@lsa is lookng forward to this movie.
From when I first heard about this, I was stoked. However, from the trailer, it looks like they fucked it up. He's not actually supposed to be good at what he does. Damn it, why does every new movie have to look like it's going to suck?!?!?!?!?!
And Neeson is just the wrong guy. He can play the serious guy who thinks he is funny but is not but he has zero goofy acting skills to make his character silly in a fun way. TOns of other talent out there that is capable of doing that but not Neeson.From the first gag, it's so off. A grown man disguising himself as a little girl to infiltrate a hostage situation or whatever, could be funny in the right hands. In this, it's literally a little girl that he CGI morphs out of. It's barely even a gag. It's like a 90's CGI tech demo.
Finally, someone gets it!Easy pass.
I like mcfarlane but hes only producing it.I was going to be optimistic but then I saw Seth McFarlane's name.
Fuck that unfunny unoriginal douche.
I think it’s a hard pass bc there is no discussion on it. It’s a hard and final answer. Maybe it should be a hard no and an easy pass??Finally, someone gets it!
This "hard pass" expression tells me it's hard to pass up, but I have to..
Easy pass should be the expression cuz you dont need to spend one moment in deciding passing it up.
Yep by that you know they wont get how much of the originals comedy was built on word play / dialog . Someone like Stephen Merchant might have done a decent remake putting in that nuanced self deprecating whitty humour without realizing it. Most american writers cant do it esp. Seth because its all about boosting.Leave it to the modern age to make the original film, wherein the lead staggers around with a concrete dildo, seem classy & high-minded.
I actually had my hopes up for this, as Liam Neeson has the comedy chops to crush a quality remake or sequel.
This ain't it. From the opening seconds where it said 'Seth MacFarlane', I knew we were fooked. Too bad.