post yet again. And you absolutely did imply some sort of obligation to debate you else be labeled afraid for some fucking stupid reason.

You've gone completely off the deep end. It's like if I tagged you into the Ukraine-Russia thread (if you hadn't posted there before), you respond "uhhhhh what?", and someone else getting all up in your face for not expressing an opinion about who did what right or wrong in the latest border skirmish. It's misplaced anger. You should give some thought to its proper target.

Edit: and honest to fuck why aren't you picking fights with @panem-et-circenses since that tool keeps tagging me into your threads trying to start shit between me and you? How the fuck have you not noticed that? GAH!
 
You completely side-stepped all the pertinent aspects of my post yet again. And you absolutely did imply some sort of obligation to debate you else be labeled afraid for some fucking stupid reason.

You've gone completely off the deep end. It's like if I tagged you into the Ukraine-Russia thread (if you hadn't posted there before), you respond "uhhhhh what?", and someone else getting all up in your face for not expressing an opinion about who did what right or wrong in the latest border skirmish. It's misplaced anger. You should give some thought to its proper target.

Edit: and honest to fuck why aren't you picking fights with @panem-et-circenses since that tool keeps tagging me into your threads trying to start shit between me and you? How the fuck have you not noticed that? GAH!

If I recall, I did tag him at some point. I am not off the deep end. I am just sick of activists, politicians, shitbags and their family members, and lawyers poised to make millions crying over police use of force that is completely justified in my opinion. I laid out why I believe my opinions are correct and all these people that just absolutely hate police refuse to engage in any kind of debate to justify their opinions. I gave them the perfect opportunity to do so using cases that had protests, lawsuits, criminal charges against officers, etc. sinister, jefferz, freakroor, wadtucket, via heeto all fucking pussed out. Again, I didn’t call you out. I know we’ve had clashes before, but if you don’t belong in that group, then I apologize. It’s real fucking hard to keep track of all my haters.
 
Again, I didn’t call you out..
You didn't?
I didn’t tag you, someone else did, but it was likely because you talk shit on cops and have run your mouth to me on occasion. But you flat out admitted you don’t want to take the time to learn about a case enough to have an intelligent response, so you’ll continue to sit back , lurk, and throw in a smart ass comment every once in a while-just as long as you don’t have to commit to making an actual fact-based argument, unless of course, you’re paid
 
@nhbbear if you ever figured out how to use youtube here is one for you. Cop blasts a 75 year old lady with dementia holding kitchen knives. Shooting was found to be constitutional. Cop kept his job, but wasn't on patrol anymore. Looks like the city gave the family around $3 million. Federal suit was filed too, but I couldn't find a conclusion on that.

My legal opinion is that this cop is a piece of shit.

 
@nhbbear if you ever figured out how to use youtube here is one for you. Cop blasts a 75 year old lady with dementia holding kitchen knives. Shooting was found to be constitutional. Cop kept his job, but wasn't on patrol anymore. Looks like the city gave the family around $3 million. Federal suit was filed too, but I couldn't find a conclusion on that.

My legal opinion is that this cop is a piece of shit.



I will take a look at it when I have the time. But how in the fuck do you figure “when you figure out how to use youtube?” I posted a video with every case I presented. And I am also going to go ahead and say “I told you so” at the beginning of this thread when I flat out called it that no one would want to discuss any of these cases and would say “well, what about this one” and present some fucked up case that probably belongs in the bad cop thread.
 
You didn't?

Dude, I am done with you. You clearly have zero intention or interest in discussing any of these cases or any case in general and just want to argue stupid shit off topic, so piss off.
 
And I am also going to go ahead and say “I told you so” at the beginning of this thread when I flat out called it that no one would want to discuss any of these cases and would say “well, what about this one” and present some fucked up case that probably belongs in the bad cop thread.
Apparently nobody wants to read your dissertations on old cases that have already been discussed to death. New shootings or lesser known incidents might get more play. Also, I'm not trying to post a "well what about this one". I saw one that was interesting because it probably looks shitty to the average observer, but it was found to be a legal shooting. Again, I end up siding with the cops in the vast majority of shootings.

However, if you want one that is plain fucked, here you go. Cops got fired and then reinstated. They have another hearing on their manslaughter charges next month.

 

That was because clicking on the age restriction from the link took me to YouTube but not connected with my account. I asked for a link so I could find the story using my YouTube account
 
Apparently nobody wants to read your dissertations on old cases that have already been discussed to death. New shootings or lesser known incidents might get more play. Also, I'm not trying to post a "well what about this one". I saw one that was interesting because it probably looks shitty to the average observer, but it was found to be a legal shooting. Again, I end up siding with the cops in the vast majority of shootings.

