The Patterson Footage .....

[Hans Gercmiov]

Does this nonsense reply mean something to you?

Yeh it means people just saying shit is not evidence.

 

[Hans Gercmiov]

Enlighten us uninformed simpletons.

I invite you to start here.

www.google.com

 

[The Sausage King]

LOL at Hollywood not being able to recreate a monkey costume.

then why haven't they ? The man who created the planet of the apes costumes said he wasn't able to duplicate it.

instead of being a little naysayer, how about you explain why he couldn't do it ?

 

[KILL KILL]

I invite you to start here.

www.google.com

dodge noted.

 

[Hans Gercmiov]

dodge noted.

Note away, son. I wouldn't give a fuck what you think if I actually knew you.

 

[Liquid Smoke]

I don't have anything to add here, but this is the proper forum to debate this. Thanks for sharing.

 

[j123]

thought the 2nd pic was the ape swinging his dong around

 

[KILL KILL]

Note away, son. I wouldn't give a fuck what you think if I actually knew you.

second dodge noted. Provide evidence or go away. You made the claim that it's real. Now support it.

 

[The Sausage King]

second dodge noted. Provide evidence or go away. You made the claim that it's real. Now support it.

in this case, isn't the burden of proof on those who claim it's fake ? the footage was taken and released, and it's stood the test of time, science, and technological scrutiny.

it's not enough to simply dismiss it - especially when professionals in the industry admit they still can't duplicate the suit.

 

[Roca]

 

[SammyPops]

Sounds legit, just like the moon landing hoax and the no gas chambers at Auschwitz.

 

[Hans Gercmiov]

second dodge noted. Provide evidence or go away. You made the claim that it's real. Now support it.

Number one, I didn't say it was real. And B, if you're interested, look into it. There is plenty of information readily avalible. If not, then don't. I do not care either way. I'm not going to try to convince you of anything.

Spoiler

DODGE NOTED!

Beat cha.

 

[KILL KILL]

Number one, I didn't say it was real. And B, if you're interested, look into it. There is plenty of information readily avalible. If not, then don't. I do not care either way. I'm not going to try to convince you of anything.

Spoiler

DODGE NOTED!

Beat cha.

"If you're interested, look into it..."

Holy dodge!

 

[usmctanker242]

in this case, isn't the burden of proof on those who claim it's fake ? the footage was taken and released, and it's stood the test of time, science, and technological scrutiny.

it's not enough to simply dismiss it - especially when professionals in the industry admit they still can't duplicate the suit.

I'm fairly certain this was a clever hoax similar to "The Surgeon's Photographs" of Nessie.

Regardless, you keep saying so many people in costuming can't produce this quality of a suit... can you please source this? I'm not talking a single source, I'm talking every single studio and their costume / effects department saying they couldn't possibly create this suit. I'm just not convinced that any reputable Hollywood studio would admit that they were incapable of producing this kind of suit in writing or on camera. Please source, and please vet your sources so it's not just a bunch of bullshit.

 

[Hans Gercmiov]

"If you're interested, look into it..."

Holy dodge!

 

[Hagelslag2]

Okay, let's assume this is real footage. Why is this the only footage and where is the other evidence? Apparently Bigfoot doesn't live somewhere in the Himalayas, deep in the Amazon or in some other remote location. Some simple cowboys, as you called them yourself, were able to capture this footage. Why isn't there any other evidence, like footprints, feces, hair samples or evidence of any dwellings? We're dealing with a 9ft tall humanoid in an accessible location, with hundreds, if not thousands, of people looking for it. Why isn't there more evidence?

 

[KILL KILL]

in this case, isn't the burden of proof on those who claim it's fake ? the footage was taken and released, and it's stood the test of time, science, and technological scrutiny.

it's not enough to simply dismiss it - especially when professionals in the industry admit they still can't duplicate the suit.

No. Your claim is that it can't be reproduced. A simple search on the Wikipedia page shows differing of opinions on that issue. So, your original claim requires more evidence to support it.

 

[KILL KILL]

Okay, let's assume this is real footage. Why is this the only footage and where is the other evidence? Apparently Bigfoot doesn't life somewhere in the Himalayas, deep in the Amazon or in some other remote location. Some simple cowboys, as you called them yourself, were able to capture this footage. Why isn't there any other evidence, like footprints, feces, hair samples or evidence of any dwellings? We're dealing with a 9ft tall humanoid in an accessible location, with hundreds, if not thousands, of people looking for it. Why isn't there more evidence?

You'd think we'd at least find a carcass

 

[Chesten_Hesten]

Okay, let's assume this is real footage. Why is this the only footage and where is the other evidence? Apparently Bigfoot doesn't live somewhere in the Himalayas, deep in the Amazon or in some other remote location. Some simple cowboys, as you called them yourself, were able to capture this footage. Why isn't there any other evidence, like footprints, feces, hair samples or evidence of any dwellings? We're dealing with a 9ft tall humanoid in an accessible location, with hundreds, if not thousands, of people looking for it. Why isn't there more evidence?

Old Jed bagged him long ago:

 

[OAKS]

A man admitted to wearing the suit.
And it's extremely more likely to have been faked than it is to have any credibility

Several men have claimed to have worn the suit, but by golly, none have brought forth any proof.