The Photography thread!

Often when I use it I tend to do a basic edit that brings up the shadows then convert to Jpeg for more indepth editing.
 
I do use my phone a lot, while phone cameras have improved tremendously, they are still very limited in what you can do with them and are a lot harder to just set down and have them fire etc.

I’ve used my phone on a tripod , and even with a rode micro book mike and a lav at times

I’d rather just have a small camera. The tiny sensors in the phones are a huge drawback and also needing apps to adjust settings and shit.

A real camera is 1000x better in functionality in so many ways.

I dunno why, but I can't take any good picture on a smartphone (got the iphone 7). Maybe it's the lack of controls, I dunno.

How many of you guys fly drones? I used to love flying them but they made it a pain in the ass around here to fly them.
 
Some grizzly puppy's and a eagle.

o5lvI9I.jpg


5tyWOZi.jpg


qR0tcPf.jpg
 
I dunno why, but I can't take any good picture on a smartphone (got the iphone 7). Maybe it's the lack of controls, I dunno.

How many of you guys fly drones? I used to love flying them but they made it a pain in the ass around here to fly them.
There are apps for full controls like you would on a camera, but it’s another PITB.

I just don’t like using it for anything other than a secondary device when shooting.

IF I’m using it to control a camera, I can’t use it for a secondary camera at the same time.
 
Does the local news pay people for photos and videos of breaking news?
 
I do use my phone a lot, while phone cameras have improved tremendously, they are still very limited in what you can do with them and are a lot harder to just set down and have them fire etc.

I’ve used my phone on a tripod , and even with a rode micro book mike and a lav at times

I’d rather just have a small camera. The tiny sensors in the phones are a huge drawback and also needing apps to adjust settings and shit.

A real camera is 1000x better in functionality in so many ways.

The point and shoot camera you mentioned before had the same size sensor as a phone though.
 
New Sony A9 ii announced




Update: Pre-order now available: [URL='https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/1509600-REG/sony_ilce9m2_b_alpha_a9_ii_mirrorless.htm']B&H Photo
| Adorama $4,498.00

-------------------

The second generation of speed, the Sony Alpha a9 II takes the impressive feature-set of its predecessor and adds enhanced connectivity, a refined body design, and even quicker performance. Utilizing the proven 24.2MP full-frame Exmor RS BSI stacked CMOS sensor and an updated BIONZ X processor, the a9 II sports especially quick and responsive capabilities. Up to 20 fps shooting is possible with a silent electronic shutter or up to 10 fps with a mechanical shutter is supported, along with a wide sensitivity range that reaches up to an expanded ISO 204800.

The sensor's design also incorporates a 693-point phase-detection autofocus system, which offers intelligent subject tracking and Real-time Eye AF to ensure critical focus on moving subjects. The BIONZ X also performs up to 60 AF/AE functions per second to go along with the 20 fps shooting for reliable results in quickly changing situations. In addition to stills, UHD 4K video recording is supported at up to 30 fps and Quick and Slow Motion recording is also available.

Additionally, 5-axis SteadyShot INSIDE sensor-shift image stabilization is available, too, which minimizes the appearance of camera shake by up to 5.5 stops.


Here is a link to a “Learn More” on B&H Photo’s Explora.


Improved Processing and Speed
A new BIONZ X and front-end LSI were required to add new functionality to Sony’s flagship mirrorless, and should result in faster, more precise autofocus and improved EVF display response times. This should result in more accurate tracking when subjects are moving fast or erratically—sounds like a solid change for professional sports photographers. The Fast Hybrid AF system uses a 693-point phase-detect array with 93% coverage to track subjects and should perform extremely well in all conditions, much like its predecessor.

Now, you can select the focus frame color and will be able to move the frame while the shutter is half-pressed in AF-C mode. Another significant improvement to usability comes in the form of AF tracking when shooting at f/16 when in Focus Priority mode and the option to focus with opened aperture just before exposure, for improved performance in low-light conditions. The a9 II also, unsurprisingly, supports the latest Real-time AF Tracking mode that helps maintain focus on fast-moving subjects and will include Real-time Eye AF for humans and animals.

Another speed-focused tweak comes to continuous shooting. While the a9 II still maxes out at an incredible 20 fps and still boasts no blackout, the mechanical shutter’s speed has been doubled to 10 fps and benefits from anti-flicker detection to ensure clean, bright exposures in less-than-ideal environments.


Better Build and Connectivity
For many, the most important changes have come to the design and connectivity options, both of which have been upgraded to fit the special demands of professionals in fast-moving situations. The overall build is similar to that of the just-announced a7R IV, including superior weather sealing. You can see this on the redesigned battery and media slot covers, the redesigned lens lock button, and additional cushioning around the mount. Dials, buttons, and the joystick have all been improved for added comfort and reliability and a lock has been added to the exposure-compensation dial. The shutter itself has been enhanced, and is now rated to 500,000 exposures, with the in-body stabilization system getting a bump, to 5.5 stops. As for the EVF and rear LCD, these remain unchanged at 3.68m-dot for the OLED EVF, though now with a 120 fps refresh rate, and a 3.0" 1.44m-dot tilting touchscreen.

