- Joined
- Mar 28, 2005
- Messages
- 14,750
- Reaction score
- 6,537
What's Bellator then since they pay even less?
It's the bootleg UFC
Bootleg gladiator and bootleg pay
What's Bellator then since they pay even less?
It's clever how he used the letters of the acronym UFC to mean something else.

Why? There’s not a single person in here that I’ve ever seen say they are going to stop watching the UFC over this issue. All this TALK is not going to change anything. Certainly not any time soon. It might even take a decade or more to get to a split that some people here would consider fair. Just like it did with every major sport. And those took decades, and player associations to actually get to the point they are at now.That's perfect. It's a wonder no one else has thought of it, tbh. Their bad press is at an all time high, change has to be coming one of these days.
Why? There’s not a single person in here that I’ve ever seen say they are going to stop watching the UFC over this issue. All this TALK is not going to change anything. Certainly not any time soon. It might even take a decade or more to get to a split that some people here would consider fair. Just like it did with every major sport. And those took decades, and player associations to actually get to the point they are at now.
But if it stays exactly as it is right now. Nobody is going to stop watching the UFC. No company just gives away profits for no reason. Why would Endeavor?
Hardly anybody watches it. It doesn’t even carry the UFC’s name or brand. That’s not hurting the UFC’s bottom line. What a brave moral stand you’ve taken.I don’t watch Pretender Series because of this issue.
And I'm pretty sure Viacom has more money.What's Bellator then since they pay even less?
Over twice as much share of the percent of revenue to fighters without exclusive sponsor deals? What a dumb fucking point by one of the notoriously dumbest people here.What's Bellator then since they pay even less?
BrawlerWhat's Bellator then since they pay even less?
Who also isnt billions in debt....And I'm pretty sure Viacom has more money.
Paying too much share percentage so you can't grow the brand seems pretty dumb. Also asking fighters to sell their own tickets to family and friends and warm up on cardboard boxes so they can pay them more percentage also seems dumbOver twice as much share of the percent of revenue to fighters without exclusive sponsor deals? What a dumb fucking point by one of the notoriously dumbest people here.
Well then that's an entirely different complaint, isn't it? Not the stupid shit you were suggesting before. Brand is still successful, makes money every year, and isn't underpaying it's athletes. You make an accusation of underpaying, and now you're arguing that it's dumb because it pays too much. Do you see?Paying too much share percentage so you can't grow the brand seems pretty dumb. Also asking fighters to sell their own tickets to family and friends and warm up on cardboard boxes so they can pay them more percentage also seems dumb
It doesn't pay more than ufc it pays less because they pay fighters more than they are worth so they can't grow the brand and are stuck in an endless circle of no growth and fighters forever making less than the UFC despite paying more percentage.Well then that's an entirely different complaint, isn't it? Not the stupid shit you were suggesting before. Brand is still successful, makes money every year, and isn't underpaying it's athletes. You make an accusation of underpaying, and now you're arguing that it's dumb because it pays too much. Do you see?
Who also isnt billions in debt....