The Patterson Footage .....

[Deleted member 429137]

Anyone

Igor Burtsev of the International Center of Hominology, brought this video to our attention and had this to say: It presented on Utube as a captured small hairy creature on the Caucases but not exactly where. Somebody wrote that in Karachaevo-Cherkes republic? but as I could understand they were talking in Azerbaijan language (now it’s a separate state by the Kaspian sea)/ And I noticed there on a piece of paper Arabic and Latin letters show the date – November 30, 2016, or еhe year 1395 Hijri (?)and the name Haji Taha – in Russia they don’t use such writings, it’s another confirmation of Azerbaijan location of the case (my personal investigation, as I know Azerbaijan language and Arabic writings too). The Arabic writings show some figures – 75,11,95, 25 – and a couple of letters Baby Bigfoot? Juvenile Almasty? Monkey in a suit? What do you think?

 

[franklinstower]

Anyone

I'm not endorsing missing 411 but it is the strangest stuff I've ever been exposed to. That and "skinwalker ranch". This is actually the craziest thing I've ever heard.

 

[franklinstower]

lol oddly enough, these misperceptions are survival mechanisms. to help us sort through the madness of the world.



I'm actually going to watch Missing 411 right now while I work out. Looking forward to it.

Cool also check out George Knapp hunt for the skinwalker. YouTube.

 

[mommas homeboy]

Who's to say it's not just some very hairy, physically akward man walking through the woods?

There have always been "freak show" level, extremely strange and different human beings on this planet.

 

[franklinstower]

Who's to say it's not just some very hairy, physically akward man walking through the woods?

There have always been "freak show" level, extremely strange and different human beings on this planet.

The problem with that is most sightings come in at around an estimated 500 or 600 pounds and up.

 

[The_Renaissance]

The book about skinwalker ranch is all people need to read to realise there are some extremely fucking weird things going on out there that science could not and cannot explain. That book isn't just the ramblings of an eyewitness, actual scientists were involved in investigating that fucking mental place and the things that happen in the book are flat-out mental.

I'm convicned that if bigfoot exists, its basically a visitor from another dimension that has accidentally walked through some kind of rift in time before swaying back in there. I love reading about bigfoot but I can't buy into the idea that these 9ft tall, 1000lb ape-men creatures actually live out there in the woods, somewhere. for me, its more likely that people are just seeing a fleeting glimpse into another dimension or similar.

 

[franklinstower]

The book about skinwalker ranch is all people need to read to realise there are some extremely fucking weird things going on out there that science could not and cannot explain. That book isn't just the ramblings of an eyewitness, actual scientists were involved in investigating that fucking mental place and the things that happen in the book are flat-out mental.

I'm convicned that if bigfoot exists, its basically a visitor from another dimension that has accidentally walked through some kind of rift in time before swaying back in there. I love reading about bigfoot but I can't buy into the idea that these 9ft tall, 1000lb ape-men creatures actually live out there in the woods, somewhere. for me, its more likely that people are just seeing a fleeting glimpse into another dimension or similar.

I have'nt read the book. I've only heard George Knapp discussing it. That is by far the craziest thing I've ever heard because every kind of supernatural event converged there suggesting it is all one phenomena.

Have you had the chance to look into Missing 411? That is also compelling although I have not read his books and wonder about his method of grouping events.

 

[BearGrounds]

What exactly in that publication is supposed to prove that Bigfoot is real? I don't see it. If the tracks are not real then everything in the article means nothing. And there is no evidence that the tracks are real. People can produce very well made fakes as far as I know. Also, some of the footprints in the article don't even look similar. Figure 5 and 9 for example look very different. At least to me.

Nothing. It's not proof, I specifically said that already (post 401). I linked it as an example of soft evidence in support of their existence. I'm not sure why you or anyone else is going on about proof, as I never posted about there being any proof, just evidence.

As for the difference in print figures, one would expect some variation in authentic track ways. While demonstrating some anatomical commonalities (for those two images, the midtarsal break), they shouldn't all look exactly the same if they're real. I'd be suspicious of any track way with nothing but identical prints with no variation (no difference in toe spread from print to print, for example).

 

[Tyrannosaurus rex]

Nothing. It's not proof, I specifically said that already (post 401). I linked it as an example of soft evidence in support of their existence. I'm not sure why you or anyone else is going on about proof, as I never posted about there being any proof, just evidence.

As for the difference in print figures, one would expect some variation in authentic track ways. While demonstrating some anatomical commonalities (for those two images, the midtarsal break), they shouldn't all look exactly the same if they're real. A track way with nothing but identical prints with no variation (no difference in toe spread from print to print, for example) would seem suspicious.

I must admit I didn't read every post itt.

I get that there will be some differences in real tracks, but these are some huge differences. Like that don't even look like the same species.

 

[BearGrounds]

He leg bend is not seen because it doesn't match up. Oh, Bob up there said in 2000 that he was paid $800 to wear the suit - which is a crazy amount even in modern times. He forgot that $800 back in 1967 was worth over $5000 in today's money. He's a liar !

Lol yea Heronimous is a fraud.

 

[BearGrounds]

I must admit I didn't read every post itt.

I get that there will be some differences in real tracks, but these are some huge differences. Like that don't even look like the same species.

Different subject, different track way. They're not the same individual. Those prints are specifically linked to exemplify the midtarsal pressure ridge. Saying they don't even look like the same species, I feel, is an exaggeration. A bear or cougar print would be markedly different from those two figures in just the toes.