However, if you want one that is plain fucked, here you go. Cops got fired and then reinstated. They have another hearing on their manslaughter charges next month.



And I will check all of them out. Like I said, I just need a name so I can find them on my YouTube account. Or a link to the story. Atm I don’t have time. I am at work and I have to handle a few things and get my afternoon schedule out and get those employees in place, then I will have the time
 
Dude, I am done with you. You clearly have zero intention or interest in discussing any of these cases or any case in general and just want to argue stupid shit off topic, so piss off.
LOL you already forgot that I never had any intention of posting in this thread until I was tagged, responded only to the person who tagged me, then left it at that until you decided you wanted to pick a fight. LMAO @ "I am done with you." What kind of drugs are you on, anyway?

And I already fucking told you I had zero intention or interest in discussing any of these cases in my first or second reply to you.

I repeat:
I didn't "find my way in here" so much as I was tagged and I responded to the individual who tagged me.

All due respect to your deep interest in this topic, I don't have the time or patience for this thread, nor am I particularly interested. Whether you realized it when you commented or not, I have not made much of a habit of posting in these "cop threads" except to make the odd point here and there, generally--I mostly lurk.

I'm not the hate all cops type yet I am dismayed by the apparent lack of consequences for many bad ones, particularly in the past, particularly before the proliferation of cameras, and when you see entire municipal police departments being found corrupt, it's hard to believe the issue is not very widespread, contrary to your contention that the number of bad cops is relatively low. Having said that, I've also said many times that anecdotes aren't worth a fuck and there really isn't any feasible way to determine numbers one way or the other to obtain valid statistics.

So that leaves what, exactly? Debating individual situations which are wholly dependent upon context and therefore requiring a full understanding of the background of the case and a thorough review of the facts. Sounds like fun--if you're getting paid. But I don't even want to stare at a screen for the length of time it takes to read one of your screeds.
Your response to this was to say, not my fault, I didn't tag you, but I'm going to try to shit on you, dare you to debate me anyway, and call you afraid (for whatever pathetically stupid reason) if I don't. But I'm not calling you out, oh no.
My response:
lol if you have a problem why don't you take it up with the person who tagged me instead of getting all uppity over me when I had no interest in posting ITT in the first place?

Since when is any one on here obligated to take a position on a thread topic just because it's what other people want so they can attack that position?

Regarding your last sentence, I gather from that you can't recall any of the times I agreed with you. You're just picking a fight with me for no reason other than your disappointment that few people are willing to play your little game. It's similarly not my fault that this disappointment has bled into your tone and commentary in other threads and I see nothing wrong with calling it out.

tl;dr I know you're awfully butt hurt over me calling you out on your "doctors invented a new condition" crap but you can relax your sphincter. I intended to help you realize you were unnecessarily straying into unfounded anti-scientific rhetoric to make a point. Get a grip.
I was nothing but respectful and your every reply to me sounds totally unhinged in its disconnect from reality.

Also LMAO @ the irony of "Ok. Calm down and take a breath. You seem to be taking this personally." coming from you.
 
RAaq3vQ.gif
giphy.gif
 
and honest to fuck why aren't you picking fights with @panem-et-circenses since that tool keeps tagging me into your threads trying to start shit between me and you? How the fuck have you not noticed that? GAH!

iirc, I only tagged you in his thread about his em dash usage (and you answered in the lounge a week or so ago). Can’t blame me for your spat, buddy. I’m afraid @nhbbear has to readjust his list in order to add you. It’s out of my hands now.
 
iirc, I only tagged you in his thread about his em dash usage (and you answered in the lounge a week or so ago). Can’t blame me for your spat, buddy. I’m afraid @nhbbear has to readjust his list in order to add you. It’s out of my hands now.
I take no blame for the "spat" either so it's whatever to me. I'll just repeat my first reply to him until it sinks in.
 
Last edited:
Leonard Cure, Oct 7, 2023, Camden county Georgia

This one is very recent and had its own thread for a couple days at least. Cure was convicted of a crime he didn’t commit. That disgusts me. Cure the as no angel prior to that false conviction racking up multiple robbery convictions and other crimes and because of those convictions he was sentenced to life, but no person should be wrongfully imprisoned for a crime they didn’t commit-especially for 16 years.
To me, almost as bad as being wrongly convicted is the fact that he was given a pittance as payment for losing half his life-something like 800k.

That aside, Cure had been out for a while and was coming home visiting his mother when he passed by a police officer going well over a hundred mph, he was pulled over and things almost immediately went south.

