D
Deleted member 110072
Guest
Often when I use it I tend to do a basic edit that brings up the shadows then convert to Jpeg for more indepth editing.
I do use my phone a lot, while phone cameras have improved tremendously, they are still very limited in what you can do with them and are a lot harder to just set down and have them fire etc.
I’ve used my phone on a tripod , and even with a rode micro book mike and a lav at times
I’d rather just have a small camera. The tiny sensors in the phones are a huge drawback and also needing apps to adjust settings and shit.
A real camera is 1000x better in functionality in so many ways.
There are apps for full controls like you would on a camera, but it’s another PITB.I dunno why, but I can't take any good picture on a smartphone (got the iphone 7). Maybe it's the lack of controls, I dunno.
How many of you guys fly drones? I used to love flying them but they made it a pain in the ass around here to fly them.
I do use my phone a lot, while phone cameras have improved tremendously, they are still very limited in what you can do with them and are a lot harder to just set down and have them fire etc.
I’ve used my phone on a tripod , and even with a rode micro book mike and a lav at times
I’d rather just have a small camera. The tiny sensors in the phones are a huge drawback and also needing apps to adjust settings and shit.
A real camera is 1000x better in functionality in so many ways.
I’ve friends that cream all over about the a7r iii but also don’t want the iv because of the file sizes. Those same people (who the the camera a lot) have also mentioned dust issues.Indeed rather disappointing. Sony pulling a Canon here with a minor upgrade.
I'm in the market for an A9, but find the price somewhat too steep to invest my shekels in it.
Also, had plenty of shitty experience with the Sony cameras to be confident in them.
- My Sony external flash burnt out in less then a month and under 500 pictures
- My Sony Nex 3 and Nex 5 were overheating all the time and sometimes the shutter locked itself.
- My a33 stopped working out of the blue, apparently due to a faulty motherboard, probably less then 2k on the shutter, no warranty as it was over a year old.
- My a77 sensor got dirty/dusty with barely any lens changes or outdoor use, and the guys from the camera shop hated cleaning it due to the design.
I used to be working on Panasonic, only had an issue once and it was solved immediately.
Now I'm using mostly Canon + renting Sony and Panasonic stuff from time to time.
Taken on G5 phone .. knowwhere near as good as you guys .. but its fun
![]()
![]()
![]()
I think the first two shots are really good, some nice composition and interesting light
Some grizzly puppy's and a eagle.
![]()
![]()
![]()
Howd you get so close to the bear cubs?


Shot these tonight from light-polluted skies, in addition to the moon being at nearly first quarter: M27 and M57, the Dumbell and Ring nebulas. Once again, I neglected to shoot in RAW.... argh!! One of these days (nights) I'll get it together. If I was at a dark-sky site with no moon, the contrast would be MUCH improved. Seeing was also poor.
Equipment:
Camera - Canon T2i
Lens - Orion 8" F/5 Newtonian (1.83" Celestron secondary) with PC cooling fan. Moderate flocking attempt to blacken the tube and maximize contrast.
Filter - Astronomik CLS
Mount - Celestron AS-GT; unguided with a somewhat accurate polar alignment.
Dumbell Nebula: 2 x 30 seconds at ISO 1600, added together using Paint.NET, and adjusting curves, levels, WB. You can see little speckles of red and blue; these are hot pixels. This is post processed to get the black point down and bring out the detail without overdoing it. The Astronomik filter works by suppressing wavelengths common in mercury and sodium vapor street lights, but its presence screws up the white balance. The images are very heavy in the cyan, and deep red. I had neglected to make a custom WB.
View attachment 655961
Ring Nebula: 1x30 seconds at ISO 1600. Similar processing techniques as the above. Although smaller and dimmer, this object actually has a higher surface brightness than the above. Hot pixels are a bit more obvious in this one. These are mitigated by taking darks, but I wasn't up to doing it just yet.
View attachment 655963