• We are currently experiencing technical difficulties. We sincerely apologize for the inconvenience.

The Jordan Peterson Thread - V2 -

All he does is cry, dogwhistle, misrepresent facts and spew sophistic, intellectually fraudulent garbage that sounds clever to the stupid.

He's found his perfect audience in the alt-right and among other bigots.

What exactly did he misrepresent in this interview then?

I've heard leftists claim he is stupid person's intellectual a lot, be original man, think for yourself rather than repeat phrases like a parrot. Also that phrase just makes those who spout it come across as sneering douches, doesn't make you sound clever at all.
 
Ah.
In other words you have no examples, and you just came in here to sound off with meaningless invective because, while you can find no legitimate fault with Peterson, you dislike his right-leaning viewer/fan-base and your tribal insecurities leave you incapable of just keeping your prattle to yourself?

Understood.
Carry on.

There are plenty of examples if you look for them. I swear the main problem with the right is they don't know how to research or source information outside of shit YouTube videos, which is probably why the right appeals to the uneducated and the narcissistic.

Besides, I don't have to prove anything to you for me to state I think the guy is trash, I honestly don't give a fuck about your opinion.

You, for example, are stunningly ignorant because you choose not to bother researching anything properly and cling to the most asinine ideas because the jusitfy your completely uneducated world-view. Maybe you don't know how to research, you certainly don't seem to understand even the most basic academic ideas.

Just another SA bigot.
 
Last edited:
I can't be fucked reseaching for you sorry, mainly because I find Peterson both repugnant and boring; his work is sloppy, and serves his agenda, not the facts.

Plus I can't stand his constant whining.

Haha that is what I thought, you have no legitimate argument, your opinions are based purely on feelings rather than facts.
 
What exactly did he misrepresent in this interview then?

I've heard leftists claim he is stupid person's intellectual a lot, be original man, think for yourself rather than repeat phrases like a parrot. Also that phrase just makes those who spout it come across as sneering douches, doesn't make you sound clever at all.

Like I give a fuck if you think I'm clever, as if you could even tell.
 
She was throwing all kinds of sophist tactics at him. Strawman after strawman, even smearing him as a "ALT right troll" at the end ... With all due respect, she deserves some flack.

So what you're saying is.... you hate women?
 
Like I give a fuck if you think I'm clever, as if you could even tell.
Haha typical emotional response I'd expect form a "progressive" tbh. You aren't doing your side any favors, you claim the guy misrepresents facts then when asked to elaborate on how he misrepresents these facts you resort to childishly saying you couldn't be bothered as you got nothing.
 
There are plenty of examples if you look for them. I swear the main problem with the right is they don't know how to research or source information outside of shit YouTube videos, which is probably why the right appeals to the uneducated and the narcissistic.

Besides, I don't have to prove anything to you for me to state I think the guy is trash, I honestly don't give a fuck about your opinion.

You, for example, are stunningly ignorant because you choose not to bother researching anything properly and cling to the most asinine ideas because the jusitfy your completely uneducated world-view. Maybe you don't know how to research, you certainly don't seem to understand even the most basic academic ideas.

Just another SA bigot.

I am stunned by the lack of self-awareness present in absolutely every line of this post :)
Impressive stuff.

Carry on.
 
So what you're saying is.... you hate women?

Can't believe that there are white knights on the internet now trying to defend her.

She is acting like a victim now. A cry-bully. She was trying to bully Jordan Peterson, but couldn't ... and now acts the victim. Ugh, gross.
 
I like when Peterson stumped her with the "Well, you dont care if you offend me" part. Right to not be offended.

She was so stumped. Almost as if she believed that she believes that she couldn't offend white men or something.

Peterson was f**king masterful in debate here. 4D chess.
 
I can't be fucked reseaching for you sorry, mainly because I find Peterson both repugnant and boring; his work is sloppy, and serves his agenda, not the facts.

Plus I can't stand his constant whining.

You shouldn't have to research anything, you're obviously aware of some glaring examples otherwise you wouldn't be so condemning. Just share it. Don't leave it hanging.
I'm not nearly as well versed on JP as most here, but I've never seen anything from him that should attract this kind of vitriol.
 