A couple things happened that could have possibly prevented what happens next, but we will never know. The officer could have been a bit calmer or used some slightly different verbiage and explained his reasons for wanting at the rear of the truck, but he ultimately did nothing wrong. One thing you also have to realize is that highway noise is very loud-way louder than people think and you have to raise your voice to be heard. Regardless, cure wasn’t hearing it anyways.

He was speeding in excess of 100 mph and recklessly driving. Per scotus case PA vs Mimms, a police office can order a person out of a vehicle.

Why would an officer do this? For several reasons. 1. Because of highway traffic speeding by is a safety issue. 2. Because of the way Cure was driving, an officer may think he is impaired and want to get him to the back of the vehicle to conduct sobriety tests and or get him out of the car because he may try to flee with the way he was driving. 3. Because the officer is alone and that vehicle has not been checked for weapons and neither has cure. 4. The officer has that right and cure has to comply or get arrested for obstructing.

Cure begins to question why he should listen to the officer asking what authority he had to stop him and why. His response was that he was going over 100 and cures response is basically “so, that’s a ticket.” Deputy again orders him to put his hands on the vehicle or he will get tased. Deputy informs him that he is under arrest and that traffic offenses are criminal charges in Georgia. Cure says he’s not going to jail and is tased. He is tasered twice and it has no effect. Cure immediately starts flailing his arms and ripping at the wires and then goes on the offensive and begins attacking the deputy by pushing him towards traffic, grappling with him, and ultimately choking him. The officer pulls out a second non-lethal weapon and begins striking cure in the legs with a baton to no effect. Cure even says “yeah, bitch” as he is being struck and again while he is choking the deputy and right when he is shot. What you really have to remember is that this is all on the side of a highway with vehicles speeding by and one slip or shove, and you’re dead. Also, cure is a big and aggressive dude and his attacks on the deputy were not self defense but we’re intended to seriously harm or kill the deputy.

So while grappling, the deputy pulls out his service weapon and shoots cure once under the arm and into the heart. Deputy after a few tense moments begins life saving measures to no avail.

Commhnity and media response:
It was immediate and every single story focused on three things-cure being wrongfully imprisoned, his being black, and him being pulled over for an unknown reason. The video shows all of that and also explains why he was pulled over and arrested. The media continued to downplay cures attacks on the deputy stating “he put his hands on the deputy’s face. Really? That was a choke. The community was worse calling it an execution and the family hired my favorite ambulance chasing, race-baiting, chicken Hawk civil rights lawsuit king, ben crump. Below will be his press conference and the video.

My thoughts:
Cure was wrongly imprisoned and being told he was going to jail may have triggered some trauma ot ptsd. But his response immediately was dismissive and almost sovereign citizen like in his demanding to know why the deputy thought he could even pull him over. His attack was worse and very violent. The officer tried multiple forms of less than lethal tactics and tools to no avail. Shooting him on the side of that bush highway was necessary and justified. I have fought and chased people on the side of a highway and in traffic a few times. It is scary as shit and very dangerous. You can feels the cars and especially the semis flying past and it shakes the roadway and you.

I have two criticisms of the deputy. First, I think he came in a bit too hot. Not really bad, but it doesn’t help any situation. Yelling “get out” as your first words are not ideal. This is a reckless driving incident possibly dui but it is not a felony takedown or traffic stop. He should have gone to the opposite side of the vehicle so he could safely talk to him, explain why he stopped him and why he is telling him to get out of the vehicle. I am a big believer in explaining things very clearly and I have always found that if you explain your stance to people, it helps them understand where you’re coming from. My second issue is with the use of the taser initially. Tasers are for actively aggressive subjects. The second tasing was absolutely justified and when the taser should be used, however, for some reason, neither shot worked like intended. My thoughts on the first tasering are that you have to factor in that you are on a very busy highway with very fast moving traffic, so grabbing and trying to force an arrest of a subject who is refusing to be arrested is not wise. He does give warnings to cure who refuses to comply. He could have held him at bay with the taser until backup arrived, but when you use a taser that close with a perfect back shot, you expect it to work. Perhaps he was a bit too close to get a big enough spread of darts to have the desired nmi(neuro muscular incapacitation). Narrow spread means less muscles affected.

As usual, crump is being himself and a piece of shit. They will try to sue, guaranteed. The county will probably settle as usual to avoid a jury possibly fucking this up.

The video of the traffic stop and fight.