The real meat of this announcement is in connectivity, with plenty of changes being made to improve workflows. First, it’s worth mentioning that both SD card slots now support UHS-II for faster write speeds at all times. The a9 II gains the USB 3.2 Gen 1 Type-C connector, as well, for hassle-free connection to your computer. For those looking for advanced networking, the Ethernet port gets a serious boost to a 1000BASE-T speed for exceptionally fast image transfer and remote operation. Additionally, wireless now offers a 5 GHz band in addition to the standard 2.4 GHz option for less interference and faster speeds.


Automatic Voice-to-Text Conversion
To make the most of these faster speeds, the accompanying apps have been updated to match. For the wired LAN, the Remote Camera Tool app now has minimized release time lag and live view delays in addition to support for remote SD card formatting, FTP server switching, and changes to the still image storage destination. Imaging Edge Remote for desktop now supports the a9 II for PC Remote shooting via the Wi-Fi connection or tethered by the wired USB Type-C port. Improved data transfer control now makes it possible to transfer files from an SD card over Wi-Fi using the Imaging Edge Mobile app even when the camera is powered off. The Transfer & Tagging add-on app can send FTP setting parameters from your mobile device to the camera, offers automatic data upload to an FTP server with attached metadata, and can perform automatic voice-to-text conversion.

Automatic voice-to-text conversion leads us to the next new function: Voice Memos. This function should help photographers who need to send images as quickly as possible to editors back in the office, using the a9 II’s new FTP capabilities. Snap a photo and then quickly record up to 60 seconds to go along with the photo, ideally describing the situation for editors to grab and caption the image for publication. These .wav audio files can be attached to files and played when the images are reviewed. Using the Transfer & Tagging add-on on a smartphone, you can automatically or manually convert this audio into text to be embedded in the image’s metadata.


The Additional Functions
Last, but not least, comes video. The a9 II is familiar to anyone who used the a9, with UHD 4K recording at up to 30 fps. It benefits from full-sensor readout for sharper images and, now, it can support Real-time Eye AF during video. A nice addition comes from an upgraded Multi Interface Shoe that supports digital audio transmission from compatible devices, such as the ECM-B1M Microphone and XLR-K3M XLR Adapter. Interval Shooting was added, too, although Picture Profiles have been left out since the a9 II is focused more on high-end photography applications where speed is critical.

An improved processor gives users greater efficiency, allowing a bit longer battery life on this model when using the current NP-FZ100 Battery Pack. This will now provide up to 500 shots on a single charge when using the EVF or 690 with the rear LCD. Of course, you can always add to the battery life by using the VG-C4EM Battery Grip or NPA-MQZ1K Multi Battery Adapter.

Menu changes are always appreciated and here we see a great deal more customization. Users can now separate Fn button customization into Stills and Movie settings for even better control schemes. Also, you can now save your user settings to both the camera and SD cards. This makes it easy to create custom configurations for different settings and work with multiple cameras, especially if some are rentals for a specific job.


The Wrap
Overall, the a9 II is a very important release for Sony, especially with the upcoming sporting events that will take place in Tokyo next year. The improvements are substantial and critical for professional photographers who need the ultimate in speed for both their cameras and their workflow. New networking functions and remote control will make the a9 II a viable option for dedicated shooters.[/URL]
https://www.fredmiranda.com/forum/topic/1616075
https://www.fredmiranda.com/forum/topic/1616075
 
I have to say very disappointing, I don’t see why any a7r iii/iv user would even consider this, hopefully it pushes the a9 prices down a lot.
 
Indeed rather disappointing. Sony pulling a Canon here with a minor upgrade.
I'm in the market for an A9, but find the price somewhat too steep to invest my shekels in it.
Also, had plenty of shitty experience with the Sony cameras to be confident in them.

- My Sony external flash burnt out in less then a month and under 500 pictures
- My Sony Nex 3 and Nex 5 were overheating all the time and sometimes the shutter locked itself.
- My a33 stopped working out of the blue, apparently due to a faulty motherboard, probably less then 2k on the shutter, no warranty as it was over a year old.
- My a77 sensor got dirty/dusty with barely any lens changes or outdoor use, and the guys from the camera shop hated cleaning it due to the design.

I used to be working on Panasonic, only had an issue once and it was solved immediately.
Now I'm using mostly Canon + renting Sony and Panasonic stuff from time to time.
 
Rather garish but a shot taken for promo use by a flower/planet seller in her garden..

9kLEeud.jpg


To make up for it something dour...

nprkSV2.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Taken on G5 phone .. knowwhere near as good as you guys .. but its fun
statue-1.jpg

statue-2.jpg

beamish-woods-1.jpg
 
Indeed rather disappointing. Sony pulling a Canon here with a minor upgrade.
I'm in the market for an A9, but find the price somewhat too steep to invest my shekels in it.
Also, had plenty of shitty experience with the Sony cameras to be confident in them.