You claim:
All he does is cry, dogwhistle, misrepresent facts and spew sophistic, intellectually fraudulent garbage that sounds clever to the stupid.

He's found his perfect audience in the alt-right and among other bigots.

Then say you can't be bothered researching to find examples of your claim because you find Peterson repugnant and boring
I can't be fucked reseaching for you sorry, mainly because I find Peterson both repugnant and boring; his work is sloppy, and serves his agenda, not the facts.

Plus I can't stand his constant whining.

Then say there are many examples if you look, even though you haven't cause you don't wanna do the research and THEN say the problem with the right is that they don't know how to research or source information properly.
There are plenty of examples if you look for them. I swear the main problem with the right is they don't know how to research or source information outside of shit YouTube videos, which is probably why the right appeals to the uneducated and the narcissistic.

Besides, I don't have to prove anything to you for me to state I think the guy is trash, I honestly don't give a fuck about your opinion.

You, for example, are stunningly ignorant because you choose not to bother researching anything properly and cling to the most asinine ideas because the jusitfy your completely uneducated world-view. Maybe you don't know how to research, you certainly don't seem to understand even the most basic academic ideas.

Just another SA bigot.

Mind blown.
 
You shouldn't have to research anything, you're obviously aware of some glaring examples otherwise you wouldn't be so condemning. Just share it. Don't leave it hanging.
I'm not nearly as well versed on JP as most here, but I've never seen anything from him that should attract this kind of vitriol.

The guy's screen name is Happiness, and I don't think I've ever seen a post of his that wasn't a frothing rage-gasm. I strongly suspect he's a troll.
 
No problems. Was just letting you know before someone came in and capped on ya for posting about it.

Yes, I thought it was a very good interview as well. Unfortunately the destruction was so intense and the snark comments about so profuse online that some feminists and talking bobble heads are pusing back saying it's and example of male hostility and patriarchy blah blah blah.

Meh, they only need one negative comment and then they can take that and run with it and claim "online abuse!!"

This is cry-bully tactics. She tried bullying Peterson here and got destroyed. Now she claims victim.

Peterson is a hero.
 
I can't be fucked reseaching for you sorry, mainly because I find Peterson both repugnant and boring; his work is sloppy, and serves his agenda, not the facts.

Plus I can't stand his constant whining.

Yeah, that's not an argument.
 
All he does is cry, dogwhistle, misrepresent facts and spew sophistic, intellectually fraudulent garbage that sounds clever to the stupid.

He's found his perfect audience in the alt-right and among other bigots.
Sounds like a copy and paste thing said about Ben Shapiro ... did you get a "talking points cheat sheet" from an George Soro's email ?
 
The guy's screen name is Happiness, and I don't think I've ever seen a post of his that wasn't a frothing rage-gasm. I strongly suspect he's a troll.
I don't think so. He doesn't post as much as he used to, but I remember him as a good poster. I disagree with him here, especially without evidence, but I don't think he's a troll.
 
Do you :eek::eek::eek:s masterbate to obese oldman Trump? Seriously. It’s some weird homo shit that people in the warroom obsess over. Derpie derp derp, the libruhs are hiding under me bed. Do you check under your bed for lefties? DO you check under the left side of the bed for lefties or do the commies hide on both sides?
 
All he does is cry, dogwhistle, misrepresent facts and spew sophistic, intellectually fraudulent garbage that sounds clever to the stupid.

He's found his perfect audience in the alt-right and among other bigots.
I mean, I can get over a lot of his stylistic issues, but my main issue with him is how right wingers think of him as some brilliant intellectualist. Crapping on SJW's is about as mentally strenuous as clubbing baby seals.
 
Do you :eek::eek::eek:s masterbate to obese oldman Trump? Seriously. It’s some weird homo shit that people in the warroom obsess over. Derpie derp derp, the libruhs are hiding under me bed. Do you check under your bed for lefties? DO you check under the left side of the bed for lefties or do the commies hide on both sides?

I used to feel like this about all the lefty talk to. Now I'm not insanely scared of them still but I'm a little more aware of the things going on and paying attention more. This Trans kid phenomenon has sort of caught my attention because it's disgusting to me to be fucking with kids like this. The laws being changed in Canada were really worrying as well as I didn't see Canada as that sort of country.
 
Back
Top