Go to the five min mark. This is where it gets good. crump in his marbled mouth southern drawl calling for “troof” and you will hear from attorney “sef” (Seth)-begins saying that leonard escaped one injustice to then face another “bias” and then raises his voice and says he and his brother were talking about how he wouldn’t have been killed if he was white “over a traffic stop” and calls for justice for leonard. They also say that cure was live-streaming this from Facebook live and they demand the release of that video and want to know why it was taken down and there is a slight inclination of possible legal action against fb. Jesus Christ this guy is a bag of shit.



response from the family immediately after video is released. Brother still says his brother was murdered and crump is waiting for a decision from the prosecutor office to see if charges will be filed against the deputy.


https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/crim...-slain-man-choking-cop-goes-viral/ar-AA1ivBSX
 
@Joshuaace one person I forgot to tag for this thread that always likes to argue how bad cops are and has tried to say on several occasions that I have no idea what I am talking about and I am in fact, dangerous and everything that is wrong with law enforcement. Meanwhile, he claims to be a defense attorney and if so, his attitude, progressive prosecutors, politicians, social media, so called activists, civil rights lawyers and family to continually coddle, victimize, martyr, and make excuses for violent shitbag offenders is everything that’s wrong with the criminal and civil courts.

Come at me bro. Pick a case, there’s plenty to choose from
 
Last edited:
Leonard Cure, Oct 7, 2023, Camden county Georgia

This one is very recent and had its own thread for a couple days at least. Cure was convicted of a crime he didn’t commit. That disgusts me. Cure the as no angel prior to that false conviction racking up multiple robbery convictions and other crimes and because of those convictions he was sentenced to life, but no person should be wrongfully imprisoned for a crime they didn’t commit-especially for 16 years.
To me, almost as bad as being wrongly convicted is the fact that he was given a pittance as payment for losing half his life-something like 800k.

That aside, Cure had been out for a while and was coming home visiting his mother when he passed by a police officer going well over a hundred mph, he was pulled over and things almost immediately went south.

A couple things happened that could have possibly prevented what happens next, but we will never know. The officer could have been a bit calmer or used some slightly different verbiage and explained his reasons for wanting at the rear of the truck, but he ultimately did nothing wrong. One thing you also have to realize is that highway noise is very loud-way louder than people think and you have to raise your voice to be heard. Regardless, cure wasn’t hearing it anyways.

He was speeding in excess of 100 mph and recklessly driving. Per scotus case PA vs Mimms, a police office can order a person out of a vehicle.

Why would an officer do this? For several reasons. 1. Because of highway traffic speeding by is a safety issue. 2. Because of the way Cure was driving, an officer may think he is impaired and want to get him to the back of the vehicle to conduct sobriety tests and or get him out of the car because he may try to flee with the way he was driving. 3. Because the officer is alone and that vehicle has not been checked for weapons and neither has cure. 4. The officer has that right and cure has to comply or get arrested for obstructing.

Cure begins to question why he should listen to the officer asking what authority he had to stop him and why. His response was that he was going over 100 and cures response is basically “so, that’s a ticket.” Deputy again orders him to put his hands on the vehicle or he will get tased. Deputy informs him that he is under arrest and that traffic offenses are criminal charges in Georgia. Cure says he’s not going to jail and is tased. He is tasered twice and it has no effect. Cure immediately starts flailing his arms and ripping at the wires and then goes on the offensive and begins attacking the deputy by pushing him towards traffic, grappling with him, and ultimately choking him. The officer pulls out a second non-lethal weapon and begins striking cure in the legs with a baton to no effect. Cure even says “yeah, bitch” as he is being struck and again while he is choking the deputy and right when he is shot. What you really have to remember is that this is all on the side of a highway with vehicles speeding by and one slip or shove, and you’re dead. Also, cure is a big and aggressive dude and his attacks on the deputy were not self defense but we’re intended to seriously harm or kill the deputy.

So while grappling, the deputy pulls out his service weapon and shoots cure once under the arm and into the heart. Deputy after a few tense moments begins life saving measures to no avail.

Commhnity and media response:
It was immediate and every single story focused on three things-cure being wrongfully imprisoned, his being black, and him being pulled over for an unknown reason. The video shows all of that and also explains why he was pulled over and arrested. The media continued to downplay cures attacks on the deputy stating “he put his hands on the deputy’s face. Really? That was a choke. The community was worse calling it an execution and the family hired my favorite ambulance chasing, race-baiting, chicken Hawk civil rights lawsuit king, ben crump. Below will be his press conference and the video.

My thoughts:
Cure was wrongly imprisoned and being told he was going to jail may have triggered some trauma ot ptsd. But his response immediately was dismissive and almost sovereign citizen like in his demanding to know why the deputy thought he could even pull him over. His attack was worse and very violent. The officer tried multiple forms of less than lethal tactics and tools to no avail. Shooting him on the side of that bush highway was necessary and justified. I have fought and chased people on the side of a highway and in traffic a few times. It is scary as shit and very dangerous. You can feels the cars and especially the semis flying past and it shakes the roadway and you.