- My Sony external flash burnt out in less then a month and under 500 pictures
- My Sony Nex 3 and Nex 5 were overheating all the time and sometimes the shutter locked itself.
- My a33 stopped working out of the blue, apparently due to a faulty motherboard, probably less then 2k on the shutter, no warranty as it was over a year old.
- My a77 sensor got dirty/dusty with barely any lens changes or outdoor use, and the guys from the camera shop hated cleaning it due to the design.

I used to be working on Panasonic, only had an issue once and it was solved immediately.
Now I'm using mostly Canon + renting Sony and Panasonic stuff from time to time.
I’ve friends that cream all over about the a7r iii but also don’t want the iv because of the file sizes. Those same people (who the the camera a lot) have also mentioned dust issues.

The a9 and ii are too similar and seems that price is a kick in the nuts.

im a canon shooter but I also have an a6300 and would look to purchase a a7r iii in the future should the price drop just because their af and g master/Milvus lens line up are tasty which would compliment my 5 d iv
 
Yep very nicely taken pictures, you don't need a high end camera to take them and indeed I tend to think that actually its better to learn on something simple and automated, less time spent messing around with settings more time spent on composition and lighting.

Build a decent base of ability first then worry about better gear when you potentially start to hit the limits if your camera. The net is full of men with masses of gear who couldn't take shots as good as those if their lives depended on it.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Howd you get so close to the bear cubs?

You need lots of patience and time just sitting in the same spot for days and weeks if that's what it takes for the animals to get used to you and feel safe around you. In this case the mother was already used to us and luckily the cubs picked up on it pretty quickly, some bears will just never want to be around people though. I see way to many photographers that want to try and do wildlife follow and chase the wildlife away trying to get a shot and then they wonder why they don't get anything, its also dangerous with the bigger animals especially bears. 99% of the time you are sitting around waiting to see something but its worth it.
 
Shot these tonight from light-polluted skies, in addition to the moon being at nearly first quarter: M27 and M57, the Dumbell and Ring nebulas. Once again, I neglected to shoot in RAW.... argh!! One of these days (nights) I'll get it together. If I was at a dark-sky site with no moon, the contrast would be MUCH improved. Seeing was also poor.

Equipment:
Camera - Canon T2i
Lens - Orion 8" F/5 Newtonian (1.83" Celestron secondary) with PC cooling fan. Moderate flocking attempt to blacken the tube and maximize contrast.
Filter - Astronomik CLS
Mount - Celestron AS-GT; unguided with a somewhat accurate polar alignment.

Dumbell Nebula: 2 x 30 seconds at ISO 1600, added together using Paint.NET, and adjusting curves, levels, WB. You can see little speckles of red and blue; these are hot pixels. This is post processed to get the black point down and bring out the detail without overdoing it. The Astronomik filter works by suppressing wavelengths common in mercury and sodium vapor street lights, but its presence screws up the white balance. The images are very heavy in the cyan, and deep red. I had neglected to make a custom WB.
m27.jpg

Ring Nebula: 1x30 seconds at ISO 1600. Similar processing techniques as the above. Although smaller and dimmer, this object actually has a higher surface brightness than the above. Hot pixels are a bit more obvious in this one. These are mitigated by taking darks, but I wasn't up to doing it just yet.
m57.jpg
 
Last edited:
Shot these tonight from light-polluted skies, in addition to the moon being at nearly first quarter: M27 and M57, the Dumbell and Ring nebulas. Once again, I neglected to shoot in RAW.... argh!! One of these days (nights) I'll get it together. If I was at a dark-sky site with no moon, the contrast would be MUCH improved. Seeing was also poor.

Equipment:
Camera - Canon T2i
Lens - Orion 8" F/5 Newtonian (1.83" Celestron secondary) with PC cooling fan. Moderate flocking attempt to blacken the tube and maximize contrast.
Filter - Astronomik CLS
Mount - Celestron AS-GT; unguided with a somewhat accurate polar alignment.

Dumbell Nebula: 2 x 30 seconds at ISO 1600, added together using Paint.NET, and adjusting curves, levels, WB. You can see little speckles of red and blue; these are hot pixels. This is post processed to get the black point down and bring out the detail without overdoing it. The Astronomik filter works by suppressing wavelengths common in mercury and sodium vapor street lights, but its presence screws up the white balance. The images are very heavy in the cyan, and deep red. I had neglected to make a custom WB.
View attachment 655961

Ring Nebula: 1x30 seconds at ISO 1600. Similar processing techniques as the above. Although smaller and dimmer, this object actually has a higher surface brightness than the above. Hot pixels are a bit more obvious in this one. These are mitigated by taking darks, but I wasn't up to doing it just yet.
View attachment 655963

Good news is with RAW you can set the WB in RAW.
 
Back
Top