BTW if some hoaxer could produce a fake stomper good enough to replicate all of the supposed track anatomy ascribed to Sasquatch, they'd do better by getting into the prosthetic industry.

 

[Tyrannosaurus rex]

Different subject, different track way. They're not the same individual. Those prints are specifically linked to exemplify the midtarsal pressure ridge. Saying they don't even look like the same species, I feel, is an exaggeration. A bear or cougar print would be markedly different from those two figures in just the toes.

BTW if some hoaxer could produce a fake stomper good enough to replicate all of the supposed track anatomy ascribed to Sasquatch, they'd do better by getting into the prosthetic industry.

Maybe some of those hoaxers are.

Besides, the the supposed track anatomy of Sasquatch is based on the tracks. Not the other way around as far as I know. Hoaxers may just create some fake tracks and then people try to make sense of it in some way and create a hypothesis for the anatomy that matches those fake tracks. That's another possible explanation right?

 

[franklinstower]

Different subject, different track way. They're not the same individual. Those prints are specifically linked to exemplify the midtarsal pressure ridge. Saying they don't even look like the same species, I feel, is an exaggeration. A bear or cougar print would be markedly different from those two figures in just the toes.

BTW if some hoaxer could produce a fake stomper good enough to replicate all of the supposed track anatomy ascribed to Sasquatch, they'd do better by getting into the prosthetic industry.

There was a track found that had a strange anomoly on one of the feet. They took it to a leading pediatrist who said it showed a rare break and healing of the foot that only he and maybe one other person in america would have known about.

 

[BearGrounds]

Maybe some of those hoaxers are.

Besides, the the supposed track anatomy of Sasquatch is based on the tracks. Not the other way around as far as I know. Hoaxers may just create some fake tracks and then people try to make sense of it in some way and create a hypothesis for the anatomy that matches those fake tracks. That's another possible explanation right?

Absolutely. It's a possibility that every single print ever found was hoaxed. An unlikely possibility when talking probabilities, but nevertheless possible.

A good hoaxer would even learn the aspects of what is deemed a credible print, and attempt to replicate it. To do so, however, would require an expertise way beyond your standard Ray Wallace wooden stompers. Someone capable of being at the forefront of the prosthetic industry, more or less.

Just keep in mind that, like Grover Krantz says below in this clip, only one has to be real. Just one....out of thousands.

 

[BearGrounds]

There was a track found that had a strange anomoly on one of the feet. They took it to a leading pediatrist who said it showed a rare break and healing of the foot that only he and maybe one other person in america would have known about.

You're referring to the Bossburg cripple foot. According to those that analyzed it, it had anatomical features evident in the print that were consistent with a injury to that region. Specific to a foot with a midtarsal break. Meldrum discusses this during the documentary "The Unwonted Sasquatch" (A good watch for anyone interested in the topic. Can be rented on YT for like 2 bones or on Amazon Prime).

Krantz found that particular cast very convincing.

 

[Tyrannosaurus rex]

Absolutely. It's a possibility that every single print ever found was hoaxed. An unlikely possibility when talking probabilities, but nevertheless possible.

A good hoaxer would even learn the aspects of what is deemed a credible print, and attempt to replicate it. To do so, however, would require an expertise way beyond your standard Ray Wallace wooden stompers. Someone capable of being at the forefront of prosthetic industry, more or less.

Just keep in mind that, like Grover Krantz says below in this clip, only one has to be real. Just one....out of thousands.

IDK if it's all that unlikely tbh. Bigfoot is well known, lot's of people are probably making fake prints just for the hell of it. I think a lot of those prints are easily debunked as fakes iirc, from the stuff I've seen and read.

So the amount of prints that could be legit is not that big. Not in the thousands right?

 

[franklinstower]

You're referring to the Bossburg cripple foot. According to those that analyzed it, it had anatomical features evident in the print that were consistent with a injury to that region. Meldrum discusses this during the documentary "The Unwonted Sasquatch" (A good watch for anyone interested in the topic. Can be rented on YT for like 2 bones or on Amazon Prime).

Krantz found that particular cast very convincing.

Thanks. Im on my phone and didn't look it up.

 

[BearGrounds]

IDK if it's all that unlikely tbh. Bigfoot is well known, lot's of people are probably making fake prints just for the hell of it. I think a lot of those prints are easily debunked as fakes iirc, from the stuff I've seen and read.

So the amount of prints that could be legit is not that big. Not in the thousands right?

Lots can be written off, plenty can't. A faker would need to account for weight, foot morphology, as well as stride. They'd also have to walk in a more linear fashion. Fakes made with wooden feet are an easy spot, as all you have to do is check to see if there are any compression lines or variation from print to print.

The amount of prints that could be legit is easily up in the hundreds. The late John Green compiled a database of reports and tracks, and guys like Bindernagel and Meldrum keep a collection of casts.

 

[00 Buck]

I just purchased a gopro session and head strap last night.

Tempted to go to this outdoor shooting spot.

Place looks 'squatchy as hell.

Brb finding bigfoot.

 

[BearGrounds]

I just purchased a gopro session and head strap last night.

Tempted to go to this outdoor shooting spot.

Place looks 'squatchy as hell.

Brb finding bigfoot.

If you're serious about Squatchin, use something to mask your scent.