- Joined
- Apr 20, 2014
- Messages
- 4,794
- Reaction score
- 0
don't make me go back and quote your lying ass. You specifically said someone earning $800 will only get $400 in the take home pay and you seemed for some silly reason to think that was amusing.
It is not only not amusing, it is bullshit.
Are you slow? Do you understand what a levy is as opposed to a marginal rate of taxation. 1.5% flat rate is a levy.
Let me dumb it down for you. If someone earns $20 million a year and pays 1.5% of that to fund UHC, would that money from that levy be suitable to fund their health care only or potentially the healthcare of them + a LOT of others.
That is the whole point of taxation, you work out the cost to fund and then you tax accordingly. You come up with a figure that will equate to a revenue amount to fund your policies. UHC would not be 50%, wouldn't even be close. You are being disingenuous.
Holy Mother of God you are stupid. Single people already see 35% or more taken out of there checks every two weeks, if you had a 10 % tax rate increase to help cover UHC then that would put someone at paying a 45% tax rate out of there check. close to half. So yes a $800 check could end up close to $400 after ALL FUCKIN TAXES.
AFTER ALL TAXES, AFTER ALL TAXES, AFTER ALL TAXES
Now admit you got confused and move the fuck on.
No one ever said that to fund UHC that you would have to have a 50% tax. I said that people would lose half there checks after the additional tax that would be placed on there already taxed check.
Again, JUST BECAUSE YOUR COUNTRY DOES IT ONE WAY DOESN'T MEAN EVERY OTHER COUNTRY IN THE WORLD WILL DO IT THE SAME.