I have two criticisms of the deputy. First, I think he came in a bit too hot. Not really bad, but it doesn’t help any situation. Yelling “get out” as your first words are not ideal. This is a reckless driving incident possibly dui but it is not a felony takedown or traffic stop. He should have gone to the opposite side of the vehicle so he could safely talk to him, explain why he stopped him and why he is telling him to get out of the vehicle. I am a big believer in explaining things very clearly and I have always found that if you explain your stance to people, it helps them understand where you’re coming from. My second issue is with the use of the taser initially. Tasers are for actively aggressive subjects. The second tasing was absolutely justified and when the taser should be used, however, for some reason, neither shot worked like intended. My thoughts on the first tasering are that you have to factor in that you are on a very busy highway with very fast moving traffic, so grabbing and trying to force an arrest of a subject who is refusing to be arrested is not wise. He does give warnings to cure who refuses to comply. He could have held him at bay with the taser until backup arrived, but when you use a taser that close with a perfect back shot, you expect it to work. Perhaps he was a bit too close to get a big enough spread of darts to have the desired nmi(neuro muscular incapacitation). Narrow spread means less muscles affected.

As usual, crump is being himself and a piece of shit. They will try to sue, guaranteed. The county will probably settle as usual to avoid a jury possibly fucking this up.

The video of the traffic stop and fight.



Go to the five min mark. This is where it gets good. crump in his marbled mouth southern drawl calling for “troof” and you will hear from attorney “sef” (Seth)-begins saying that leonard escaped one injustice to then face another “bias” and then raises his voice and says he and his brother were talking about how he wouldn’t have been killed if he was white “over a traffic stop” and calls for justice for leonard. They also say that cure was live-streaming this from Facebook live and they demand the release of that video and want to know why it was taken down and there is a slight inclination of possible legal action against fb. Jesus Christ this guy is a bag of shit.



response from the family immediately after video is released. Brother still says his brother was murdered and crump is waiting for a decision from the prosecutor office to see if charges will be filed against the deputy.


https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/crim...-slain-man-choking-cop-goes-viral/ar-AA1ivBSX


Yeah I remember seeing this. This is all on Mr. Cure.

I can understand him not liking cops due to his past, but maybe don't break the law then. Your past doesn't give you the right to speed and not follow orders.
 
Yeah I remember seeing this. This is all on Mr. Cure.

I can understand him not liking cops due to his past, but maybe don't break the law then. Your past doesn't give you the right to speed and not follow orders.

Correct. His mother said in several interviews that she was always terrified this would happen and his family and lawyers said he was doing the always predictable “getting his life together” bit. If leonard and his family were always so worried this would happen then why is he driving like an asshole and resisting arrest? He was a piece of shit before the false conviction racking up several armed robbery charges. He was a violent turd way before 2003
 
@Joshuaace one person I forgot to tag for this thread that always likes to argue how bad cops are and has tried to say on several occasions that I have no idea what I am talking about and I am in fact, dangerous and everything that is wrong with law enforcement. Meanwhile, he claims to be a defense attorney and if so, his attitude, progressive prosecutors, politicians, social media, so called activists, civil rights lawyers and family to continually coddle, victimize, martyr, and make excuses for violent shitbag offenders is everything that’s wrong with the criminal and civil courts.

Coke at me bro. Pick a case, there’s plenty to choose from

I'm reading this as a call for help. You okay?


and wth does Coke at you mean?
 
I'm reading this as a call for help. You okay?


and wth does Coke at you mean?

No call for help. There are a bunch of bitches in this warroom and a shit ton of activists, politicians, and people like ben crump (who will not even respond to “his” own tweets) who will run their mouths about cops and police use of force. They post about it, march, riot, protest, loot, run for office and campaign on the backs of this issue (cori bush), maim and even murder over some of these cases. But not one of them will take any time away from their vapid two word posting to come in here and actually debate any case within this thread. Not my haters, not the acab twats, not even the mod that kept merging my threads into “what did cops do wrong today” mega threads. So I am calling all ya all out to see if someone has the stones to put their money where the cocks of strangers at glory holes everywhere goes. I called it very early that there would be the lazy cunts that would pop in, throw some weak insults and run and at most, someone would respond with “well, what about this case?” But not one response on any case in here.

Every one of these cases have been protested, talked and reported about, had riots and murders of police over, had massive lawsuits, and even criminal charges against the police officers involved. So, auto-correct aside (it just did it again) come at me, bro.
 
Back
Top